Skip to main content
Log in

Find Out How Much It Means to Me! The Importance of Interpersonal Respect in Work Values Compared to Perceived Organizational Practices

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two large online surveys were conducted among employees in Germany to explore the importance employees and organizations place on aspects of interpersonal respect in relation to other work values. The first study (n = 589) extracted a general ranking of work values, showing that employees rate issues of respect involving supervisors particularly high. The second study (n = 318) replicated the previous value ranking. Additionally, it is shown that the value priorities indicated by employees do not always match their perceptions of actual organizational practices. Particularly, interpersonal respect issues that involve employees’ supervisors diverge strongly negative. Consequences and potentials for change in organizations are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bass, B.M., & Stogdill, R.M.1990, Bass & Stogdill’s handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications, 3rd edition (Free Press, New York, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, D.J. 1970, Beliefs, attitudes, and human affairs, (Brooks-Cole, Belmont, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum, M.H. (2004). Human research and data collection via the internet. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 803–832. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Branscombe, N.R., Spears, R., Ellemers, N., & Doosje, B. (2002). Intragroup and intergroup evaluation effects on group behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(6), 744–753. doi:10.1177/0146167202289004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chhokar, J.S., Brodbeck, F.C., & House, R.J. (Eds.).(2007). Culture and leadership across the world: The GLOBE book of in-depth studies of 25 societies. Mahwah, NJ: LEA Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwall, S.L. (1977). Two kinds of respect. Ethics, 88(1), 36–49. doi:10.1086/292054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Cremer, D. (2003). Noneconomic motives predicting cooperation in public good dilemmas: The effect of received respect on contributions. Social Justice Research, 16(4), 367–377. doi:10.1023/A:1026361632114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, R. S.: 2003, ‹Respect’, in E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2003 edition). Viewed 14 Sept 2003

  • Eckloff, T., & van Quaquebeke, N (2008) ‹Entwicklung und Validierung einer Skala zu respektvoller Führung [Development and validiation of a scale on respectful leadership]’. In: E. H. Witte (ed). Sozialpsychologie und Werte. Pabst Science Publishers: Lengerich. pp. 243–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, S. (1979). The stability of behavior: On predicting most of the people much of the time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(7), 1097–1126. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.7.1097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E.T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94(3), 319–340. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.94.3.319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, T.E., Jr. 1998, ‹Respect for persons’, in E. Craig (ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, (Routledge, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G.H. 1991, Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind, (McGraw-Hill, London, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • House, R.J., Hanges, P.J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P., & Gupta, V (2004) Culture leadership and organizations The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E.E., & Gerard, H. (1967). Foundations of social psychology, ((1967). Oxford, England: Wiley. Wiley Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A., & Bretz, R. D.: 1992, ‹Effects of work values on job choice decisions’. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(3), 261–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T.A., Piccolo, R.F., & Ilies, R. (2004). The forgotten ones? The validity of consideration and initiating structure in leadership research. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(1), 36–51. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I.: 2003, Kritik der praktischen Vernunft. Kritik der Urtheilskraft, Reprint of the 1968 Edition (de Gruyter, Berlin)

  • Kerr, S., Schreisheim, C.A., Murphy, C.J., & Stogdill, R.M. (1974). Toward a contingency theory of leadership based upon the consideration and initiating structure literature. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 12(1), 62–82. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(74)90037-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraut, R., Olson, J., Banaji, M., Bruckman, A., Cohen, J., & Couper, M. (2004). ‹Psychological research online: Report of board of scientific affairs’ advisory group on the conduct of research on the internet’. The American Psychologist, 59(2), 105–117. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.59.2.105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E.A. 1976, ‹The nature and causes of job satisfaction’, in M. Dunnett (ed.), The handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, (Rand-McNally, Chicago, IL), pp. 1297–1349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, E.S. (1994). Work values: A gender comparison and implications for practice. Psychological Reports, 74(2), 415–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meglino, B.M., & Ravlin, E.C. (1998). Individual values in organizations: Concepts, controversies, and research. Journal of Management, 24(3), 351–389. doi:10.1016/S0149-2063(99)80065-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D.T. (2001). Disrespect and the experience of injustice. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 527–552. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N.P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pryor, R.G. (1983). The influence of social desirability as a response set on the measurement of values/preferences related to work. Australian Psychologist, 18(3), 359–369. doi:10.1080/00050068308255406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, M.D., & Clore, G.L. (2001). Simulation, scenarios, and emotional appraisal: Testing the convergence of real and imagined reactions to emotional stimuli. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(11), 1520–1532. doi:10.1177/01461672012711012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rokeach, M. 1973, The nature of human values, (Free Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, B. (2007). Respect, equality, and power: A social psychological perspective. Gruppendynamik und Organisationsberatung, 38(3), 309–326. doi:10.1007/s11612-007-0027-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, B., & Stürmer, S. (2003). Respect for group members: Intragroup determinants of collective identification and group-serving behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(2), 183–193. doi:10.1177/0146167202239043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, B., & Stürmer, S. (2005). In search of the active ingredient of respect: A closer look at the role of acceptance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35(6), 809–818. doi:10.1002/ejsp.272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sleebos, E., Ellemers, N., & de Gilder, D. (2006). The carrot and the stick: Affective commitment and acceptance anxiety as motives for discretionary group efforts by respected and disrespected group members. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(2), 244–255. doi:10.1177/0146167205282147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, H.J., Tyler, T.R., Huo, Y.J., Ortiz, D.J., & Lind, E.A. (1998). The self-relevant implications of the group-value model: Group membership, self-worth, and treatment quality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34(5), 470–493. doi:10.1006/jesp.1998.1360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, K., Faragher, B., & Cooper, C.L. (2001). Well-being and occupational health in the 21st century workplace. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74(4), 489–509. doi:10.1348/096317901167497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spears, R., Ellemers, N., & Doosje, B. (2005). Let me count the ways in which I respect thee: Does competence compensate or compromise lack of liking from the group? European Journal of Social Psychology, 35(2), 263–279. doi:10.1002/ejsp.248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stogdill, R.M. (1950). Leadership, membership and organization. Psychological Bulletin, 47(1), 1–14. doi:10.1037/h0053857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T.R., & Blader, S.L. (2000) Cooperation in groups: Procedural justice social identity and behavioral engagement. Psychology Press: Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T.R., & Blader, S.L. (2003). The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7(4), 349–361. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0704_07.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Quaquebeke, N., Henrich, D.C., & Eckloff, T. (2007). ‹“It’s not tolerance I’m asking for, it’s respect!” A conceptual framework to differentiate between tolerance, acceptance and respect’. Gruppendynamik und Organisationsberatung, 38(2), 185–200. doi:10.1007/s11612-007-0015-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vroom, V.H. 1964, Work and motivation, (Wiley, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R.M., Jr. 1979, ‹Change and stability in values and value systems: A sociological perspective’, in M. Rokeach (ed.), Understanding human values, (Free Press, New York), pp. 15–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yukl, G.A. 2002, Leadership in organizations, 5th edition (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Niels van Quaquebeke.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Quaquebeke, N., Zenker, S. & Eckloff, T. Find Out How Much It Means to Me! The Importance of Interpersonal Respect in Work Values Compared to Perceived Organizational Practices. J Bus Ethics 89, 423–431 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-0008-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-0008-6

Keywords

Navigation