OBJECTIVE: Expansion of autologous chondrocytes is a common step in procedures for cartilage defect repair. Subsequent dedifferentiation can alter cellular response to mechanical loading, having major consequences for the cell's behavior in vivo after reimplantation. Therefore, we examined the response of primary and expanded human articular chondrocytes to mechanical loading. METHOD: Primary and expanded chondrocytes were stretched at either 0.5% or 3.0% at 0.5Hz, 2h per day, for 3 days. Gene expression levels of matrix components (aggrecan (AGC1), lubricin (PRG4), collagen type I (COL1), type II (COL2) and type X (COL10)) as well as matrix enzymes (matrix metalloproteinase 1 (MMP1), MMP3, MMP13) and SOX9 were compared to unstretched controls. To evaluate the effect of a chondrogenic environment on cellular response to stretch, redifferentiation medium was used on expanded cells. RESULTS: In primary chondrocytes, stretch led to mild decreases in AGC1, COL1 and COL10 gene expression (maximum of 3.8-fold) and an up-regulation of PRG4 (2.0-fold). In expanded chondrocytes, expression was down-regulated for AGC1 (up to 21-fold), PRG4 (up to 5.0-fold), COL1 (10-fold) and COL2 (2.9-fold). Also, expression was up-regulated for MMP1 (20-fold) and MMP3 (up to 4-fold), while MMP13 was down-regulated (2.8-fold). A chondrogenic environment appeared to temper effects of stretch. DISCUSSION: Our results show that expansion alters the response of human chondrocytes to stretch. Expanded chondrocytes greatly decrease gene expression of matrix constituents and increase expression of MMPs, whereas primary chondrocytes hardly respond. Our data could be a reference for optimization of cell sources or expansion protocols for reimplanted chondrocytes.

Additional Metadata
Persistent URL dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2007.07.014, hdl.handle.net/1765/15176
Citation
Das, R.H.J., Jahr, H., Verhaar, J.A.N., van der Linden, J.C., van Osch, G.J.V.M., & Weinans, H.H.. (2008). In vitro expansion affects the response of chondrocytes to mechanical stimulation. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 16(3), 385–391. doi:10.1016/j.joca.2007.07.014