Aims: Although large clinical trials have shown that everolimus-eluting stents (EES) significantly reduce target vessel revascularisation (TVR), myocardial infarction (MI) and stent thrombosis (ST) compared to paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) in diverse populations, there is a paucity of data comparing EES and PES in patients presenting with MI. Methods and results: We performed a post hoc subgroup analysis on COMPARE, an all-comer trial comparing EES to PES. We identified 863 patients (EES=434, PES=429 treated for MI: 452 ST-elevation MI (STEMI) and 411 non ST-elevation MI (NSTEMI). EES was associated with a significant reduction in the primary endpoint, a composite of all-cause mortality, MI, and TVR, at two years (RR=0.57; 95% CI: 0.40-0.83, p=0.002). While the effect was more marked in the STEMI (RR=0.51; 95% CI: 0.30-0.87, p=0.01) than the NSTEMI subgroup (RR=0.65; 95% CI: 0.39-1.08, p=0.09), the interaction p-value (0.5) suggests that a difference in treatment effect between presentations is unlikely. ST rates were significantly lower with EES (RR=0.30; 95% CI: 0.12-0.73, p=0.005). Conclusions: At two years, EES results are superior to PES in terms of safety and efficacy endpoints in treatment of MI.

, , , , ,
doi.org/10.4244/EIJV7I12A217, hdl.handle.net/1765/74560
EuroIntervention
Department of Cardiology

Kedhi, E., Gomes, M., Joesoef, K. S., Wassing, J., Goedhart, D., McFadden, E., & Smits, P. (2012). Everolimus-eluting stents and paclitaxel-eluting stents in patients presenting with myocardial infarction: Insights from the two-year results of the COMPARE prospective randomised controlled trial. EuroIntervention, 7(12), 1376–1385. doi:10.4244/EIJV7I12A217