<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Evers, J.L.H.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/10164/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Risk of borderline and invasive ovarian tumours after ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization in a large Dutch cohort (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/33732/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-12-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Background: Long-term effects of ovarian stimulation for IVF on the risk of ovarian malignancies are unknown.Methods: We identified a nationwide historic cohort of 19 146 women who received IVF treatment in the Netherlands between 1983 and 1995, and a comparison group of 6006 subfertile women not treated with IVF. In 19971999, data on reproductive risk factors were obtained from 65 of women and data on subfertility (treatment) were obtained from the medical records. The incidence of ovarian malignancies (including borderline ovarian tumours) through 2007 was assessed through linkage with disease registries. The risk of ovarian malignancies in the IVF group was compared with risks in the general population and the subfertile comparison group.Results: After a median follow-up of 14.7 years, the risk of borderline ovarian tumours was increased in the IVF group compared with the general population [standardized incidence ratio (SIR) 1.76; 95 confidence interval (CI) 1.162.56]. The overall SIR for invasive ovarian cancer was not significantly elevated, but increased with longer follow-up after first IVF (P 0.02); the SIR was 3.54 (95 CI 1.626.72) after 15 years. The risks of borderline ovarian tumours and of all ovarian malignancies combined in the IVF group were significantly increased compared with risks in the subfertile comparison group (hazard ratios 4.23; 95 CI 1.2514.33 and 2.14; 95 CI 1.074.25, respectively, adjusted for age, parity and subfertility cause). Conclusions: Ovarian stimulation for IVF may increase the risk of ovarian malignancies, especially borderline ovarian tumours. More large cohort studies are needed to confirm these findings and to examine the effect of IVF treatment characteristics. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Long term costs and effects of reducing the number of twin pregnancies in IVF by single embryo transfer: The TwinSing study (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/28451/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-10-20T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Background: Pregnancies induced by in vitro fertilisation (IVF) often result in twin gestations, which are associated with both maternal and perinatal complications. An effective way to reduce the number of IVF twin pregnancies is to decrease the number of embryos transferred from two to one. The interpretation of current studies is limited because they used live birth as outcome measure and because they applied limited time horizons. So far, research on long-term outcomes of IVF twins and singletons is scarce and inconclusive. The objective of this study is to investigate the short (1-year) and long-term (5 and 18-year) costs and health outcomes of IVF singleton and twin children and to consider these in estimating the cost-effectiveness of single embryo transfer compared with double embryo transfer, from a societal and a healthcare perspective.Methods/Design: A multi-centre cohort study will be performed, in which IVF singletons and IVF twin children born between 2003 and 2005 of whom parents received IVF treatment in one of the five participating Dutch IVF centres, will be compared. Data collection will focus on children at risk of health problems and children in whom health problems actually occurred. First year of life data will be collected in approximately 1,278 children (619 singletons and 659 twin children). Data up to the fifth year of life will be collected in approximately 488 children (200 singletons and 288 twin children). Outcome measures are health status, health-related quality of life and costs. Data will be obtained from hospital information systems, a parent questionnaire and existing registries. Furthermore, a prognostic model will be developed that reflects the short and long-term costs and health outcomes of IVF singleton and twin children. This model will be linked to a Markov model of the short-term cost-effectiveness of single embryo transfer strategies versus double embryo transfer strategies to enable the calculation of the long-term cost-effectiveness.Discussion: This is, to our knowledge, the first study that investigates the long-term costs and health outcomes of IVF singleton and twin children and the long-term cost-effectiveness of single embryo transfer strategies versus double embryo transfer strategies. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Two new prediction rules for spontaneous pregnancy leading to live birth among subfertile couples, based on the synthesis of three previous models. (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/13422/</link>
      <pubDate>2004-09-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: Several models have been published for the prediction of
      spontaneous pregnancy among subfertile patients. The aim of this study was
      to broaden the empirical basis for these predictions by making a synthesis
      of three previously published models. METHODS: We used the original data
      from the studies of Eimers et al. (1994), Collins et al. (1995) and Snick
      et al. (1997) on couples consulting for various forms of subfertility. We
      developed a so-called three-sample synthesis model for predicting
      spontaneous conception leading to live birth within 1 year after intake
      based on the three data sets. The predictors used are duration of
      subfertility, women's age, primary or secondary infertility, percentage of
      motile sperm, and whether the couple was referred by a general
      practitioner or by a gynaecologist (referral status). The performance of
      this model was assessed according to a 'jack-knife' analysis. Because the
      post-coital test (PCT) was not assessed in one of the samples, a synthesis
      model including the PCT was based on two samples only. RESULTS: The
      ability of the synthesis models to distinguish between women who became
      pregnant and those who did not was comparable to the ability of the
      one-sample models when applied in the other samples. The reliability of
      the predictions by the three-sample synthesis model was somewhat better.
      Predictions improved considerably by including the PCT. CONCLUSIONS: The
      synthesis models performed better and had a broader empirical basis than
      the original models. They are therefore better suitable for application in
      other centres.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Towards less confusing terminology in reproductive medicine: a proposal. (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/13434/</link>
      <pubDate>2004-07-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The use of the term "infertility" and related terms in reproductive
      medicine is reviewed. Current terminology is found to be ambiguous,
      confusing and misleading. We recommend that the fertility investigation
      report of a couple should consist of statements concerning description,
      diagnosis and prognosis. The description concerns the duration of
      non-pregnancy before consulting the clinician. A system for prognostic
      grading is proposed. The fertility investigation report forms the basis
      for further action, including the possibility of waiting with treatment in
      case of almost normal or only slightly reduced fertility. The use of the
      terms infertility, subfertility and fecundity is not necessary, and it is
      recommended to avoid them.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Alternative approaches in IVF (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/31839/</link>
      <pubDate>2002-02-26T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Various new developments in clinical and basic science which may impact on IVF in the near or distant future will be discussed in this review. These key areas include the regulation of early follicle development and the extended in vitro culture of oocytes and embryos. Moreover, alternative compounds and ovarian stimulation protocols will be discussed, along with highlights in the development of the cryopreservation of excess oocytes or embryos. Finally, the health economics of IVF is addressed.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Alternative approaches in IVF (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9863/</link>
      <pubDate>2002-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Various new developments in clinical and basic science which may impact on
      IVF in the near or distant future will be discussed in this review. These
      key areas include the regulation of early follicle development and the
      extended in-vitro culture of oocytes and embryos. Moreover, alternative
      compounds and ovarian stimulation protocols will be discussed, along with
      highlights in the development of the cryopreservation of excess oocytes or
      embryos. Finally, the health economics of IVF is addressed.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>