<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Berg, P.J. van den</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/11053/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Minor surgery in general practice: Are sterilised gloves necessary? [2] (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/32414/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-04-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description></description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Preventive care in the elderly: Studies on cardiovascular disease and hearing loss (Doctoral Thesis)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/20000/</link>
      <pubDate>1999-09-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>One of the major achievements of medicine in this century is its contribution to the
increase in life expectancy at birth. Nowadays. this is reflected in the growing Humber
of older adults. Unfortunately, part of this group will spend old age in poor health.
The consequences for older individuals, their care givers and the society at large.
raises the question whether the occurrence of disease in later life can be postponed or
even prevented.
Prevention of disease can have different aims. Firstly. it call be directed at preventing
premature death. Secondly. prevention can aim at reducing morbidity. If our
preventive programmes are successful, morbidity may be compressed to a short
period at the end of life. However, if preventive programmes also increase life
expectancy, expansion of morbidity may occur. Thirdly, preventive efforts can try to
improve functional status and maintain independence of older adults.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Cardiovascular health check in the elderly in one general practice: does it offer new information and lead to interventions? (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9171/</link>
      <pubDate>1999-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: Prevention of cardiovascular disease in the elderly is
      becoming increasingly important. GPs are in a unique position to initiate
      preventive interventions in this age group. However, it is not clear which
      strategy a GP should follow to identify patients at increased
      cardiovascular risk-case finding or screening. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to
      assess the value of a single cardiovascular health check compared with a
      normal care case finding and to investigate the diagnostic or therapeutic
      consequences of detecting new cardiovascular risk indicators. METHODS: In
      1991, 1002 persons aged 60 years and over, enlisted in one general
      practice, were invited. Of the 805 subjects who responded (80%), the
      cardiovascular risk profile was determined by a research physician. The
      proportion of newly detected cardiovascular risk indicators was the main
      outcome measure. A risk indicator was considered newly detected when it
      was not mentioned in the GP's summary of the patient record, which had
      been checked by the patient for its completeness. The patient records of
      participants with newly detected hypertension, diabetes or
      hypercholesterolaemia were systematically reviewed to detect diagnostic
      and therapeutic interventions by the GP. RESULTS: In 25.1% of the
      participants, one or more cardiovascular risk indicators were found which
      were previously unknown to the GP, including 38 (4.7%) cases of
      hypertension, 82 (10%) cases of isolated systolic hypertension, 14 (1.7%)
      cases of diabetes mellitus and 63 (7.8%) cases of hypercholesterolaemia.
      On the basis of these findings, the GP initiated therapeutic interventions
      in almost all subjects with newly detected diabetes. However, reports of
      newly detected hypertension or high cholesterol levels were usually not
      followed by an intervention. CONCLUSION: A single cardiovascular health
      check in the elderly can detect a considerable number of risk indicators
      that are unknown to a patient's GP. In most cases, however, the detection
      of hypertension or cholesterol &gt; or = 6.5 mmol/l did not lead to
      interventions by the GP. More efforts are needed to ensure that the
      beneficial effects of these interventions are not limited to participants
      in clinical trials but can be extended to patients in general practice.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>