<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Sgarbossa, E.B.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/10115/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Non-Q-wave versus Q-wave myocardial infarction after thrombolytic therapy: angiographic and prognostic insights from the global utilization of streptokinase and tissue plasminogen activator for occluded coronary arteries-I angiographic substudy. GUSTO-I Angiographic Investigators (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/8784/</link>
      <pubDate>1998-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: Although the stratification of patients with myocardial
      infarction into ECG subsets based on the presence or absence of new Q
      waves has important clinical and prognostic utility, systematic evaluation
      of the impact of thrombolytic therapy on the subsequent development and
      prognosis of non-Q-wave infarction has been limited to date. METHODS AND
      RESULTS: We examined 12-lead ECG, coronary anatomy, left ventricular
      function, and mortality among 2046 patients with ST-segment elevation
      infarction from the Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue
      Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries angiographic subset
      to gain further insight into the pathophysiology and prognosis of Q-
      versus non-Q-wave infarction in the thrombolytic era. Non-Q-wave
      infarction developed in 409 patients (20%) after thrombolytic therapy.
      Compared with Q-wave patients, non-Q-wave patients were more likely to
      present with lesser ST-segment elevation in a nonanterior location. The
      infarct-related artery in non-Q-wave patients was more likely to be
      nonanterior (67% versus 58%, P=.012) and distally located (33% versus 39%,
      P=.021). Early (90-minute, 77% versus 65%, P=.001) and complete (54%
      versus 44%, P&lt;.001) infarct-related artery patency was greater among the
      non-Q-wave group. Non-Q-wave patients had better global (ejection
      fraction, 66% versus 57%; P&lt;.0001) and regional left ventricular function
      (10 versus 24 abnormal chords, P=.0001). In-hospital, 30-day, 1-year, and
      2-year (6.3% versus 10.1%, P=.02) mortality rates were lower among
      non-Q-wave patients. CONCLUSIONS: The excellent prognosis among the
      subgroup of patients who develop non-Q-wave infarction after thrombolysis
      is related to early, complete, and sustained infarct-related artery
      patency with resultant limitation of left ventricular infarction and
      dysfunction.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>