Abstract
Individuals’ preferences over opportunity sets may display “preference for flexibility” which prescribes to gradually eliminate alternatives from a given set until a final choice is made. One rationale for this preference for flexibility is individuals’ incentive to postpone the final choice in order to better learn their underlying preferences over basic alternatives. In this paper we show that even in the absence of learning, preference for flexibility arises if individuals are risk-averse or, at least, are not very risk-seeking. Thus, individual’s attitude towards risk provides yet another rationale for preference for flexibility. One of our results is that in the absence of learning, risk-neutral as well as risk-averse individuals display the same, maximal preference for flexibility.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ficco, S., et al.: A theory of procedurally rational choice: optimization without evaluation. Tinbergen Institute discussion paper # 06-001/1 (2006)
Kalai G., Rubinstein A., Spiegler R.: Rationalizing choice functions by multiple rationale. Econometrica 70(6), 2481–2488 (2002). doi:10.1111/1468-0262.00382
Koopmans, T.C.: On the flexibility of future preferences. In: Shelly, M.W., Bryan, G.L. (eds.) Human Judgments and Optimality. New York, 246, 254 (1964)
Krause A.: Ranking opportunity sets in a simple intertemporal framework. Econ Theory 35(1), 147–154 (2008). doi:10.1007/s00199-007-0243-6
Kreps D.M.: A representation theorem for preference for flexibility. Econometrica 47, 565–577 (1979). doi:10.2307/1910406
Lipman B.L.: Information processing and bounded rationality: a survey. Can J Econ Can Econ Assoc 28(1), 42–67 (1995)
Manzini P., Mariotti M.: Sequentially rationalizable choice. Am Econ Rev 97(5), 1824–1839 (2007). doi:10.1257/aer.97.5.1824
Miller G.A.: The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol Rev 63, 81–97 (1956). doi:10.1037/h0043158
Pattanaik P.K., Xu Y.: On ranking opportunity sets in terms of freedom of choice. Rech Econ Louvain 56, 383–390 (1990)
Puppe C.: Freedom of choice and rational decisions. Soc Choice Welf 12, 137–153 (1995). doi:10.1007/BF00179829
Puppe C.: An axiomatic approach to preferences for freedom of choice. J Econ Theory 68, 174–199 (1996). doi:10.1006/jeth.1996.0009
Simon H.: A behavioral model of rational choices. Q J Econ 69, 99–118 (1955). doi:10.2307/1884852
Tversky A.: Elimination by aspects: a theory of choice. Psychol Rev 79, 281–299 (1972). doi:10.1037/h0032955
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
We thank Han Bleichrodt, Robert Dur, Chaim Fershtman, Maarten Janssen, Peran van Reeven, Peter Wakker, and Timothy van Zandt for helpful comments to and inspiring discussions. We are very grateful to the anonymous referee for very constructive comments and suggestions.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Ficco, S., Karamychev, V.A. Preference for flexibility in the absence of learning: the risk attitude effect. Econ Theory 40, 405–426 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-008-0385-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-008-0385-1