<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Smeenk, H.G.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/10381/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Surgical and Adjuvant Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer (Doctoral Thesis)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/13713/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-05-29T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Pancreatic cancer, including ampullary, distal bile duct and pancreatic head cancer,
is one of the most lethal human cancers and still is a major unsolved health problem
at the start of the 21st century. It has been estimated that this disease causes 30.000
deaths per year in the USA with an incidence of 9-10 cases per 100.000 and slightly
increased male: female and black: white ratios. The incidence of pancreatic cancer
in the Netherlands is approximately 8.4 per 100.000 patients. This number has
been quite steady over the past ten years. Pancreatic cancer currently ranks as the
fifth most common cause of cancer related deaths in the western countries. Over the
past 20 years the disease continuous to have an appalling prognosis with less than
1% of patients surviving more than 5 years from diagnosis, so that mortality rates
and annual incidence are virtually identical.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy versus standard Whipple procedure: a prospective, randomized, multicenter analysis of 170 patients with pancreatic and periampullary tumors (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/10365/</link>
      <pubDate>2004-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>OBJECTIVE: A prospective randomized multicenter study was performed to
      assess whether the results of pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy
      (PPPD) equal those of the standard Whipple (SW) operation, especially with
      respect to duration of surgery, blood loss, hospital stay, delayed gastric
      emptying (DGE), and survival. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: PPPD has been
      associated with a higher incidence of delayed gastric emptying, resulting
      in a prolonged period of postoperative nasogastric suctioning. Another
      criticism of the pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy for patients
      with a malignancy is the radicalness of the resection. On the other hand,
      PPPD might be associated with a shorter operation time and less blood
      loss. METHODS: A prospective randomized multicenter study was performed in
      a nonselected series of 170 consecutive patients. All patients with
      suspicion of pancreatic or periampullary tumor were included and
      randomized for a SW or a PPPD resection. Data concerning patients'
      demographics, intraoperative and histologic findings, as well as
      postoperative mortality, morbidity, and follow-up up to 115 months after
      discharge, were analyzed. RESULTS: There were no significant differences
      noted in age, sex distribution, tumor localization, and staging. There
      were no differences in median blood loss and duration of operation between
      the 2 techniques. DGE was observed equally in the 2 groups. There was only
      a marginal difference in postoperative weight loss in favor of the
      standard Whipple procedure. Overall operative mortality was 5.3%. Tumor
      positive resection margins were found for 12 patients of the SW group and
      19 patients of the PPPD group (P &lt; 0.23). Long-term follow-up showed no
      significant statistical differences in survival between the 2 groups (P &lt;
      0.90). CONCLUSIONS: The SW and PPPD operations were associated with
      comparable operation time, blood loss, hospital stay, mortality,
      morbidity, and incidence of DGE. The overall long-term and disease-free
      survival was comparable in both groups. Both surgical procedures are
      equally effective for the treatment of pancreatic and periampullary
      carcinoma.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>