<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Vermaas, A.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/11725/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Agency, Managed Care and Financial-Risk Sharing in General Medical Practice (Doctoral Thesis)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/7978/</link>
      <pubDate>2006-09-14T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Which techniques can and do third-party agents apply within their relationships with 
general practitioners in order to reduce the agency problems within the patient-physician 
relationship? 

We gave an overview of techniques that are used by third parties rather commonly – that 
is to say, in some health-care systems. In health care (the use of) such a set of techniques 
is usually designated as ‘managed care’. We argued that the managed-care techniques fit 
in the triptych of agency theory remarkably well. The three successive phases that comprise 
this triptych (selecting, controlling and monitoring the agent) form an iterative process, 
which we labelled the managed-care cycle. Hence from the perspective of agency 
theory, managed care can be viewed as (the cyclical use of) a set of techniques by which 
the third-party agent may attempt to influence the behaviour of the agent in a way that is 
beneficial to the patient.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>