Validating and updating a prediction rule for serious bacterial infection in patients with fever without source
Aim: To externally validate and update a previously developed rule for predicting the presence of serious bacterial infections in children with fever without apparent source. Methods: Patients, 1-36 mo, presenting with fever without source, were prospectively enrolled. Serious bacterial infection included bacterial meningitis, sepsis, bacteraemia, pneumonia, urinary tract infection, bacterial gastroenteritis, osteomyelitis/ethmoiditis. The generalizability of the original rule was determined. Subsequently, the prediction rule was updated using all available data of the patients with fever without source (1996-1998 and 2000-2001, n = 381) using multivariable logistic regression. Results: the generalizability of the rule appeared insufficient in the new patients (n = 150). In the updated rule, independent predictors from history and examination were duration of fever, vomiting, ill clinical appearance, chest-wall retractions and poor peripheral circulation (ROC area (95%CI): 0.69 (0.63-0.75)). Additional independent predictors from laboratory were serum white blood cell count and C-reactive protein, and in urinalysis ≥70 white bloods (ROC area (95%CI): 0.83 (0.78-0.88). Conclusions: A previously developed prediction rule for predicting the presence of serious bacterial infection in children with fever without apparent source was updated. Its clinical score can be used as a first screening tool. Additional laboratory testing may specify the individual risk estimate (range: 4-54%) further.
|Keywords||Bacterial Infections, External Validation, Fever, Prediction Rule, Update|
|Persistent URL||dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.2006.00033.x, hdl.handle.net/1765/36342|
Bleeker, S.E., Derksen-Lubsen, G., Grobbee, D.E., Donders, A.R.T., Moons, K.G.M., & Moll, H.A.. (2007). Validating and updating a prediction rule for serious bacterial infection in patients with fever without source. Acta Paediatrica: promoting child health, 96(1), 100–104. doi:10.1111/j.1651-2227.2006.00033.x