<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Kozuma, K.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/1060/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Value of coronary stenotic flow velocity acceleration in prediction of angiographic restenosis following balloon angioplasty (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/10021/</link>
      <pubDate>2002-12-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>INTRODUCTION: Quantitative angiographic assessment after balloon angioplasty is a poor predictor of immediate and long-term outcome. However, the measurement of blood flow velocity during angioplasty has been proved clinically useful. AIMS: To analyse the value of the maximal stenotic flow velocity and the presence of stenotic flow velocity acceleration (aSV) for the long-term outcome after balloon angioplasty. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients undergoing single lesion angioplasty within the DEBATE trial were included. aSV was defined as acceleration in the stenotic coronary flow velocity &gt;50% baseline velocity assessed at a reference site of the target vessel. After balloon angioplasty diameter stenosis, minimal lumen diameter (MLD) and coronary flow velocity reserve were similar between the aSV (n=54) and non-aSV group (n=125). At follow-up, the aSV group had a higher restenosis rate (52% vs 30%, P=0.006) The presence of aSV was the strongest independent predictor of restenosis (OR 3.08, 95% CI 1.35 to 7.05, P=0.008). The best predictive cut-off value of SV was 101cm.s(-1) (sensitivity of 46%, specificity of 81%, positive predictive value of 85% and a negative predictive value of 58%). CONCLUSION: Following angioplasty, SV appears to be exquisitely sensitive to the changes experienced at the treated area without depending on the status of the microcirculation.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Routine intracoronary beta-irradiation. Acute and one year outcome in patients at high risk for recurrence of stenosis (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9929/</link>
      <pubDate>2002-07-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>AIMS: Intracoronary radiation is a promising therapy potentially reducing restenosis following catheter-based interventions. Currently, only limited data on this treatment are available. The feasibility and outcome in daily routine practice, however, is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 100 consecutive patients, intracoronary beta-radiation was performed with a (90)Strontium system (Novoste Beta-Cathtrade mark) following angioplasty. Predominantly complex (73% type B2 and C) and long lesions (length 24.3+/-15.3 mm) were included (37% de novo, 19% restenotic and 44% in-stent restenotic lesions). Radiation success was 100%. Mean prescribed dose was 19.8+/-2.5 Gy. A pullback procedure was performed in 19% lesions. Geographic miss occurred in 8% lesions. Periprocedural thrombus formation occurred in four lesions, dissection in nine lesions. During hospital stay, no death, acute myocardial infarction, or repeat revascularization was observed. Major adverse cardiac events occurred predominantly between 6 and 12 months after the index procedure with major adverse cardiac event-free survival of 66% at 12 months (one death, 10 Q-wave myocardial infarctions, 23 target vessel revascularizations; ranked for worst event). CONCLUSION: Routine catheter-based intracoronary beta-radiation therapy after angioplasty is safe and feasible with a high acute procedural success. The clinical 1-year follow-up showed delayed occurrence of major adverse cardiac events between 6 and 12 months after the index procedure</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Initial observation regarding changes in vessel dimensions after balloon angioplasty and stenting followed by catheter-based beta-radiation. Is stenting necessary in the setting of catheter-based radiotherapy? (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/13059/</link>
      <pubDate>2002-04-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>AIMS: We sought to compare the effect of intracoronary beta-radiation on the vessel dimensions in de novo lesions using three-dimensional intravascular ultrasound quantification after balloon angioplasty and stenting. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty patients (44 vessels; 28 balloon angioplasty and 16 stenting) treated with catheter-based beta-radiation and 18 non-irradiated control patients (18 vessels; 10 balloon angioplasty and 8 stenting) were investigated by means of three-dimensional volumetric intravascular ultrasound analysis post-procedure and at 6-8 months follow-up. Total vessel (EEM) volume enlarged after both balloon angioplasty and stenting (+37 mm(3) vs +42 mm(3), P=ns), but vessel wall volume (plaque plus media) also increased similarly (+33 mm(3) vs +49 mm(3), P=ns) in the irradiated patients. Lumen volume remained unchanged in both groups (+3 mm(3) vs -7 mm(3), P=ns). In the stent-covered segments, neointima at follow-up was significantly smaller in the irradiated group than the control group (8 mm(3) vs 27 mm(3), P=0.001, respectively), but the total amount of tissue growth was similar in both groups (33 mm(3) vs 29 mm(3), P=ns). CONCLUSIONS: Intracoronary beta-radiation induces vessel enlargement after balloon angioplasty and/or stenting, accommodating tissue growth. Additional stenting may not play an important role in the prevention of constrictive remodelling in the setting of catheter-based intracoronary beta-radiotherapy.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Angiographical follow-up after radioactive "Cold Ends" stent implantation: a multicenter trial. (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9837/</link>
      <pubDate>2002-02-05T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: Radioactive stents with an activity of 0.75 to 12 microCi have shown &gt;40% edge restenosis due to neointimal hyperplasia and negative remodeling. This trial evaluated whether radioactive Cold Ends stents might resolve edge restenosis by preventing remodeling at the injured extremities. METHODS AND RESULTS: The 25-mm long (15-mm radioactive center and 5-mm nonradioactive ends) Cold Ends stents had an activity of 3 to 12 microCi at implantation. Forty-three stents were implanted in 43 patients with de novo native coronary artery disease. Two procedural, 1 subacute, and 1 late stent thrombosis occurred. A restenosis rate of 22% was observed with a shift of the restenosis, usually occurring at the stent edges of radioactive stents, into the Cold Ends stents. The most severe restenosis occurred at the transition zone from radioactive to nonradioactive segments, a region located in dose fall-off. CONCLUSION: Cold Ends stents did not resolve edge restenosis.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>The bright and the dark sides of brachytherapy: mechanisms of stenosis reduction and findings of intracoronary β-radiation therapy revealed by IVUS-3D and QCA (Doctoral Thesis)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/23521/</link>
      <pubDate>2001-09-19T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Sincethe first percutaneous coronary intervention, 24 years ago, the field of interventional
cardiology has continued to grow rapidly. Although PTCA has demonstrated superiority
to medical therapy in alleviating angina, restenosis and acute closure of the treated
vessel remained major limitations. Stent has improved both problems by preventing
residual dissection, elastic recoil and negative remodeling. However, the occurrence
of restenosis after stenting remains unresolved. Furthermore, in-stent restenosis has
become a new enemy in the field of interventional cardiology, since the conventional
treatment of in-stent restenosis is rather disappointing with high restenosis rates (around
30 - 70%). Therefore, the holy grail to overcome this immense enemy went unabated.
Intracoronary brachytherapy is a powerful therapy to prevent restenosis after percutaneous
transluminal coronary intervention. The purpose of this thesis is to explore the
mechanism of action of intracoronary radiation and the problems related to this
procedure. For this purpose, three-dimensional intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and
quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) were applied as investigational tools.
This thesis consists of 2 parts; the first part deals with the positive aspect of intracoronary
brachytherapy which explains its increasing application (Chapter 2) and its mechanistic
interpretation (Chapters 3-7). The second part reports on the dark sides of intracoronary
brachytherapy (Chapters 8-12).</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>The pattern of restenosis and vascular remodelling after cold-end radioactive stent implantation. (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/4825/</link>
      <pubDate>2001-08-22T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Background Edge restenosis is a major problem after radioactive stenting. The cold-end stent has a radioactive mid-segment (15·9mm) and non-radioactive proximal and distal 5·7mm segments. Conceptually this may negate the impact of negative vascular remodelling at the edge of the radiation.

Method and Results ECG-gated intravascular ultrasound with three-dimensional reconstruction was performed post-stent implantation and at the 6-month follow-up to assess restenosis within the margins of the stent and at the stent edges in 16 patients. Angiographic restenosis was witnessed in four patients, all in the proximal in-stent position. By intravascular ultrasound in-stent neointimal hyperplasia, with a &gt;50% stented cross-sectional area, was seen in eight patients. This was witnessed proximally (n=2), distally (n=2) and in both segments (n=4). Echolucent tissue, dubbed the ‘black hole’ was seen as a significant component of neointimal hyperplasia in six out of the eight cases of restenosis. Neointimal hyperplasia was inhibited in the area of radiation: Δ neointimal hyperplasia=3·72mm3(8·6%); in-stent at the edges of radiation proximally and distally Δ neointimal hyperplasia was 7·9mm3(19·0%) and 11·4mm3(25·6%), respectively (P=0·017). At the stent edges there was no significant change in lumen volume.

Conclusions Cold-end stenting results in increased neointimal hyperplasia in in-stent non-radioactive segments.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Uncomplicated moderate coronary artery dissections after balloon angioplasty: good outcome without stenting (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/8301/</link>
      <pubDate>2001-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>OBJECTIVE: To study the relation between moderate coronary dissections, coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR), and long term outcome. METHODS: 523 patients undergoing balloon angioplasty and sequential intracoronary Doppler measurements were examined as part of the DEBATE II trial (Doppler endpoints balloon angioplasty trial Europe). After successful balloon angioplasty, patients were randomised to stenting or no further treatment. Dissections were graded at the core laboratory by two observers and divided into four categories: none, mild (type A-B), moderate (type C), severe (types D to F). Patients with severe dissections (n = 128) or without available reference vessel CFVR (n = 139) were excluded. The remaining 256 patients were divided into two groups according to the presence (group A, n = 45) or absence (group B, n = 211) of moderate dissection. RESULTS: Following balloon angioplasty, there was no difference in CFVR between the two groups. At 12 months follow up, a higher rate of major adverse cardiac events was observed overall in group A than in group B (10 (22%) v 23 (11%), p = 0.041). However, the risk of major adverse events was similar in the subgroups receiving balloon angioplasty (group A, 6 (19%) v group B, 16 (16%), NS). Among group A patients, the adverse events risk was greater in those randomised to stenting (odds ratios 6.603 v 1.197, p = 0.046), whereas there was no difference in risk if the group was analysed according to whether the CFVR was &lt; 2.5 or &gt;/= 2.5 after balloon angioplasty. CONCLUSIONS: Moderate dissections left untreated result in no increased risk of major adverse cardiac events. Additional stenting does not improve the long term outcome.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Three dimensional intravascular ultrasonic assessment of the local mechanism of restenosis after balloon angioplasty (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/8349/</link>
      <pubDate>2001-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>OBJECTIVE: To assess the mechanism of restenosis after balloon angioplasty. DESIGN: Prospective study. PATIENTS: 13 patients treated with balloon angioplasty. INTERVENTIONS: 111 coronary subsegments (2 mm each) were analysed after balloon angioplasty and at a six month follow up using three dimensional intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Qualitative and quantitative IVUS analysis. Total vessel (external elastic membrane), plaque, and lumen volume were measured in each 2 mm subsegment. Delta values were calculated (follow up - postprocedure). Remodelling was defined as any (positive or negative) change in total vessel volume. RESULTS: Positive remodelling was observed in 52 subsegments while negative remodelling occurred in 44. Remodelling, plaque type, and dissection were heterogeneously distributed along the coronary segments. Plaque composition was not associated with changes in IVUS indices, whereas dissected subsegments had a greater increase in total vessel volume than those without dissection (1.7 mm(3) v -0.33 mm(3), p = 0.04). Change in total vessel volume was correlated with changes in lumen (p &lt; 0.05, r = 0.56) and plaque volumes (p &lt; 0.05, r = 0.64). The site with maximum lumen loss was not the same site as the minimum lumen area at follow up in the majority (n = 10) of the vessels. In the multivariate model, residual plaque burden had an influence on negative remodelling (p = 0.001, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.391 to -0.108), whereas dissection had an effect on total vessel increase (p = 0.002, 95% CI 1.168 to 4.969). CONCLUSIONS: The mechanism of lumen renarrowing after balloon angioplasty appears to be determined by unfavourable remodelling. However, different patterns of remodelling may occur in individual injured coronary segments, which highlights the complexity and influence of local factors in the restenotic process.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Radioactive stents delay but do not prevent in-stent neointimal hyperplasia (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9562/</link>
      <pubDate>2001-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: Restenosis after conventional stenting is almost exclusively caused by neointimal hyperplasia. Beta-particle-emitting radioactive stents decrease in-stent neointimal hyperplasia at 6-month follow-up. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the 1-year outcome of (32)P radioactive stents with an initial activity of 6 to 12 microCi using serial quantitative coronary angiography and volumetric ECG-gated 3D intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). METHODS AND RESULTS: Of 40 patients undergoing initial stent implantation, 26 were event-free after the 6-month follow-up period and 22 underwent repeat catheterization and IVUS at 1 year; they comprised half of the study population. Significant luminal deterioration was observed within the stents between 6 months and 1 year, as evidenced by a decrease in the angiographic minimum lumen diameter (-0.43+/-0.56 mm; P:=0.028) and in the mean lumen diameter in the stent (-0.55+/-0. 63 mm; P:=0.001); a significant increase in in-stent neointimal hyperplasia by IVUS (18.16+/-12.59 mm(3) at 6 months to 27.75+/-11. 99 mm(3) at 1 year; P:=0.001) was also observed. Target vessel revascularization was performed in 5 patients (23%). No patient experienced late occlusion, myocardial infarction, or death. By 1 year, 21 of the initial 40 patients (65%) remained event-free. CONCLUSIONS: Neointimal proliferation is delayed rather than prevented by radioactive stent implantation. Clinical outcome 1 year after the implantation of stents with an initial activity of 6 to 12 microCi is not favorable when compared with conventional stenting.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Nonfluoroscopic endoventricular electromechanical three-dimensional mapping: current status and future perspectives (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9712/</link>
      <pubDate>2001-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description></description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Sustained suppression of neointimal proliferation by sirolimus-eluting stents: one-year angiographic and intravascular ultrasound follow-up (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9778/</link>
      <pubDate>2001-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: We have previously reported a virtual absence of neointimal hyperplasia 4 months after implantation of sirolimus-eluting stents. The aim of the present investigation was to determine whether these results are sustained over a period of 1 year. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty-five patients with de novo coronary disease were successfully treated with the implantation of a single sirolimus-eluting Bx VELOCITY stent in Sao Paulo, Brazil (n=30, 15 fast release [group I, GI] and 15 slow release [GII]) and Rotterdam, The Netherlands (15 slow release, GIII). Angiographic and volumetric intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) follow-up was obtained at 4 and 12 months (GI and GII) and 6 months (GIII). In-stent minimal lumen diameter and percent diameter stenosis remained essentially unchanged in all groups (at 12 months, GI and GII; at 6 months, GIII). Follow-up in-lesion minimal lumen diameter was 2.28 mm (GIII), 2.32 mm (GI), and 2.48 mm (GII). No patient approached the &gt;/=50% diameter stenosis at 1 year by angiography or IVUS assessment, and no edge restenosis was observed. Neointimal hyperplasia, as detected by IVUS, was virtually absent at 6 months (2+/-5% obstruction volume, GIII) and at 12 months (GI=2+/-5% and GII=2+/-3%). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates a sustained suppression of neointimal proliferation by sirolimus-eluting Bx VELOCITY stents 1 year after implantation.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Relationship between tensile stress and plaque growth after balloon angioplasty treated with and without intracoronary beta-brachytherapy. (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/12895/</link>
      <pubDate>2000-12-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>AIMS: We investigated the influence of tensile stress on plaque growth after balloon angioplasty with and without beta-radiation therapy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty-one consecutive patients successfully treated with balloon angioplasty were analysed qualitatively and quantitatively by means of an ECG-gated three-dimensional intravascular ultrasound post-procedure and at follow-up. Eighteen patients were irradiated with catheter-based beta-radiation ((90)Sr/(90)Y source) and 13 were not (control). Studied segments were divided into 2 mm subsegments. Thus 184 irradiated and 111 non-irradiated subsegments were included. Tensile stress was calculated according to Laplace's law. The radiation dose was calculated by means of dose-volume histograms. Plaque growth was positively correlated to tensile stress in both the radiation and control groups (r=0.374, P=0.0001 and r=0.305, P=0.001). Low-dose subsegments (&lt;6 Gy) had a significant correlation (r=0.410, P=0.0001) whereas no correlation was observed in the effective-dose subsegments (&gt; or = 6 Gy). Multivariate analysis identified tensile stress as the only independent predictor of plaque increase in non-irradiated subsegments, whereas actual dose and plaque morphology were stronger predictors in irradiated subsegments. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that plaque growth is related to tensile stress after balloon angioplasty. Intracoronary brachytherapy may alter the biophysical process on plaque growth when the prescribed dose is effectively delivered.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Angiographic and clinical outcome of mild to moderate nonocclusive unstented coronary artery dissection and the influence on coronary flow velocity reserve (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/4874/</link>
      <pubDate>2000-08-15T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Limited data are available regarding the angiographic healing rate and physiologic impact of coronary artery dissections. Therefore, we studied the impact of coronary dissections on coronary flow velocity and outcome as well as their healing rate at 6-month follow-up balloon angioplasty. Of 297 patients who underwent balloon angioplasty, 225 underwent intracoronary Doppler measurements and 184 had Doppler and angiographic assessment at 6-month follow-up. Dissections were scored by an independent core lab (Cardialysis BV) and divided in 4 groups: mild (types A to B), moderate (type C), severe (D to F), and patients without dissections. Severe dissections (types D to F) were excluded from the analysis. Clinical, angiographic, and Doppler data were compared among the remaining 3 patient groups. From the 67 dissections detected after balloon angioplasty, only 3 (4.5%) remained unhealed at follow-up. Immediately after balloon angioplasty, the moderate dissection group was associated with a lower coronary flow velocity reserve than the patients with mild (2.16 +/- 0.60 vs 2.82 +/- 1.00, p = 0.037) or no dissections (2.16 +/- 0.60 vs 2.71 +/- 0.88, p = 0.046), respectively. In addition, higher recurrence of angina at 30 days was observed in the moderate group rather than in the mild group (5 [50%] vs 8 [16%], p = 0.0160) and in the patients without dissections (11 [12%], p = 0.007). After standard balloon angioplasty, the occurrence of unhealed dissections is a rare phenomenon. An impaired coronary flow reserve was observed after the development of nonocclusive type C dissections, which was associated with a worse short-term outcome.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Three-dimensional intravascular ultrasonic volumetric quantification of stent recoil and neointimal formation of two new generation tubular stents (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/4905/</link>
      <pubDate>2000-01-15T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Currently, several different designs of coronary stents are available. However, only a few of the new generation stents have been investigated in large randomized trials. Mechanical behavior of first-generation stents (Palmaz-Schatz, Gianturco-Roubin) may not be applied to the new designs. We investigated the chronic mechanical behavior (recoil) of 2 stents recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration (MULTILINK and NIR). Forty-eight patients with single-stent implantation (23 MULTILINK and 25 NIR) were assessed by means of volumetric 3-dimensional intravascular ultrasound analysis after the procedure and at 6-month follow-up. In addition, volumetric assessment of neointimal formation was performed. No significant chronic stent recoil was detected in both groups (Δ MULTILINK stent volume: +5.6 ± 41 mm3 [p = NS] and Δ NIR stent volume + 2.1 ± 26 mm3 [p = NS]). A similar degree of neointimal formation at 6 months was observed between the 2 stents (MULTILINK 46 ± 31.9 mm3 vs NIR 39.9 ± 27.6 mm3, p = NS). In conclusion, these 2 second-generation tubular stents did not show chronic recoil and appeared to promote similar proliferative response after implantation in human coronary arteries.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Coronary stent implantation in a septal perforator artery: case report and review of the literature. (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/4865/</link>
      <pubDate>2000-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Septal perforator arteries play an important role in the blood supply of the anterior interventricular septum. Their intramyocardial course makes them inaccessible for coronary bypass revascularization. Although modern catheter-based techniques might be superior to coronary bypass grafting in offering the most complete revascularization in selected patient populations, a systematic review of the literature revealed a paucity of data regarding the outcome of these patients. The present report describes coronary stent implantation in a dominant septal perforator artery and the analysis of the anatomic relationship between the stent and the intraventricular septum using a new imaging technique, catheter-based intracardiac ultrasound.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Positive Geometric Vascular Remodeling Is Seen After Catheter-Based Radiation Followed by Conventional Stent Implantation but Not After Radioactive Stent Implantation (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/4868/</link>
      <pubDate>2000-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Background—Recent reports demonstrate that intracoronary radiation affects not only neointimal formation but also vascular remodeling. Radioactive stents and catheter-based techniques deliver radiation in different ways, suggesting that different patterns of remodeling after each technique may be expected.

Methods and Results—We analyzed remodeling in 18 patients after conventional stent implantation, 16 patients after low-activity radioactive stent implantation, 16 patients after higher activity radioactive stent implantation, and, finally, 17 patients who underwent catheter-based radiation followed by conventional stent implantation. Intravascular ultrasound with 3D reconstruction was used after stent implantation and at the 6-month follow-up to assess remodeling within the stent margins and at its edges. Preprocedural characteristics were similar between groups. In-stent neointimal hyperplasia (NIH) was inhibited by high-activity radioactive stent implantation (NIH 9.0 mm3) and by catheter-based radiation followed by conventional stent implantation (NIH 6.9 mm3) compared with low-activity radioactive stent implantation (NIH 21.2 mm3) and conventional stent implantation (NIH 20.8 mm3) (P=0.008). No difference in plaque or total vessel volume was seen behind the stent in the conventional, low-activity, or high-activity stent implantation groups. However, significant increases in plaque behind the stent (15%) and in total vessel volume (8%) were seen in the group that underwent catheter-based radiation followed by conventional stent implantation. All 4 groups demonstrated significant late lumen loss at the stent edges; however, edge restenosis was seen only in the group subjected to high-activity stent implantation and appeared to be due to an increase in plaque and, to a lesser degree, to negative remodeling.

Conclusions—Distinct differences in the patterns of remodeling exist between conventional, radioactive, and catheter-based radiotherapy with stenting.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Geographic Miss (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/4889/</link>
      <pubDate>2000-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Background—A recognized limitation of endovascular ß-radiation therapy is the development of new stenosis at the edges of the irradiated area. The combination of injury and low-dose radiation may be the precursor of this phenomenon. We translated the radio-oncological concept of "geographic miss" to define cases in which the radiation source did not fully cover the injured area. The aims of the study were to determine the incidence and causes of geographic miss and evaluate the impact of this inadequate treatment on the outcome of patients treated with intracoronary ß-radiation.

Methods and Results—We analyzed 50 consecutive patients treated with ß-radiation after percutaneous coronary intervention. The prescribed dose ranged between 12 and 20 Gy at 2 mm from the source axis. By means of quantitative coronary angiography, the irradiated segment (IRS) and both edges were studied before and after intervention and at 6-month follow-up. Edges that were injured during the procedure constituted the geographic miss edges. Twenty-two edges were injured during the intervention, mainly because of procedural complications that extended the treatment beyond the margins of the IRS. Late loss was significantly higher in geographic miss edges than in IRSs and uninjured edges (0.84±0.6 versus 0.15±0.4 and 0.09±0.4 mm, respectively; P&lt;0.0001). Similarly, restenosis rate was significantly higher in the injured edges (10% within IRS, 40.9% in geographic miss edges, and 1.9% in uninjured edges; P&lt;0.001).

Conclusions—These data support the hypothesis that the combination of injury and low-dose ß-radiation induces deleterious outcome.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Geographic miss: a cause of treatment failure in radio-oncology applied to intracoronary radiation therapy (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9373/</link>
      <pubDate>2000-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: A recognized limitation of endovascular beta-radiation therapy
      is the development of new stenosis at the edges of the irradiated area.
      The combination of injury and low-dose radiation may be the precursor of
      this phenomenon. We translated the radio-oncological concept of
      "geographic miss" to define cases in which the radiation source did not
      fully cover the injured area. The aims of the study were to determine the
      incidence and causes of geographic miss and evaluate the impact of this
      inadequate treatment on the outcome of patients treated with intracoronary
      beta-radiation. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed 50 consecutive patients
      treated with beta-radiation after percutaneous coronary intervention. The
      prescribed dose ranged between 12 and 20 Gy at 2 mm from the source axis.
      By means of quantitative coronary angiography, the irradiated segment
      (IRS) and both edges were studied before and after intervention and at
      6-month follow-up. Edges that were injured during the procedure
      constituted the geographic miss edges. Twenty-two edges were injured
      during the intervention, mainly because of procedural complications that
      extended the treatment beyond the margins of the IRS. Late loss was
      significantly higher in geographic miss edges than in IRSs and uninjured
      edges (0.84+/-0.6 versus 0.15+/-0.4 and 0.09+/-0.4 mm, respectively;
      P&lt;0.0001). Similarly, restenosis rate was significantly higher in the
      injured edges (10% within IRS, 40.9% in geographic miss edges, and 1.9% in
      uninjured edges; P&lt;0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These data support the hypothesis
      that the combination of injury and low-dose beta-radiation induces
      deleterious outcome.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Positive geometric vascular remodeling is seen after catheter-based radiation followed by conventional stent implantation but not after radioactive stent implantation (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9460/</link>
      <pubDate>2000-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: Recent reports demonstrate that intracoronary radiation
      affects not only neointimal formation but also vascular remodeling.
      Radioactive stents and catheter-based techniques deliver radiation in
      different ways, suggesting that different patterns of remodeling after
      each technique may be expected. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed
      remodeling in 18 patients after conventional stent implantation, 16
      patients after low-activity radioactive stent implantation, 16 patients
      after higher activity radioactive stent implantation, and, finally, 17
      patients who underwent catheter-based radiation followed by conventional
      stent implantation. Intravascular ultrasound with 3D reconstruction was
      used after stent implantation and at the 6-month follow-up to assess
      remodeling within the stent margins and at its edges. Preprocedural
      characteristics were similar between groups. In-stent neointimal
      hyperplasia (NIH) was inhibited by high-activity radioactive stent
      implantation (NIH 9.0 mm(3)) and by catheter-based radiation followed by
      conventional stent implantation (NIH 6.9 mm(3)) compared with low-activity
      radioactive stent implantation (NIH 21.2 mm(3)) and conventional stent
      implantation (NIH 20.8 mm(3)) (P:=0.008). No difference in plaque or total
      vessel volume was seen behind the stent in the conventional, low-activity,
      or high-activity stent implantation groups. However, significant increases
      in plaque behind the stent (15%) and in total vessel volume (8%) were seen
      in the group that underwent catheter-based radiation followed by
      conventional stent implantation. All 4 groups demonstrated significant
      late lumen loss at the stent edges; however, edge restenosis was seen only
      in the group subjected to high-activity stent implantation and appeared to
      be due to an increase in plaque and, to a lesser degree, to negative
      remodeling. CONCLUSIONS: Distinct differences in the patterns of
      remodeling exist between conventional, radioactive, and catheter-based
      radiotherapy with stenting.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Three-dimensional intravascular ultrasound assessment of noninjured edges of beta-irradiated coronary segments (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9470/</link>
      <pubDate>2000-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: The "edge effect," late lumen loss at the margins of the
      treated segment, has become an important issue in the field of coronary
      brachytherapy. The aim of the present study was to assess the edge effect
      in noninjured margins adjacent to the irradiated segments after
      catheter-based intracoronary beta-irradiation. METHODS AND RESULTS:
      Fifty-three vessels were assessed by means of 3-dimensional intravascular
      ultrasound after the procedure and at 6- to 8-month follow-up. Fourteen
      vessels (placebo group) did not receive radiation (sham source), whereas
      39 vessels were irradiated. In the irradiated group, 48 edges (5 mm in
      length) were identified as noninjured, whereas 18 noninjured edges were
      selected in the placebo group. We compared the volumetric intravascular
      ultrasound measurements of the noninjured edges of the irradiated vessels
      with the fully irradiated nonstented segments (IRS, n=27) (26-mm segments
      received the prescribed 100% isodose) and the noninjured edges of the
      vessels of the placebo patients. The lumen decreased (6 mm(3)) in the
      noninjured edges of the irradiated vessels at follow-up (P:=0. 001). We
      observed a similar increase in plaque volume in all segments: noninjured
      edges of the irradiated group (19.6%), noninjured edges of the placebo
      group (21.5%), and IRS (21.0%). The total vessel volume increased in the
      IRS in the 3 groups. No edge segment was subject to repeat
      revascularization. CONCLUSIONS: The edge effect occurs in the noninjured
      margins of radiation source train in both irradiated and placebo patients.
      Thus, low-dose radiation may not play an important role in this
      phenomenon, whereas nonmeasurable device injury may be considered a
      plausible alternative explanation.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Coronary stent implantation in a septal perforator artery: case report and review of the literature (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9516/</link>
      <pubDate>2000-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Septal perforator arteries play an important role in the blood supply of the anterior interventricular septum. Their intramyocardial course makes them inaccessible for coronary bypass revascularization. Although modern catheter-based techniques might be superior to coronary bypass grafting in offering the most complete revascularization in selected patient populations, a systematic review of the literature revealed a paucity of data regarding the outcome of these patients. The present report describes coronary stent implantation in a dominant septal perforator artery and the analysis of the anatomic relationship between the stent and the intraventricular septum using a new imaging technique, catheter-based intracardiac ultrasound.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>