<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Desaulniers, G.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/10804/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Column Generation with Dynamic Duty Selection for Railway Crew Rescheduling (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/21591/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-11-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The Dutch railway network experiences about three large disruptions per day on average. In this paper, we present an algorithm to reschedule the crews when such a disruption occurs. The algorithm is based on column generation techniques combined with Lagrangian heuristics. Since the number of duties is very large in practical instances, we first define a core problem of tractable size. If some tasks remain uncovered in the solution of the core problem, we perform a neighborhood exploration to improve the solution. Computational experiments with real-life instances show that our method is capable of producing good solutions within a couple of minutes of computation time.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>A comparison of five heuristics for the multiple depot vehicle scheduling problem (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/18487/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-02-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Given a set of timetabled tasks, the multi-depot vehicle scheduling problem consists of determining least-cost schedules for vehicles assigned to several depots such that each task is accomplished exactly once by a vehicle. In this paper, we propose to compare the performance of five different heuristics for this well-known problem, namely, a truncated branch-and-cut method, a Lagrangian heuristic, a truncated column generation method, a large neighborhood search heuristic using truncated column generation for neighborhood evaluation, and a tabu search heuristic. The first three methods are adaptations of existing methods, while the last two are new in the context of this problem. Computational results on randomly generated instances show that the column generation heuristic performs the best when enough computational time is available and stability is required, while the large neighborhood search method is the best alternative when looking for good quality solutions in relatively fast computational times.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Column generation with dynamic duty selection for railway crew rescheduling (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/14423/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-12-19T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The Dutch railway network experiences about three large disruptions per day on average. In this paper, we present an algorithm to reschedule the crews when such a disruption occurs. The algorithm is based on column generation techniques combined with Lagrangian heuristics. Since the number of duties is very large in practical instances, we first define a core problem of tractable size. If some tasks remain uncovered in the solution of the core problem, we perform a neighborhood exploration to improve the solution. Computational experiments with real-life instances show that our method is capable of producing good solutions within a couple of minutes of Computation time.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Comparison of heuristic approaches for the multiple depot vehicle scheduling problem (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/8069/</link>
      <pubDate>2006-11-07T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Given a set of timetabled tasks, the multi-depot vehicle scheduling problem
is a well-known problem that consists of determining least-cost schedules
for vehicles assigned to several depots such that each task is accomplished
exactly once by a vehicle. In this paper, we propose to compare the
performance of five different heuristic approaches for this problem,
namely, a heuristic \\mip solver, a Lagrangian heuristic, a column
generation heuristic, a large neighborhood search heuristic using column
generation for neighborhood evaluation, and a tabu search heuristic. The
first three methods are adaptations of existing methods, while the last two
are novel approaches for this problem. Computational results on randomly
generated instances show that the column generation heuristic performs the
best when enough computational time is available and stability is required,
while the large neighborhood search method is the best alternative when
looking for a compromise between computational time and solution quality.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>