<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Lie, K.I.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/1143/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Continuously improving the practice of cardiology (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/5722/</link>
      <pubDate>2004-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Guidelines for the management of patients with
cardiovascular disease are designed to assist
cardiologists and other physicans in their practice.
Surveys are conducted to assess whether guidelines
are followed in practice. The results of surveys on
acute coronary syndromes, coronary revascularisation,
secondary prevention, valvular heart disease
and heart failure are presented. Comparing surveys
conducted between 1995 and 2002, a gradual improvement
in use ofsecondary preventive therapy
is observed. Nevertheless, important deviations
from established guidelines are noted, with a
significant variation among different hospitals in
the Netherlands and in other European countries.
Measures for fiuther improvement of clinical
practice indude more rapid treatment of patients
with evolving myocardial infarction, more frequent
use of clopidogrel and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa
receptor blockers in patients with acute coronary
syndromes, more frequent use of 5-blockers in
patients with heart failure and more intense
measures to encourage patients to stop smoking.
Targets for the proportion ofpatients who might
receive specific therapies are presented.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Variability in treatment advice for elderly patients with aortic stenosis: a nationwide survey in the Netherlands (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/12173/</link>
      <pubDate>2001-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>OBJECTIVETo determine how the decisions of Dutch cardiologists on surgical treatment for aortic stenosis were influenced by the patient's age, cardiac signs and symptoms, and comorbidity; and to identify groups of cardiologists whose responses to these clinical characteristics were similar.
DESIGNA questionnaire was produced asking cardiologists to indicate on a six point scale whether they would advise cardiac surgery for each of 32 case vignettes describing 10 clinical characteristics.
SETTINGNationwide postal survey among all 530 cardiologists in the Netherlands.
RESULTS52% of the cardiologists responded. There was wide variability in the cardiologists' advice for the individual case vignettes. Six groups of cardiologists explained 60% of the variance. The age of the patient was most important for 41% of the cardiologists; among these, 50% had a high and 50% a low inclination to advise surgery. A further 24% were influenced equally by the patient's age and by the severity of the aortic stenosis and its effect on left ventricular function; among these, 62% had a high and 38% a low inclination to advise surgery. Finally, 23% of the cardiologists were mainly influenced by the left ventricular function and 12% by the aortic valve area. The presence of comorbidity always played a minor role.
CONCLUSIONSThere were systematic differences among groups of cardiologists in their inclination to advise aortic valve replacement for elderly patients, as well as in the way their advice was influenced by the patients' characteristics. These results indicate the need for prospective studies to identify the best treatment for elderly patients according to their clinical profile.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Clinical events following excimer laser angioplasty or balloon angioplasty for complex coronary lesions: subanalysis of a randomised trial (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/8303/</link>
      <pubDate>1998-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>OBJECTIVES: To compare clinical outcome in patients with complex coronary
      lesions treated with either excimer laser coronary angioplasty (ELCA) or
      balloon angioplasty. PATIENTS AND DESIGN: 308 patients with stable angina
      and a coronary lesion of more than 10 mm in length were randomised to ELCA
      (151 patients, 158 lesions) or balloon angioplasty (157 patients, 167
      lesions). The primary clinical end points were death, myocardial
      infarction, coronary bypass surgery, or repeated coronary angioplasty of
      the randomised segment during six months of follow up. Subanalysis was
      performed to identify a subgroup of patients with a beneficial clinical
      outcome following ELCA or balloon angioplasty. SETTING: Two university
      hospitals and one general hospital. RESULTS: There were no deaths.
      Myocardial infarction, coronary bypass surgery, and repeated angioplasty
      occurred in 4.6, 10.6, and 21.2%, respectively, of patients treated with
      ELCA compared with 5.7, 10.8, and 18.5%, respectively, of those treated
      with balloon angioplasty. ELCA did not yield a favourable clinical outcome
      in subgroups of patients with long (more than 20 mm) coronary lesions,
      calcified lesions, small diseased vessels (&lt; or = 2.5 mm reference
      diameter), or total coronary occlusions. There was a worse clinical
      outcome in patients with tandem lesions treated with ELCA compared with
      balloon angioplasty (9/18 v 3/26 lesions; p = 0.01); while a trend towards
      an unfavourable clinical outcome was found in patients with vessels with a
      reference diameter of more than 2.5 mm (23/66 v 13/63 lesions, p = 0.07)
      and left circumflex coronary lesions (12/41 v 6/42 lesions, p = 0.08).
      CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate a worse clinical outcome in patients
      with lesions of more than 10 mm treated with ELCA compared with balloon
      angioplasty who have tandem coronary lesions and in those with vessels
      with a reference diameter of more than 2.5 mm and left circumflex coronary
      lesions.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>The "Ermonville" classification of observations at coronary angioscopy - evaluation of intra- and inter-observer agreement (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/4607/</link>
      <pubDate>1994-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>A European coronary angioscopy working group has been established to create and evaluate a classification system for angioscopic observation. The 'Ermenonville' classification features items, graded in 3-5 categories, such as lumen diameter, shape of narrowing, colours of surface, atheroma, dissection, thrombus, etc. Inter- and intra-observer agreement on the interpretation of angioscopic images, using this classification system, was studied within the working group. Kappa values for chance-corrected intra-observer agreement of the diagnostic items were 0.51-0.67. The mean kappa values for inter-observer agreement were very low at 0.13-0.29. The important items, such as red thrombus and dissection were studied after recoding as either present or absent. These items proved to have a good intra-observer agreement, and an acceptable inter-observer agreement after recoding. Other angioscopic diagnoses should be made with caution. Multicentre angioscopy studies should make use of an angioscopy core laboratory. A set of definitions for coronary angioscopy is proposed, and this working group will re-evaluate observer agreements using these definitions.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Angioscopic versus angiographic detection of intimal dissection and intracoronary thrombus (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/4612/</link>
      <pubDate>1994-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>OBJECTIVES: This study was undertaken to compare coronary angioscopy with angiography for the detection of intimal dissection and intracoronary thrombus. BACKGROUND. It has been demonstrated previously that coronary angioscopy provides more intravascular detail than cineangiography. Both imaging methods have to be compared directly to assess the additional diagnostic value of angioscopy. METHODS. The angiograms and videotapes of 52 patients who had undergone angioscopy were reviewed independently by two observers unaware of other findings. Classic angiographic definitions were used for dissection and thrombus. Angioscopic dissection was defined as visible cracks or fissures on the lumen surface or mobile protruding structures that are contiguous with the vessel wall. Angioscopic thrombus was defined as a red, white or mixed red and white intraluminal mass. RESULTS. Angiography and angioscopy were in agreement in 40.4% of cases in the absence of thrombus and in 11.5% in the presence of thrombus. No fewer than 25 (48.1%) angioscopically observed thrombi remained undetected at angiography. With angioscopy as the standard, although the specificity of angiography for thrombus was 100%, sensitivity was very low at 19%. Angioscopic dissection was present in 40 patients (76.9%) versus angiographic dissection in 15 patients (28.8%). With regard to dissection, there was no correlation between the two imaging methods (r phi = 0.15, p = 0.29). CONCLUSIONS. Coronary angiography underestimates the presence of intracoronary thrombus. Angioscopy and angiography are complementary techniques for detecting and grading intimal dissections.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>