Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Long-term impact of secondary preventive treatments in patients with stable angina

  • CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE
  • Published:
European Journal of Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We assessed the independent effects of beta blockers, calcium antagonists, lipid-lowering drugs, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), anti-platelet drugs, vitamin K antagonists, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery by-pass grafting (CABG) on mortality and on the composite endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, stroke or heart failure in patients with stable angina pectoris. We estimated the effects of the interventions used at baseline by multivariate Cox regression and during follow-up by G-estimation in 7,665 patients followed for a mean of 5 years in the ACTION trial. Adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) comparing all cause mortality among users during follow-up to non-users were 1.01 (0.91, 1.09) for beta blockade, 0.82 (0.75, 0.89) for ACEIs or ARBs, 0.93 (0.87, 0.98) for calcium antagonists, 0.54 (0.49, 0.62) for lipid-lowering drugs, 0.49 (0.42, 0.53) for anti-platelet drugs, 0.74 (0.69, 0.78) for PCI, and 0.91 (0.82, 0.98) for CABG. Effects on the composite endpoint were less marked. This observational study confirms that ACEIs or ARBs, lipid-lowering and anti-platelet drugs as used in the everyday management of stable angina have independent secondary preventive effects. Calcium antagonists, PCI and CABG also appear to improve outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ACEI:

Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor

aHR:

Adjusted hazard ratio

ARB:

Angiotensin receptor blocker

ATC:

Anatomical therapeutic chemical

CABG:

Coronary artery by-pass grafting

CEC:

Critical events committee

CI:

Confidence interval

GCP:

Good clinical practice

GITS:

Gastrointestinal therapeutic system

HF:

Heart failure

HR:

Hazard ratio

ICH:

International conference on harmonisation

MI:

Myocardial infarction

PCI:

Percutaneous coronary intervention

References

  1. Kjekshus J, Apetrei E, Barrios V, Böhm M, Cleland JG, Cornel JH, Dunselman P, Fonseca C, Goudev A, Grande P, Gullestad L, Hjalmarson A, Hradec J, Jánosi A, Kamenský G, Komajda M, Korewicki J, Kuusi T, Mach F, Mareev V, McMurray JJ, Ranjith N, Schaufelberger M, Vanhaecke J, van Veldhuisen DJ, Waagstein F, Wedel H, Wikstrand J. CORONA Group. Rosuvastatin in older patients with systolic heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2248–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Poole-Wilson PA, Lubsen J, Kirwan BA, van Dalen FJ, Wagener G, Danchin N, Just H, Fox KA, Pocock SJ, Clayton TC, Motro M, Parker JD, Bourassa MG, Dart AM, Hildebrandt P, Hjalmarson A, Kragten JA, Molhoek GP, Otterstad JE, Seabra-Gomes R, Soler-Soler J, Weber S. Coronary disease Trial Investigating Outcome with Nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system investigators. Effect of long-acting nifedipine on mortality and cardiovascular morbidity in patients with stable angina requiring treatment (ACTION trial): randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2004;364:849–57.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lubsen J, Poole-Wilson PA, Pocock SJ, van Dalen FJ, Baumann J, Kirwan BA, Parker AB. Design and current status of ACTION: A Coronary disease Trial Investigating Outcome with Nifedipine GITS. Gastro-Intestinal Therapeutic System. Eur Heart J. 1998;19(I):I20–32.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Management of stable angina pectoris. Recommendations of the Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 1997;18(3):394–413.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dalal H, Evans PH, Campbell JL. Recent developments in secondary prevention and cardiac rehabilitation after acute myocardial infarction. Br Med J. 2004;328:693–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fox K, Garcia MA, Ardissino D, Buszman P, Camici PG, Crea F, Daly C, De Backer G, Hjemdahl P, Lopez-Sendon J, Marco J, Morais J, Pepper J, Sechtem U, Simoons M, Thygesen K, Priori SG, Blanc JJ, Budaj A, Camm J, Dean V, Deckers J, Dickstein K, Lekakis J, McGregor K, Metra M, Morais J, Osterspey A, Tamargo J, Zamorano JL. Task Force on the Management of Stable Angina Pectoris of the European Society of Cardiology; ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG). Guidelines on the management of stable angina pectoris: executive summary: the Task Force on the Management of Stable Angina Pectoris of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2006;27:1341–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kirwan BA, Lubsen J, Poole-Wilson PA. Treatment of angina pectoris: associations with symptom severity. Int J Cardiol. 2005;98:299–306.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kirwan BA, Lubsen J, Brouwer S, Danchin N, Battler A, Bayes de Luna A, Dunselman PH, Glasser S, Koudstaal PJ, Sutton G, van Dalen FJ, Poole-Wilson PA. ACTION (A Coronary disease Trial Investigating Outcome with Nifedipine GITS) investigators. Diagnostic criteria and adjudication process both determine published event-rates: The ACTION trial experience. Contemp Clin Trials. 2007;28:720–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mark SD, Robins JM. Estimating the causal effect of smoking cessation in the presence of confounding factors using a rank preserving structural failure time model. Stat Med. 1993;12:1605–28.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sterne JAC, Tilling K. G-estimation of causal effects, allowing for time-varying confounding. Stata J. 2002;2:164–82.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Filippi A, Gensini G, Bignanimi AA, Sabatini A, Mazzaglia G, Cricelli C. Management of patients with suspected angina, but without known myocardial infarction: a cross-sectional survey. Br J Gen Pract. 2004;54:429–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hemingway H, McCallum A, Shipley M, Manderbacka K, Martikainen P, Keskimaki I. Incidence and prognostic implications of stable angina pectoris among women and men. JAMA. 2006;295:1404–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gibbons RJ, Abrams J, Chatterjee K, Daley J, Deedwania PC, Douglas JS, Ferguson TB Jr, Fihn SD, Fraker TD Jr, Gardin JM, O’Rourke RA, Pasternak RC, Williams SV. American College of Cardiology; American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients With Chronic Stable Angina). ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with chronic stable angina–summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients With Chronic Stable Angina). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41:159–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Daly C, Clemens F, Lopez-Sendon JL, Tavazzi L, Boersma E, Danchin N, Delahaye F, Gitt A, Julian D, Mulcahy D, Ruzyllo W, Thygesen K, Verheugt F. Fox KM; Euro Heart Survey Investigators. The impact of guideline compliant medical therapy on clinical outcome in patients with stable angina: findings from the Euro Heart Survey of stable angina. Eur Heart J. 2006;27:1298–304.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Danchin N, Cambou JP, Hanania G, Kadri Z, Genes N, Lablanche JM, Blanchard D, Vaur L, Clerson P. Guéret P; USIC 2000 investigators. Impact of combined secondary prevention therapy after myocardial infarction: data from a nationwide French registry. Am Heart J. 2005;150:1147–53.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Miettinen OS. The need for randomization in the study of intended effects. Stat Med. 1983;2:267–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hurlen M, Abdelnoor M, Smith P, Erikssen J, Arnesen H. Warfarin, aspirin, or both after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:969–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Boden WE, O’Rourke RA, Teo KK, Hartigan PM, Maron DJ, Kostuk WJ, et al. Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:1503–16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The contribution of investigators, committee members and other study personnel as listed elsewhere is gratefully acknowledged [2], as is the support of Bayer Healthcare AG. Bayer Healthcare AG had no role in the design and conduct of the study; or in the preparation, review and approval of this manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The ACTION trial was funded by Bayer Healthcare AG. S de Brouwer, B-A Kirwan, and J Lubsen were full-time employees of SOCAR Research SA, which managed the study. Z Vokó worked as consultant epidemiologist for SOCAR Research SA. PHJM Dunselman was member of the Critical Events Committee and Nicolas Danchin was Chairman of this committee. JE Otterstad was member of the Steering Committee and one of the country coordinators. Members of committees were funded by SOCAR Research SA to attend meetings related to the trial. Z Vokó, N Danchin, JE Otterstad, PHJM Dunselman, J Lubsen have served as consultants to or received travel expenses, or funding for research from other pharmaceutical companies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zoltán Vokó.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vokó, Z., de Brouwer, S., Lubsen, J. et al. Long-term impact of secondary preventive treatments in patients with stable angina. Eur J Epidemiol 26, 375–383 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-011-9558-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-011-9558-5

Keywords

Navigation