<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Barneveld, E.M. van</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/10595/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Risk sharing between competing health plans and sponsors (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9767/</link>
      <pubDate>2001-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>In many countries, competing health plans receive capitation payments from
      a sponsor, whether government or a private employer. All capitation
      payment methods are far from perfect and have raised concerns about risk
      selection. Paying health plans partly on the basis of capitation and
      partly on the basis of actual costs ("risk sharing") reduces plans'
      incentives for selection but sacrifices some incentives for efficiency.
      This paper summarizes our empirical research on Dutch health plans with
      respect to various forms of risk sharing. All sponsors can improve their
      payment systems by either implementing or changing their form of risk
      sharing.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Risk sharing as a supplement to imperfect capitation in health insurance: a tt-adeoff between selection and efficiency (Doctoral Thesis)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/21110/</link>
      <pubDate>2000-05-18T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description></description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Risk-adjusted capitation: recent experiences in The Netherlands (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/8567/</link>
      <pubDate>1994-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The market-oriented health care reforms taking place in the Netherlands
          show a clear resemblance to the proposals for managed competition in U.S.
          health care. In both countries good risk adjustment mechanisms that
          prevent cream skimming--that is, that prevent plans from selecting the
          best health risks--are critical to the success of the reforms. In this
          paper we present an overview of the Dutch reforms and of our research
          concerning risk-adjusted capitation payments. Although we are optimistic
          about the technical possibilities for solving the problem of cream
          skimming, the implementation of good risk-adjusted capitation is a
          long-term challenge.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>