Elsevier

European Journal of Cancer

Volume 46, Issue 18, December 2010, Pages 3393-3399
European Journal of Cancer

Differential expression and prognostic value of HMGA1 in pancreatic head and periampullary cancer

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2010.07.024Get rights and content

Abstract

The high mortality rate and minimal progress made in the treatment of pancreatic cancer over the last few decades, warrant an alternative approach. Treatment protocols should be individualised to the patient guided by prognostic markers. A particularly interesting target would be the architectural transcription factor high mobility group A1 (HMGA1), that is low or undetectable in normal tissue, induced during neoplastic transformation and consequently often exceptionally high in cancer. The aim of the current study was therefore to determine the differential expression of HMGA1 in pancreatic head and periampullary cancer and investigate its relation with outcome.

HMGA1 expression was determined by immunohistochemistry on original paraffin embedded tissue from 99 pancreatic head- and 112 periampullary cancers (with R0). Expression was investigated for associations with recurrence free (RFS), cancer specific (CSS) and overall survival (OS) and conventional prognostic factors.

HMGA1 was expressed in 47% and 26% of pancreatic head- and periampullary cancer, respectively and associated with poor RFS, CSS and OS in periampullary cancer. CSS 5 years following surgery was 25% and 44% for patients with tumours which were positive or negative for HMGA1 protein, respectively. HMGA1 expression was not associated with survival in pancreatic head cancer.

In conclusion HMGA1 was identified as an independent prognostic marker predicting poor outcome in periampullary cancer. Although expressed to a higher extent as compared to periampullary cancer, HMGA1 was not associated with survival in pancreatic head cancer.

Introduction

With yearly mortality rates equalling incidence and a 5-year survival rate following diagnosis of 5%, pancreatic cancer remains a serious health problem.1 Almost 80% of patients present with major vessel involvement or distant metastasis, precluding them from resection, currently still the only potential for cure. Even following the resection most patients will develop recurrent disease.2 Despite attempts to improve outcome by several adjuvant chemo- and/or radio-therapy regimens, little to no progress has been made in the last few decades.3 Specialists therefore claim that therapy should be individualised to the patient, guided by prognostic markers. One such candidate marker could be high mobility group A 1 (HMGA1).

HMGA1 proteins, originally discovered in HeLa cells,4 are nuclear DNA-binding proteins which by interacting with the transcription machinery and altering chromatin structure, regulate the transcription of a multitude of genes.5, 6 HMGA1 has three isoforms encoded by the same gene, however generated through an alternative splicing mechanism.7, 8 HMGA1 is increased during embryogenesis and becomes low or undetectable in normal adult tissue.9 However, increased levels have also been observed in rat thyroid cell lines following transformation with oncogenes.10, 11 Furthermore, neoplastic transformation was associated with HMGA1 expression in human prostate-,12, 13 thyroid-,14, 15 colorectal-,16, 17, 18, 19, 20 cervix-,21 pancreas-,22, 23, 24 gastric-,25 ovary-,26 breast-,27 liver-,28 lung-,29 uterine-30 and head and neck-31 tissue and blood.32 A relation with worse pathological factors was observed in some of these.12, 13, 18, 20, 28, 33 Interestingly, following orthotopic injection of human pancreatic cancer cells, increased HMGA1 expression was observed in metastasis as compared to the primary tumour. A relation of HMGA1 expression with disease progression13, 20, 31 and poor survival24, 28, 29 was observed in some clinical studies. Of interest as well is the differential expression of HMGA1 between different neuroblastic tumours and different testicular germ cell tumours.34, 35

The expression of HMGA1 proteins in cancer cells and not in their normal counterparts makes it a particular interesting target for therapy. Adenovirus mediated suppression of HMGA1 inhibited cell growth in carcinoma cells derived from human thyroid, lung, colon and breast, however had no effect on normal thyroid cells in vitro. Furthermore, adenovirus-mediated suppression of HMGA1 in vivo reduced thyroid tumour size.36 This growth inhibitory effect mediated by the suppression of HMGA1 was confirmed in pancreatic cancer.37, 38 Liau and co-workers showed that silencing of HMGA1-decreased anoikis resistance and cellular-invasiveness in vitro, metastatic potential in vivo and increased sensitivity to gemcitabine both in vitro and in vivo.38, 39, 40 They also provided evidence suggesting HMGA1 to be an independent predictor of poor postoperative survival in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.24

The evidence for an important role of HMGA1 proteins in tumour progression and the differential expression between subtypes of some tumours, prompted us to investigate the differential expression of HMGA1 in pancreatic head and the prognostically more favourable periampullary cancer and explore the relation with the outcome in both tumour types.

Section snippets

Patient Population

Retrospectively, 231 patients treated for pancreatic adenocarcinoma with curative intend at Erasmus Medical Center between 1987 and 2008 who had no microscopically residual tumour (R0) were identified. Tumours were classified by location having its origin either in the pancreatic head or periampullary region, the latter group comprising tumours originating in the Ampulla of Vater or the distal common bile duct. Tumour samples originating before the new 2002 UICC TNM classification were

Patient population

Tissue blocks were available from 222 out of 231 patients. Eleven slides could not be scored due to poor quality. As a result immunostaining was correlated with established prognostic factors for 211 cases. The age of the patients ranged from 36 to 87 years (median 65 years) and the study population included slightly more males than females (122 vs 89). Ninety-nine tumours originated in the head of the pancreas whereas 112 patients had periampullary cancer. Nine patients died during postoperative

Discussion

This is the first study to date reporting the differential expression of HMGA1 in pancreatic head and periampullary cancer.

Our results are obtained in the largest series of pancreatic cancer studies thus far and in contrast to some of the prior reports: Abe and co-workers showed that all 15 pancreatic duct cancers investigated were positive (that is at least 20% of nuclei positive) for HMGA1, whereas this protein was absent in nuclei of normal pancreas cells.22 Liau and coworkers observed a 93%

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank K. Biermann for encircling the remaining tumours, the department of clinical pathology for using their equipment and J.A.P. Rens and T. Soullie for their supportive work.

Furthermore, the first author would like to thank Dr. E.E. Whang from the department of General Surgery at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston for raising the author’s interest in HMGA1, during her research period in his lab.

References (43)

  • G. Chiappetta et al.

    High level expression of the HMGI (Y) gene during embryonic development

    Oncogene

    (1996)
  • V. Giancotti et al.

    Changes in nuclear proteins on transformation of rat epithelial thyroid cells by a murine sarcoma retrovirus

    Cancer Res

    (1985)
  • V. Giancotti et al.

    Elevated levels of a specific class of nuclear phosphoproteins in cells transformed with v-ras and v-mos oncogenes and by cotransfection with c-myc and polyoma middle T genes

    EMBO J

    (1987)
  • Y. Tamimi et al.

    Increased expression of high mobility group protein I(Y) in high grade prostatic cancer determined by in situ hybridization

    Cancer Res

    (1993)
  • Y. Tamimi et al.

    A retrospective study of high mobility group protein I(Y) as progression marker for prostate cancer determined by in situ hybridization

    Br J Cancer

    (1996)
  • G. Chiappetta et al.

    The expression of the high mobility group HMGI (Y) proteins correlates with the malignant phenotype of human thyroid neoplasias

    Oncogene

    (1995)
  • G. Chiappetta et al.

    Detection of high mobility group I HMGI(Y) protein in the diagnosis of thyroid tumors: HMGI(Y) expression represents a potential diagnostic indicator of carcinoma

    Cancer Res

    (1998)
  • M. Fedele et al.

    Human colorectal carcinomas express high levels of high mobility group HMGI(Y) proteins

    Cancer Res

    (1996)
  • D.H. Kim et al.

    Expression of the HMGI(Y) gene in human colorectal cancer

    Int J Cancer

    (1999)
  • N. Abe et al.

    Determination of high mobility group I(Y) expression level in colorectal neoplasias: a potential diagnostic marker

    Cancer Res

    (1999)
  • G. Chiappetta et al.

    High mobility group HMGI(Y) protein expression in human colorectal hyperplastic and neoplastic diseases

    Int J Cancer

    (2001)
  • Cited by (15)

    • Long-term survival after resection for non-pancreatic periampullary cancer followed by adjuvant intra-arterial chemotherapy and concomitant radiotherapy

      2015, HPB
      Citation Excerpt :

      This hypothesis is supported by the superior survival of patients with NPPC, even after adjusting for tumour size, positive lymph nodes and stage.11,12 Evidence is mounting that these tumours may have a different genetic basis and express different proteins, microRNA and growth factor receptors.13-17 It may become possible in the future to use these biomarkers to identify more specific subtypes of NPPC and PDAC and select a more targeted type of adjuvant therapy.

    • Bcl-2 associated anthanogen-1 (Bag-1) expression and prognostic value in pancreatic head and periampullary cancer

      2013, European Journal of Cancer
      Citation Excerpt :

      Under stressful circumstances Bag-1/Raf-1 complexes are replaced by Bag-1/Hsp70 complexes, resulting in inhibition of DNA synthesis and cell growth.22 The differential effect of Bag-1 on prognosis of pancreatic head and periampullary cancer, previously also observed for high mobility group A1 (HMGA1),20 suggests that although anatomically closely related with stem cells resembling each other, pancreatic head- and periampullary cancer are two different entities with different molecular signatures and behaviour. In case of Bag-1 the different behaviour is probably caused by the specific isoforms present, its subcellular location and consequently the molecules it interacts with.

    • Expression and prognostic significance of thymidylate synthase (TS) in pancreatic head and periampullary cancer

      2012, European Journal of Surgical Oncology
      Citation Excerpt :

      In contrast, no association with outcome was observed for TS expression in the periampullary group. We have previously suggested that pancreatic head and periampullary tumours are distinct biological entities, based on a distinct prognostic effect of HMGA1 observed in both tumours.40 The current TS data seem to support this hypothesis.

    • Angiogenesis: A prognostic determinant in pancreatic cancer?

      2011, European Journal of Cancer
      Citation Excerpt :

      Although both pancreatic head and periampullary cancer have a close anatomic relation, they have different stem cell origins. This difference in origin could explain the different molecular characteristics and behaviour of both tumours, reflected by the currently observed difference in MVD but also the previously observed differences in expression rates of c-erb,55 p53, Ki-67,56 SMAD 457 and HMGA1 and the effect on prognosis of both tumours.58 No association of MVD with other prognostic factors could be identified in periampullary cancer, whereas in pancreatic head cancer, a higher MVD coincided with lymph node involvement.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text