<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Bögels, S.M.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/10626/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>The diagnostic utility of the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders-71 (SCARED-71) (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/17472/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-05-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Objective: This study investigated the diagnostic utility of the 71-item Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED-71), as a screening tool for identifying anxiety disorders in youth aged 8–18 years.
Method: The SCARED-71 and the Anxiety Disorder Interview Schedule (ADIS) were administered to clinically referred anxious children (n = 138) and control children (n = 38) as well as their parents.
Results: Results showed that the SCARED-71 differentiated clinically anxious from control children on the total score and on all subscales. Girls generally reported higher levels of anxiety symptoms and there were also significant age effects for various anxiety subscales. Further, reliable cut-off scores were
established for the child and parent version of the SCARED-71. The parent version displayed better sensitivity and specificity, and therefore seems to be a more optimal screen for anxiety problems in children and adolescents. Finally, evidence for the predictive validity across anxiety disorders was found.
Conclusion: The SCARED-71 can be used as a screening tool to detect clinically significant anxiety problems in children and adolescents and discriminates reasonably well among specific anxiety disorders.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Assessment and validation of diagnostic interviewing skills for mental health professions (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/2695/</link>
      <pubDate>1995-11-09T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>A behavioral test was developed to assess the quality of diagnostic interviewing skills of (future) mental health professionals. Two aspects of diagnostic interviewing ability are distinguished: process skills, reflecting the interpersonal and communication skills; and content skills, referring to the information-gathering ability of the interviewer. It was found that diagnostic interviewing can be reliably measured with respect to interrater reliability. However, interviewer performance on one case proved to be a poor predictor of performance on other cases. It was concluded that a large number of cases is required to obtain reliable scores of general diagnostic interviewing ability. Validity was supported by the correlational analyses. Process skills were strongly related to patient satisfaction, whereas content skills were related to the amount of relevant information given by the patient and the accuracy of the diagnostic formulation and treatment plan.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Het verwerven van expertise in complexe domeinen: Accountancy, geneeskunde en psychiatrische diagnostiek (In Book)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/2768/</link>
      <pubDate>1993-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description></description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Ontwikkeling van een vaardigheidstoets voor het anamnestisch interview in de geestelijke gezondheidszorg (In Book)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/2773/</link>
      <pubDate>1991-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description></description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>