<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Lopes, C.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/11156/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Guidelines for processing and reporting of prostatic needle biopsies (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/8372/</link>
      <pubDate>2003-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The reported detection rate of prostate cancer, lesions suspicious for
      cancer, and prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) in needle biopsies
      is highly variable. In part, technical factors, including the quality of
      the biopsies, the tissue processing, and histopathological reporting, may
      account for these differences. It has been thought that standardisation of
      tissue processing might reduce the observed variations in detection rate.
      Consensus among the members of the pathology committee of the European
      Randomised study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) concerning the
      optimal methodology of tissue embedding resulting in guidelines for
      prostatic needle biopsy processing was reached. The adoption of an
      unequivocal and uniform way of reporting lesions encountered in prostatic
      needle biopsies is considered helpful for decision taking by the
      clinician. The definition of parameters for quality control of prostatic
      needle biopsy diagnostics will further facilitate clinical epidemiological
      multicentre studies of prostate cancer.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>