Elsevier

Gynecologic Oncology

Volume 114, Issue 3, September 2009, Pages 523-527
Gynecologic Oncology

Review
Postoperative mortality after primary cytoreductive surgery for advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer: A systematic review

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.03.011Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

Accurate estimation of the risk of postoperative mortality (POM) is essential for the decision whether or not to perform cytoreductive surgery in a patient with advanced stage ovarian cancer. To ascertain modern reference figures, a systematic review of studies reporting POM after primary cytoreductive surgery for advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) was performed.

Materials and methods

A Medline search was performed to retrieve papers on primary cytoreductive surgery for advanced stage EOC. Twenty-three papers met the inclusion criteria and were reviewed.

Results

According to population-based studies, POM after primary cytoreductive surgery for EOC is 3.7% on average. Single centre studies report an average rate of 2.5%. The overall mean POM is 2.8%. POM is more frequent for elderly women and after extensive procedures. Accurate information on age-specific and procedure-specific rates could not be obtained.

Conclusion

POM rates after surgery for EOC are satisfactorily low. There is a clear need for reliable reference figures for mortality after debulking surgery in the elderly.

Introduction

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) continues to be the leading cause of death from gynaecological cancer [1]. Cure rates are low because most patients are diagnosed with advanced disease. Treatment is based on cytoreductive surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy. Individual prognosis depends on FIGO (International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics) stage [2] and the ability to perform optimal cytoreductive surgery [3], [4], [5]. To achieve a minimal residual tumour load, surgery may need to be quite extensive and can be accompanied by postoperative complications.

Postoperative morbidity and mortality depend upon the extent of surgery, age, performance status and co-morbidity [6], [7], [8], [9]. Cytoreductive surgery clearly improves survival but may be withheld if the operative risk is deemed too high. The role of upfront cytoreductive surgery in patients with unresectable disease is under debate. Several studies suggest that neo-adjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval surgery will lead to similar survival with less operative morbidity [10], [11], [12].

POM is generally defined as death from any cause within 30 days of operation and has been suggested as a performance indicator for other types of cancer. For ovarian cancer, POM is considered to be low but may yet be useful as an objective parameter of surgical care. To obtain reference standards for POM, we performed a systematic review on published POM rates after primary cytoreductive surgery for advanced stage EOC.

Section snippets

Search methods

We performed a Medline search of English-language articles published between January 1, 1981, and March 1, 2008. The keywords used were: “ovarian carcinoma”, “ovarian cancer”, “ovarian neoplasma” and “cytoreductive surgery”, “surgical outcome”, “30-day mortality”, “in-hospital mortality”, “postoperative death”, “postoperative mortality” and “postoperative complications”. Additionally, the Cochrane Library and Embase were searched for any relevant reports.

Inclusion criteria

POM was defined as death from any cause

Description of studies

We identified 23 eligible reports on primary cytoreductive surgery for advanced stage EOC. Twenty reports described retrospectively collected data; three studies reported results of a prospective study.

Population-based studies

Three population-based case series on cytoreductive surgery for advanced stage EOC were found, with a mean POM rate of 3.7% (range 2.5–4.8%) (Table 1).

Single centre studies

Twenty single centre reports, on primary cytoreductive surgery for advanced stage EOC, reported data on postoperative mortality. POM ranged from 0

Discussion

Population-based reports on POM after primary cytoreductive surgery for advanced stage EOC vary with rates ranging from 2.5% to 4.8%, with a mean of 3.7%. Reports from single centres present slightly better results, with a mean POM of 2.5%. The overall POM is 2.8% on average. Published results may, however, be biased due to reporting and publication bias.

The low operative risk corroborates the current treatment strategy of primary cytoreductive surgery followed by platinum-based chemotherapy in

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

References (55)

  • MarchettiD.L. et al.

    Treatment of advanced ovarian carcinoma in the elderly

    Gynecol. Oncol.

    (1993 Apr)
  • VernooijF. et al.

    The outcomes of ovarian cancer treatment are better when provided by gynecologic oncologists and in specialized hospitals: a systematic review

    Gynecol. Oncol.

    (2007 Jun)
  • ElitL. et al.

    Outcomes in surgery for ovarian cancer

    Gynecol. Oncol.

    (2002 Dec)
  • GeislerJ.P. et al.

    Nutritional assessment using prealbumin as an objective criterion to determine whom should not undergo primary radical cytoreductive surgery for ovarian cancer

    Gynecol. Oncol.

    (2007 Jul)
  • ZalogaG.P.

    Parenteral nutrition in adult inpatients with functioning gastrointestinal tracts: assessment of outcomes

    Lancet

    (2006 Apr 1)
  • BlackD. et al.

    Effect of perioperative venous thromboembolism on survival in ovarian, primary peritoneal, and fallopian tube cancer

    Gynecol. Oncol.

    (2007 Oct)
  • KhuriS.F.

    The NSQIP: a new frontier in surgery

    Surgery

    (2005 Nov)
  • Soegaard AndersenE. et al.

    The results of treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer after centralisation of primary surgery. Results from North Jutland, Denmark

    Gynecol. Oncol.

    (2005 Dec)
  • PiverM.S. et al.

    The potential for optimal (less than or equal to 2 cm) cytoreductive surgery in advanced ovarian carcinoma at a tertiary medical center: a prospective study

    Gynecol. Oncol.

    (1986 May)
  • EisenkopS.M. et al.

    The impact of subspecialty training on the management of advanced ovarian cancer

    Gynecol. Oncol.

    (1992 Nov)
  • GuidozziF. et al.

    Extensive primary cytoreductive surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer

    Gynecol. Oncol.

    (1994 Jun)
  • LiuP.C. et al.

    Effect of surgical debulking on survival in stage IV ovarian cancer

    Gynecol. Oncol.

    (1997 Jan)
  • BristowR.E. et al.

    Survival impact of surgical cytoreduction in stage IV epithelial ovarian cancer

    Gynecol. Oncol.

    (1999 Mar)
  • BristowR.E. et al.

    Complete surgical cytoreduction of advanced ovarian carcinoma using the argon beam coagulator

    Gynecol. Oncol.

    (2001 Oct)
  • EisenkopS.M. et al.

    Relative influences of tumor volume before surgery and the cytoreductive outcome on survival for patients with advanced ovarian cancer: a prospective study

    Gynecol. Oncol.

    (2003 Aug)
  • EltabbakhG.H. et al.

    Factors associated with cytoreducibility among women with ovarian carcinoma

    Gynecol. Oncol.

    (2004 Nov)
  • ChiD.S. et al.

    Improved optimal cytoreduction rates for stages IIIC and IV epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer: a change in surgical approach

    Gynecol. Oncol.

    (2004 Sep)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text