<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Karsch, K.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/11429/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>ACE inhibition and endothelial function: Main findings of PERFECT, a sub-study of the EUROPA trial (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/36429/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-08-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Background: ACE inhibition results in secondary prevention of coronary artery disease (CAD) through different mechanisms including improvement of endothelial dysfunction. The Perindopril-Function of the Endothelium in Coronary artery disease Trial (PERFECT) evaluated whether long-term administration of perindopril improves endothelial dysfunction. Methods: PERFECT is a 3-year double blind randomised placebo controlled trial to determine the effect of perindopril 8 mg once daily on brachial artery endothelial function in patients with stable CAD without clinical heart failure. Endothelial function in response to ischaemia was assessed using ultrasound. Primary endpoint was difference in flow-mediated vasodilatation (FMD) assessed at 36 months. Results: In 20 centers, 333 patients randomly received perindopril or matching placebo. Ischemia-induced FMD was 2.7% (SD 2.6). In the perindopril group FMD went from 2.6% at baseline to 3.3% at 36 months and in the placebo group from 2.8 to 3.0%. Change in FMD after 36 month treatment was 0.55% (95% confidence interval -0.36, 1.47; p=0.23) higher in perindopril than in placebo group. The rate of change in FMD per 6 months was 0.14% (SE 0.05, p=0.02) in perindopril and 0.02% (SE 0.05, p=0.74) in placebo group (0.12% difference in rate of change p=0.07). Conclusion: Perindopril resulted in a modest, albeit not statistically significant, improvement in FMD. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Patients with acute coronary syndromes without persistent ST elevation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention benefit most from early intervention with protection by a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blocker. (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/13008/</link>
      <pubDate>2002-02-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: Many patients with acute coronary syndromes are offered percutaneous coronary intervention. However, the appropriate indications for, and optimal timing of, such procedures are uncertain. We analysed timing of intervention and associated events (death and myocardial infarction) in the PURSUIT trial in which 9461 patients received a platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor, eptifibatide, or placebo for 72 h. Other treatment was left to the investigators. 2430 patients underwent percutaneous coronary intervention within 30 days. Four groups were distinguished, who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention on day 1; on days 2 or 3; at 4 to 7 days; or between 8 until 30 days, for eptifibatide- and placebo-treated patients. RESULTS: The four groups treated with placebo demonstrated total 30-day events of 15.9% for day 1 percutaneous coronary intervention, 17.7%, 15.0% and 18.2%, respectively, for successive intervals of later intervention. Later intervention was associated with more pre-procedural events (2.2% to 13.7%, P=0.001) which was balanced by a decrease in procedure-related events (12.1 to 3.1%, P=0.001), while the overall 30-day event rates were similar. Eptifibatide-treated patients with percutaneous coronary intervention on day 1 had the lowest rate of 30-day events (9.2%, P&lt;0.05 vs other groups). In this group, pre-procedural risk was only 0.3%, while percutaneous coronary intervention on eptifibatide treatment was associated with low procedural risk (7.2%). The total 30-day event rate for later percutaneous coronary intervention in patients receiving eptifibatide was 14.0 on days 2 and 3, 15.0% for days 4 to 7 and 17.4% for days 7 to 30, respectively. CONCLUSION: Patients treated with a platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blocker, and early percutaneous coronary intervention (within 24 h) had the lowest event rate in this post hoc analysis. Thus 'watchful waiting' may not be the optimal strategy. Rather an early invasive strategy with percutaneous coronary intervention under protection of a platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blocker should be considered in selected patients. Randomized trials are warranted to verify this issue.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Clinical and therapeutic profile of patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes who do not have significant coronary artery disease.The Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa in Unstable Angina: Receptor Suppression Using Integrilin Therapy (PURSUIT) Trial Investigators (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9449/</link>
      <pubDate>2000-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: A proportion of patients who present with suspected acute
      coronary syndrome (ACS) are found to have insignificant coronary artery
      disease (CAD) during coronary angiography, but these patients have not
      been well characterized. METHODS AND RESULTS: Of the 5767 patients with
      non-ST-segment elevation ACS who were enrolled in the Platelet
      Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa in Unstable Angina: Receptor Suppression Using
      Integrilin (Eptifibatide) Therapy (PURSUIT) trial and who underwent
      in-hospital angiography, 88% had significant CAD (any stenosis &gt;50%), 6%
      had mild CAD (any stenosis &gt;0% to &lt;/=50%), and 6% had no CAD (no stenosis
      identified). The frequency of death or nonfatal myocardial infarction at
      30 days was reduced with eptifibatide treatment in patients with
      significant CAD (18.3% versus 15.6% for placebo, P=0.006) but not in those
      with mild CAD (6.6% versus 5.4%, P=0.62) and with no CAD (3.0% versus 1.
      2%, P=0.28). We identified independent baseline predictors of
      insignificant CAD (mild or no CAD) and used them to develop a simple
      predictive nomogram of the probability of insignificant CAD for use at
      hospital presentation. This nomogram was validated in a separate
      population of patients with non-ST-segment elevation ACS. CONCLUSIONS:
      Patients with suspected ACS found to have insignificant CAD have a low
      risk of adverse outcomes, do not appear to benefit from treatment with
      eptifibatide, and can be predicted with a simple nomogram drawn from
      baseline characteristics. Because patients with significant CAD appear to
      have an enhanced benefit from eptifibatide treatment, the predictive
      nomogram developed can be used to determine indications for glycoprotein
      IIb/IIIa blockade.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Clinical Significance of Thrombocytopenia During a Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/5656/</link>
      <pubDate>1999-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: The significance of thrombocytopenia in patients experiencing an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) has not been examined systematically. We evaluated this condition in a large non-ST-elevation ACS clinical trial, with particular interest paid to its correlation with clinical outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients presenting without persistent ST elevation during an ACS were randomized to receive a double-blind infusion of the platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitor eptifibatide or placebo in addition to other standard therapies including heparin and aspirin. The primary end point was death/nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) at 30 days, whereas bleeding and stroke were the main safety outcomes. Thrombocytopenia (nadir platelet count &lt;100x10(9)/L or &lt;50% of baseline) occurred in 7.0% of enrolled patients. The time to onset was a median of 4 days in both treatment arms. Patients with thrombocytopenia were older, weighed less, were more likely nonwhite, and had more cardiac risk factors. These patients experienced significantly more bleeding events: they were more than twice as likely to experience moderate/severe bleeding after adjustment for confounders. Univariably, ischemic events (stroke, MI, and death) occurred significantly (P&lt;0.001) more frequently in patients with thrombocytopenia; multivariable regression modeling preserved this association with death/nonfatal MI at 30 days. Neither the use of heparin or eptifibatide was found to independently increase thrombocytopenic risk. CONCLUSIONS: Although causality between thrombocytopenia and adverse clinical events could not be established definitively, thrombocytopenia was highly correlated with both bleeding and ischemic events, and the presence of this condition identified a more-at-risk patient population.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>