<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Muradin, G.S.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/10160/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Percutaneous treatment of peripheral arterial disease (Doctoral Thesis)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/32023/</link>
      <pubDate>2002-10-30T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>This thesis presents 7 studies that examined the results of balloon
dilation and stent placement performed for treatment of Peripheral
Arterial Disease (PAD). The first 2 studies (chapter 2 and 3) explored the
prognostic value of baseline characteristics on the outcome of the
intervention. The outcome measures considered included occurrence of
complications. improvement in ABI. and improvement in symptomatic
status. The main results were that symptomatic status prior to intervention
and renal function are important independent predictors of the occurrence
of a systemic complication and that symptomatic status. diabetic status,
lesion length, severity of stenosis, lesion localization, arterial runoff are
important independent predictors for failure to improve symptomatic
status and failure to improve the ABI. Furthermore the results showed
that patients with lesions shorter than 10 em had a better prognosis than
patients with lesions longer than 10 em. Within the group of patients with
lesions shorter than 10 em no difference in prognosis was detected.
Patients treated for severe stenoses or even occlusions had a better
prognosis on improvement of symptomatic status or ABI than patients
treated with milder stenoses</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Cost and patency rate targets for the development of endovascular devices to treat femoropopliteal arterial disease (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9586/</link>
      <pubDate>2001-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>PURPOSE: To determine the criteria that would make use of an endovascular
          device cost-effective compared with bypass surgery and percutaneous
          transluminal angioplasty in the treatment of femoropopliteal arterial
          disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A decision model was developed to compare
          treatment with the use of a hypothetical endovascular device with
          established therapies. Cost-effectiveness from the perspective of the
          health care system was considered. Outcome measures were lifetime costs
          and quality-adjusted life-years. With the use of net health benefit
          calculations and threshold analysis, combinations of costs and patency
          rates were determined that would make the device cost-effective compared
          with established therapies. In subgroup and sensitivity analyses, the
          effect on decision-making of sex, age, indication, lesion type, procedural
          risk, and society's willingness to pay for incremental gain in health were
          explored. RESULTS: Use of a device that costs $3,000 would be
          cost-effective compared with bypass surgery for critical ischemia if the
          5-year patency rate is 29%-46%. Use of the same device would be
          cost-effective compared with angioplasty for disabling claudication and
          stenosis if the 5-year patency rate is 69%-86%. CONCLUSION: The target
          combinations of costs and patency rates found in this study are probably
          attainable, and further development of such endovascular devices seems
          warranted.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Balloon dilation and stent implantation for treatment of femoropopliteal arterial disease: meta-analysis (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9763/</link>
      <pubDate>2001-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>PURPOSE: To perform a meta-analysis of long-term results of balloon
      dilation and stent implantation in the treatment of femoropopliteal
      arterial disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The English-language literature
      was searched for studies published between 1993 and 2000. Inclusion
      criteria for articles were presentation of long-term primary patency
      rates, standard errors (explicitly reported or derivable), and baseline
      characteristics of the study population. Two reviewers independently
      extracted data, and discrepancies were resolved by consensus. Primary
      patency rates were combined by using a technique that allows adjustment
      for differences across study populations. Analyses were adjusted for
      lesion type and clinical indication. RESULTS: Nineteen studies met the
      inclusion criteria, representing 923 balloon dilations and 473 stent
      implantations. Combined 3-year patency rates after balloon dilation were
      61% (standard error, 2.2%) for stenoses and claudication, 48% (standard
      error, 3.3%) for occlusions and claudication, 43% (standard error, 4.1%)
      for stenoses and critical ischemia, and 30% (standard error, 3.7%) for
      occlusions and critical ischemia. The 3-year patency rates after stent
      implantation were 63%-66% (standard error, 4.1%) and were independent of
      clinical indication and lesion type. Funnel plots demonstrated an
      asymmetric distribution of the data points associated with stent studies.
      CONCLUSION: Balloon dilation and stent implantation for claudication and
      stenosis yield similar long-term patency rates. For more severe
      femoropopliteal disease, the results of stent implantation seem more
      favorable. Publication bias could not be ruled out.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>