<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Nispen tot Pannerden, F.K.M. van</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/11206/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Budgeting and Finance: Budget Watcher’s Blues [Introduction to the Section on Budgeting and Finance] (In Book)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/38150/</link>
      <pubDate>2012-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description></description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Budgeting and Finance (In Book)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/33100/</link>
      <pubDate>2012-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The Call for a Budgetary Theory: The appeal of Valdimer Key for a budgetary theory marks the interest in public budgeting in modern history. He clearly referred to a normative theory, raising the question: ‘on what basis shall it be decided to allocate X dollars to activity A instead of activity B?’ [Key, in Hyde &amp; Shafritz 1978, p. 20]. A couple of efforts to develop such a theory failed before Aaron Wildavsky took over the relay baton, issuing the first edition of his seminal The Politics of the Budgetary Process that changed the budgetary landscape almost completely2. He argued that the allocation of scarce resources is not a matter of arithmetics or calculation, but a matter of power. On top of that he claimed that of incrementalism offered both the best description of and prescription to the budget process, introducing now common words as the ‘base’ and ‘fair share’ in the vocabulary of budget watchers [Wildavsky 1964]3. Soon, incrementalism became the dominant theory of public budgeting in America and, strange enough, also in Europe where the power of the purse is with the executive rather than the legislative branch of government. Moreover, empirical support was at least mixed, if not to say weak [LeLoup 1978; Rubin 1988].</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>European Integration by Stealth: Budgetary Control in the Eurozone, (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/33098/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-12-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Introduction: The birth of the EMU featured almost unprecedented transfer of sovereignty from the European member states to a newly created European institution. Ever since, the monetary policy has been the sole responsibility of the ECB at least for the countries in the Eurozone. The budgetary policy though still belongs to the domain of the European member states. However, they are not completely free to pursue there own budgetary policy as this is subject of economic governance or either coordination by the SGP. Sound public finances are considered to be a necessary, though not sufficient condition for price stability.
The financial crisis and notably the situation in Greece brought a number of new instruments. In addition to a framework for crisis management, the Task Force on Strengthening Economic Governance called for broader and deeper policy coordination through the introduction of a so-called European Semester, allowing the European institutions to assess the draft budget and to come up with recommendations before it is submitted to national parliaments. In this paper we will critically assess the various proposals that have been done to reinforce budgetary coordination, addressing the question what would make the European member states comply under the new rules of the game where they did not under the old ones.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Budgetary Coordination in the Eurozone: The Reform of the Stability and Growth Pact (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/33099/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-08-25T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Introduction: The birth of the EMU featured almost unprecedented transfer of sovereignty from the European member states to a newly created European institution. Ever since, the monetary policy has been the sole responsibility of the ECB at least for the countries in the Eurozone. The budgetary policy though still belongs to the domain of the European member states. However, they are not completely free to pursue there own budgetary policy as this is subject of economic governance or either coordination by the SGP. Sound public finances are considered to be a necessary, though not sufficient condition for price stability.
The financial crisis and notably the situation in Greece brought a number of new instruments. In addition to a framework for crisis management, the Task Force on Strengthening Economic Governance called for broader and deeper policy coordination through the introduction of a so-called European Semester, allowing the European institutions to assess the draft budget and to come up with recommendations before it is submitted to national parliaments. In this paper we will critically assess the various proposals that have been done to reinforce budgetary coordination, addressing the question what would make the European member states comply under the new rules of the game where they did not under the old ones.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Managing Public Performance Through Budgetary Incentives: Appropriate Regardless the Consequences? (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/38152/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-08-25T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Abstract
The current budgetary crises can be seen as a test case for New Public Management (NPM) reforms that have been adopted worldwide during the last two decades. One of these tools, performance based budgeting (PBB), is the subject of this paper. Although the roots of Performance Based Budgeting can be traced back as far as the early 20thcentury, PBB gained worldwide popularity in the 1990s and early 2000s as part of the NPM agenda. NPM introduced a set of recipes that were meant to transform the public sector towards more result orientation and efficiency. It is not clear yet what the post NPM era will look like exactly, but it looks like NPM’s heyday is well behind us. In the meantime, many traces of these reforms still dominate today’s public sector landscape.
It can easily be argued that PBB has become and remained so popular more because of the promises that it holds than the results that can empirically be attributed to its introduction. Regarding PBB, Allen Schick once noted that: governments that don’t manage for results will not budget for results *Schick 2003+. Expanding on Schick’s observation, the very type of result orientation that PBB was intended to achieve may turn out to be its main unarticulated premise. In other words, did PBB indeed modify public organizations and their steering relationships? Or did it merely codify existing behavior in those cases that report success?
This paper presents a theoretical framework and method to assess this question. Lending from neo-institutional, more precisely principal-agent theory, alternative explanations for the use of performance information will be tested in international cases that share successful PBB implementation. The incentives PBB creates strongly rely on the logic of consequence. The alternative explanations sought follow the logic of appropriateness by focusing on the concepts such as of path dependency, cultural appropriateness and cognitive frames.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Policy Instruments (In Book)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/33101/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The study of policy instruments dates from the early seventies, though there has been written a lot before especially in economics about government intervention in relation to market imperfections. A policy instrument refers the means of government intervention in markets or, in broader perspective, society in order to accomplish goals or to solve problems. The behavioral assumption underlying a policy instrument is that it attempts to get people do things that they might not otherwise have done. In the last fifty years we featured a transformation not just in the scope and scale of the role of the government, but also in the proliferation of tools that it has to its disposal for public action. In retrospect a distinction can made between three partly overlapping stadiums in the study of policy instruments.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Brede heroverweging: paasei of windei? (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/22340/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-06-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Ruim twee maanden geleden,
vlak voor Pasen, hebben de
ambtelijke werkgroepen –
gedwongen door de val van
het kabinet en daarop volgende verkiezingen
– hun ei gelegd. Zij hadden tot
taak om varianten te ontwikkelen voor het
huidig beleid, waarvan één die zou leiden
tot een vermindering van de uitgaven
met 20% ten opzichte van de lopende
begroting. In totaal zou op die wijze 35
miljard moeten worden opgebracht, een
vingerwijzing naar de afspraken die zijn
gemaakt over het EMU -saldo.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Haastige spoed is zelden goed (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/18504/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-09-11T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description></description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>The Quest for Efficiency in the Public Sector. Towards a Refined Action Model (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/17835/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-09-02T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Abstract
The national Courts of Audit are going through a series of developments [Pollitt &amp; Bouckaert 2004: 73-74]. Traditionally their mission is to check the legality of public expenditures. However, with a legality of almost 100 percent, the Dutch Court of Audit shifted its attention to the efficiency of government spending. The pursuit of efficiency in the public sector is at the heart, too, of the VBTB that can be seen as the Dutch interpretation of the international trend into the direction of performance informed budgeting1. Academically tributary to the body of knowledge of policy analysis and evaluation, the VBTB is making a clear cut distinction between the drafting of the budget and accounting for the budget. The latter is the domain of the Court of Audit, scrutinizing the annual reports of ministries, basically raising three questions:
1.Have we achieved what we intended to achieve?
2.Have we done what we should have done?
3.Has it cost what we expected it would cost?
More precisely, the Court of Audit is looking at the availability as well as the quality of the information provided by government. The findings are submitted to parliament on the third Wednesday of May. In this paper we focus on the interaction between the Court of Audit and the standing committee on Public Expenditures in parliament in charge of the VBTB. In addition, attention will be paid to the utilization of the findings of the Court of Audit in next year’s budget.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Performance Informed Budgeting in Europe: The Ends Justify the Means, Don’t They? (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/17644/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The last few decades a revival of the performance budgeting generating a complete performance industry. Initiated by the Anglo-Saxon countries, notably New Zealand, the performance movement is widespread today. In this paper we focus on the efforts of the three European countries - Finland, the
Netherlands and Spain - to link inputs to outputs and/or the results by looking at three questions:
" What is the rationale for budgetary reform?
" What is the orientation of budgetary reform: outputs or results?
" Is budgetary reform successful?
Fiscal stress is a key driver in all cases, but not the only reason for budgetary reform. Other factors such as the Maastricht criteria for qualification and participation in the EMU have served as a trigger for budgetary reform. The approach differs from country to country, but they are all focused on the
performance informed budgeting. Besides, the latest developments point in the direction of a more down to earth attitude to the expectations of budgetary reform. The success of budgetary reform hinges on the quality of performance information that is assumed a necessary but not sufficient
condition for the use of performance information. All complain  about the quality of performance information. Moreover, they all struggle with the link of the inputs to the outputs or results that makes us conclude, addressing the question that we raised in the subtitle of our paper, that the ends do not justify - neither moral nor empirical - the means as well as resources.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Heroverweging: Een beleidsanalytische manier van bezuinigen (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/22414/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-10-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description></description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Building Bridges Across Frames? A Meta-Evaluation of Dutch Integration Policy (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/17834/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-08-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The integration of immigrants is an intractable policy controversy in Dutch politics: the Blok Committee was established by Parliament to offer a resolution. However, its evaluation study ‘ Building Bridges’, itself became controversial. This paper asks: Why did the policy evaluation of the Blok Committee become so fiercely contested? We argue that the debate on immigrant integration can be characterized by frame-conflict: there were fundamental differences in how immigrant integration was defined and normatively interpreted by actors. The resolution of such ill-structured problems requires the critical articulation of multiple and conflicting frames. In situations of intractable policy controversies, policy evaluation should reach beyond mere technical and contextual levels to include systemic and ideological discourse. Policy evaluation can thereby focus more on utilization and contribute to the resolution of intractable policy controversies by building bridges among conflicting frames.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Beleidsevaluatie: gelijk hebben # gelijk krijgen (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/13454/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-05-30T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Al enige decennia is er een internationale trend waarneembaar in de richting van een steeds grotere prestatieoriëntatie als het gaat om overheidshandelen. Dit beperkt zich niet alleen tot het beleidsvormende deel van het overheidshandelen, maar heeft evenzeer betrekking op de wijze waarop verantwoording wordt afgelegd. Beleidsonderzoek ter facilitering van beleidsvormingsprocessen (beleidsevaluatie ex ante) heeft dan ook een enorme vlucht genomen. De focus op beleidsprestaties lijkt een onbedoeld neveneffect te hebben in die zin dat analyses ten behoeve van beleid steeds partiëler worden (de focus op beoogde effecten). Belangengroepen, stakeholders zien hun belangen minder goed vertegenwoordigd en komen met eigen beleidsonderzoeken. De institutionalisering van belangen die zich in de samenleving heeft voorgedaan, heeft zich daardoor onder andere vertaald in een proliferatie van beleidsonderzoek. Beleidsvoerders laten zich bijstaan door een interne of externe onderzoekers. Het streven is daarbij niet langer gericht op een integrale afweging van alle belangen, maar slechts op de onderbouwing van een al vooringenomen standpunt, dan wel de ondermijning van het standpunt van de tegenstanders in de politieke arena. Zij zijn tegelijkertijd tot elkaar veroordeeld, hetgeen noopt tot compromissen en ‘trade-offs’, waarbij de uitslag niet zozeer wordt bepaald door de macht van het argument, als wel door de macht van de sterkste. Het doel heiligt de middelen: ‘gelijk hebben’ is ondergeschikt aan ‘gelijk krijgen’. Misschien wordt het tijd voor een terugkeer van de integrale beleidsevaluatie.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>The Concept of Subsidiarity in a European Context: The End of National Sovereignty? (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/11568/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The concept of subsidiarity is introduced in the context of the European Union by the Maastricht Treaty [1991]. That treaty laid the foundations for the Europe of the future. However, the notion is much older as it is deeply rooted in the Christian-Democratic ideology, notably Roman Catholic religion. It has been applied to the various denominations in The Netherlands, which were institutionalized for years in pillars. The elites at the top of these pillars pursued a politics of accommodation that explains, at least partly, the relative stable political situation.
The consequences were important since The Netherlands is a country in which public and private organizations contribute to the realization of the welfare state. Besides, it is also a country in which local government takes an important share in the implementation of public tasks. Ideologically subsidiarity, sovereignty in the private domain and functionally and territorial decentralization found each other. The result was a relatively small central government, a strong decentralized government and strong social organizations.
The question may be raised what happened with the principle of subsidiarity since the outcome in the Netherlands is rather centralization than decentralization. In addition, one may question what can be learned from the Dutch experience for the process of European integration. In this paper we address the question to what extent the developments in The Netherlands have their parallel in the European context. We conclude that concepts like subsidiarity are a device for a strong society with a relatively weak center and decentralized governments.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>The Art and Craft of Budgeting: Fiscal Policy in the Eurozone (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/11570/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>In the past twenty-five years we have seen a growing body of literature on the determinants of fiscal policy as measured by analyzing cross-national data on budgetary deficits and public debts. The discussion is largely shaped by Jürgen von Hagen’s work on the impact of both political and economic institutions. In this paper we will take a slightly different angle, looking at cultural variables. Taking Aaron Wildavsky’s cultural theory of budgeting as point of departure, we assume that the budgetary strategy of the countries in the eurozone is related to their political culture or regime. Using empirical data provided by the European Union, we conclude that empirical support for the cultural theory of budgeting is concentrated at the extremes of the political spectrum. However, empirical support is much stronger if we differentiate to the economic situation. The outcome underscores, once again, that it is hard to maintain an anti-cyclical policy during an upswing of the economy.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Bewapen de Kamer voor verantwoording (Miscellaneous)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/11571/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Geef de Tweede Kamer een eigen onderzoeksbureau en versterk de positie van de
vaste kamercommissie voor de Rijksuitgaven. Er zijn drastischere maatregelen
nodig dan de voorstellen die minister Wouter Bos van Financiën vorige week op
tafel heeft gelegd ter verbetering van de dag van de verantwoording.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>VBTB-proof? Het veiligheidsprogramma nader beschouwd (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/11554/</link>
      <pubDate>2006-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Al vele jaren en op vele manieren wordt getracht de overheidsprestaties te verbeteren. Binnen de
openbare financiën is de transformatie van een input- naar een outputbegroting een van de meest
ingrijpende wijzigingen op dit vlak. In de voetsporen van andere OECD-landen startte de Nederlandse
regering enkele jaren geleden het project ‘Van Beleidsbegroting tot Beleidsverantwoording’ (VBTB),
dat moet leiden tot een toegankelijker en beleidsgerichter begroting en jaarverslag. Vooral ten
aanzien van prestatiegegevens liggen de resultaten achter op de ambities. Binnen het beleidsdomein
lijkt dit beter te gaan, getuige bijvoorbeeld de opzet van beleidsprogramma’s, die vaak ingekleed zijn
met een uitgebreid rapportagestramien voor het volgen van de voortgang van het beleid. In dit artikel
wordt de informatiewaarde van deze prestatiegegevens nader verkend. Daartoe wordt geanalyseerd
in hoeverre een beleidsprogramma, te weten het Veiligheidsprogramma, VBTB-proof is. De resultaten
daarvan bieden tevens handvatten voor een nadere beoordeling van de (on)mogelijkheden van een
resultaatgerichte begroting.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Performance Budgeting in the Netherlands: Beyond Arithmetic (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/11573/</link>
      <pubDate>2006-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Performance-based budgeting seems to be a promising tool for
improving the management and accountability of public finances.
However, its application causes many difficulties. This article briefly reviews international experience with performance-based budgeting and explores its application in the Netherlands since the late 1990s, including a case study of the Safety Programme. The focus is on transparency and the quality of the performance information. Compared to the former input budget,  performance-based budgeting constitutes a major step forward. Given the many difficulties in implementing performance budgeting, it is recommendable, though, to critically revise its scope and shape.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Introduction tot the Section on Budgeting and Finance (In Book)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/17836/</link>
      <pubDate>2003-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description></description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Living Apart Together in Europe (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/1579/</link>
      <pubDate>2002-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>A couple of years ago Joschka Fischer, the German minister of Foreign Affairs
articulated his European dream, calling for a specification of the 'Finalität', that is the
ultimate goal of the process of European integration. It came at a moment that Europe is
challenged by two conflicting developments - globalization and localization - labeled by
Tom Courchene as 'glocalization' [Watts 1994]. The outcome of the process of
European integration is still unclear, but will be in line with the striking characterization of
Alexis de Tocqueville of the original idea of the American federation.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>The Market for Civil Servants: Public Administration in The Netherlands (In Book)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/775/</link>
      <pubDate>2000-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The Dutch civil service has undergone profound changes over the last two decades. Although certainly not unique in this respect reform has left its mark on the size, the organization and the preferred mode of operation of the civil service. In this contribution we will concentrate on the aspects related to the labour market for civil servants. We intend to explore the relation between the changes in demand for civil servants and the changes in how (future) civil servants are educated and trained for a job in  government. Using the 'market' metaphor we will look at the demand for and the supply of civil servants working at the central level of government.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>The Quest for a Leaner, Not a Meaner Government (In Proceedings)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/773/</link>
      <pubDate>1999-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>In 1993, the Clinton administration launched the National Performance Review [NPR], a large-scale effort to create a more entrepreneurial government that ?works better and costs less?. The NPR relied heavily on the input and effort of federal civil servants. Although the rationale for the reduction was formulated in terms of performance improvement, it was as much driven by the goal of cost cutting. A similar effort took place in The Netherlands with the ?Grote Efficiency Operatie? [Operation Efficiency]. During the 1980?s, the Dutch government established six so-called ?major operations? to improve its performance and reduce costs. The history, targets, procedure and organization as well as results of both countries? efforts are analyzed. Comparison of the NPR and the GEO entails certain risks but yields insights that contribute to an understanding of efforts at public sector reform which transcends particular national contexts. Both operations began as efforts to improve efficiency but quickly became focused on personnel reduction.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Public Administration Programmes in The Netherlands (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/774/</link>
      <pubDate>1999-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Public administration in The Netherlands is generally approached as a multi-disciplinary field of inquiry, especially in the social sciences. Some schools attempt a more integrating approach preserving the integrity of Public Administration as an academic discipline. Its focus is on: 
1. mainstream public administration (theories, models etc. on policy- and decision making, organization, human resource management) and on insights from other disciplines that also have an interest in the study of government such as political science, sociology, law and economics; 
2. the structure and functioning of Dutch government at large. Next to serving the regular student body (full-time and day-time students) special evening programs and special streams have been developed. 
The interest in European administration, particularly the comparative component (i.e. cross-national analysis of administrative systems in the member states) and the implementation and enforcement of European policies at the grass-roots level should attract much more attention.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>