International variations in the treatment and co-morbidity of left ventricular systolic dysfunction: Data from the EuroHeart Failure Survey
Background: Treatment of heart failure (HF) due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) is effective, but many patients are not treated in accordance with guidelines. This may reflect a lack of adequate organisation of care or co-morbidity contra-indicating therapy. Aims: To evaluate the effect of co-morbidities on the prescription of neurohormonal antagonists for HF. Methods and results: The EuroHeart Failure Survey identified 10,701 patients with suspected or confirmed HF during 2000 and 2001, 64% of whom had an imaging test and 3658 had documented LVSD. This last group constitutes the focus of this report. Renal dysfunction was associated with lower prescription of ACE inhibitors at discharge (74% vs. 83%, p < 0.001). Beta-blockers were less often used in patients with respiratory disease (32% vs. 53%, p < 0.001). Co-morbidity did not appear to affect the use of spironolactone. There were few important international differences in uptake of key therapies amongst European countries with widely differing cultures and economic status. Conclusions: Guidelines appear successful in creating a relatively uniform approach to the treatment for HF due to LVSD in diverse medical cultures. Relevant co-morbidity seems to be responsible for a substantial reduction in the prescription of ACE inhibitors and beta-blockers. However, whilst co-morbidity indicates the need for greater caution, it is often not a valid contra-indication to life-saving therapy.
|Keywords||Co-morbidity, Heart failure, Left ventricular systolic dysfunction, Medical treatment, Prognosis|
|Persistent URL||dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejheart.2006.07.007, hdl.handle.net/1765/36815|
Lainščak, M, Cleland, J.G.F, Lenzen, M.J, Follath, F, Komajda, M, & Swedberg, K. (2007). International variations in the treatment and co-morbidity of left ventricular systolic dysfunction: Data from the EuroHeart Failure Survey. European Journal of Heart Failure, 9(3), 292–299. doi:10.1016/j.ejheart.2006.07.007