<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Kreuger, F.A.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/11280/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Positive diagnostic values and histological detection ratios from the Rotterdam cervical cancer screening programme (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/8873/</link>
      <pubDate>1998-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: In organized screening programmes for cervical cancer,
          pre-cancerous lesions are detected by cervical smears. However, during
          follow-up after a positive smear these pre-cancerous lesions are not
          always found. The purpose of the study is to analyse positive diagnostic
          values of smears of at least mild dysplasia, made under the organized
          screening programmes in the Rotterdam area (1979-1991), and detection
          ratios of histologically confirmed CIN &gt; or =3, among women participating
          in these screening programmes. METHODS: Positive diagnostic values and
          histological detection ratios, by age and history of previous smears,
          recorded during the national screening programme (1989-1991), were
          compared with those of the experimental cervical cancer screening project
          (1976-1984). RESULTS: The positive diagnostic value of a smear with at
          least severe dysplasia (histologically confirmed CIN &gt; or =3) remains
          approximately 78%. For smears with mild and moderate dysplasia only lower
          limits of the diagnostic value could be determined. This was 9% for a
          smear with mild dysplasia obtained during the national screening programme
          and 25% and 35% for smears with moderate dysplasia taken during the
          experimental and national screening programmes respectively. Histological
          detection ratios for CIN &gt; or =3 in the three rounds of the experimental
          screening project were 4.7, 2.9 and 1.9. In the first round of the
          national screening programme the ratio was 4.7, and about three times
          higher in younger compared to older women. CONCLUSION: Immediate referral
          for colposcopy after a smear showing moderate dysplasia seems
          questionable. Whether the increased detection ratio among young women
          indicates a rise in the risk of cervical cancer is unclear.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>