<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Timmermans, M.A.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/12073/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Long-term outcome of bipolar depressed patients receiving lamotrigine as add-on to lithium with the possibility of the addition of paroxetine in nonresponders: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial with a novel design (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/22909/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-02-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Objective: In two previous manuscripts, we described the efficacy of lamotrigine versus placebo as add-on to lithium (followed by the addition of paroxetine in nonresponders) in the short-term treatment of bipolar depression. In this paper we describe the long-term (68weeks) outcome of that study. Methods: A total of 124 bipolar depressed patients receiving lithium were randomized to addition of lamotrigine or placebo. After eight weeks, paroxetine was added to nonresponders for another eight weeks. Responders continued medication and were followed for up to 68weeks or until a relapse or recurrence of a depressive or manic episode. Results: After eight weeks, the addition of lamotrigine to lithium was significantly more efficacious than addition of placebo, while after addition of paroxetine in nonresponders both groups further improved with no significant difference between groups at week 16. During follow-up the efficacy of lamotrigine was maintained: time to relapse or recurrence was longer for the lamotrigine group [median time 10.0months (confidence interval: 1.1-18.8)] versus the placebo group [3.5months (confidence interval: 0.7-7.0)]. Conclusion: In patients with bipolar depression, despite continued use of lithium, addition of lamotrigine revealed a continued benefit compared to placebo throughout the entire study.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Efficacy and safety of two treatment algorithms in bipolar depression consisting of a combination of lithium, lamotrigine or placebo and paroxetine (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/27453/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-09-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Objective: In a previous paper, we reported about the efficacy of the addition of lamotrigine to lithium in patients with bipolar depression. In the second phase of this study paroxetine was added to ongoing treatment in non-responders. Method: Bipolar depressed patients (n = 124) treated with lithium were randomized to addition of lamotrigine or placebo. In non-responders after 8 weeks, paroxetine 20 mg was added for another 8 weeks to ongoing treatment. Results: After 8 weeks the improvement in patients treated with lamotrigine vs. patients treated with placebo was significant. After addition of paroxetine this difference disappeared as a result of greater further improvement in the non-responders to placebo. Conclusion: Addition of lamotrigine to lithium was found effective in bipolar depressed patients. Further addition of paroxetine in non-responders to lithium plus lamotrigine did not appear to provide additional benefit, while it appeared to do so in non-responders to lithium plus placebo. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Efficacy and safety of lamotrigine as add-on treatment to lithium in bipolar depression: A multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/18095/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-02-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Objective: Lamotrigine is one of the pharmacologic options for the treatment of bipolar depression but has only been studied as monotherapy. This study compared the acute effects of lamotrigine and placebo as add-on therapy to ongoing treatment with lithium in patients with bipolar depression. Method: Outpatients (N = 124) aged 18 years and older with a DSM-IV bipolar I or II disorder and a major depressive episode (Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS] score ≥ 18 and Clinical Global Impressions-Bipolar Version [CGI-BP] severity of depression score ≥ 4) while receiving lithium treatment (0.6-1.2 mmol/L) were randomly assigned to 8 weeks of double-blind treatment with lamotrigine (titrated to 200 mg/d) or placebo. The primary outcome measure was mean change from baseline in total score on the MADRS at week 8. Secondary outcome measures were response (defined as a reduction of ≥ 50% on the MADRS and/or change of depression score on the CGI-BP of "much improved" or "very much improved" compared to baseline) and switch to mania or hypomania (defined as a CGI-BP severity of mania score of at least mildly ill at any visit). Patients were included in the study between August 2002 (Spain started in October 2003) and May 2005. Results: Endpoint mean change from baseline MADRS total score was -15.38 (SE = 1.32) points for lamotrigine and -11.03 (SE = 1.36) points for placebo (t = -2.29, df = 104, p = .024). Significantly more patients responded to lamotrigine than to placebo on the MADRS (51.6% vs. 31.7%, p = .030), but not on the CGI-BP change of depression (64.1% vs. 49.2%, p = .105). Switch to mania or hypomania occurred in 5 patients (7.8%) receiving lamotrigine and 2 patients (3.3%) receiving placebo (p = .441). Conclusion: Lamotrigine was found effective and safe as add-on treatment to lithium in the acute treatment of bipolar depression. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00224510.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>How ADAM-9 and ADAM-11 differentially from estrogen receptor predict response to tamoxifen treatment in patients with recurrent breast cancer: a retrospective study. (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/13955/</link>
      <pubDate>2005-10-15T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>PURPOSE: To evaluate the predictive value of the disintegrin and metalloproteinases, ADAM-9, ADAM-10, ADAM-11, and ADAM-12, and of the matrix metalloproteinases, MMP-2 and MMP-9, in patients with recurrent breast cancer treated with tamoxifen. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: A retrospective study was done on 259 frozen specimens of estrogen receptor-positive primary breast carcinomas from patients who developed recurrent disease and were treated with tamoxifen as the first line of therapy. The expression levels of the biological factors were assessed by real-time quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR. RESULTS: Using log-transformed continuous variables, increasing levels of ADAM-9 [odds ratio (OR) = 1.41; P = 0.015] and decreasing levels of MMP-9 (OR, 0.81; P = 0.035) predicted favorable disease control independent from the traditional predictive factors. Furthermore, when tumors were dichotomized at the median level of 70% tumor cell nuclei, our univariate analysis showed particularly strong results for the group of 153 patients with primary tumors containing 30% or more stromal cells. Although estrogen receptor levels lost their predictive power for this group of patients, high levels of ADAM-9 (OR, 1.59; P = 0.007) and ADAM-11 (OR, 1.65; P = 0.001) were significantly associated with a higher efficacy of tamoxifen therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that especially for primary tumors containing stromal elements, the assessment of mRNA expression levels of ADAM-9 and ADAM-11 could be useful to identify patients with recurrent breast cancer who are likely to benefit or fail from tamoxifen therapy.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Activin is produced by rat Sertoli cells in vitro and can act as an autocrine regulator of Sertoli cell function (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/8881/</link>
      <pubDate>1993-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Regulation of androgen receptor (AR) mRNA expression was studied in
      Sertoli cells and peritubular myoid cells isolated from immature rat
      testis, and in the lymph node carcinoma cell line derived from a human
      prostate (LNCaP). Addition of dibutyryl-cyclic AMP (dbcAMP) to Sertoli
      cell cultures resulted in a rapid transient decrease in AR mRNA expression
      (5 h), which was followed by a gradual increase in AR mRNA expression
      (24-72 h). This effect of dbcAMP mimicked follicle-stimulating hormone
      (FSH) action. In peritubular myoid cells, there was only a moderate but
      prolonged decrease during incubation in the presence of dbcAMP, and in
      LNCaP cells no effect of dbcAMP on AR mRNA expression was observed. When
      Sertoli cells or peritubular myoid cells were cultured in the presence of
      androgens, AR mRNA expression in these cell types did not change. This is
      in contrast to LNCaP cells, that showed a marked reduction of AR mRNA
      expression during androgen treatment. In the present experiments,
      transcriptional regulation of AR gene expression in Sertoli cells and
      LNCaP cells was also examined. Freshly isolated Sertoli cell clusters were
      transfected with a series of luciferase reporter gene constructs, driven
      by the AR promoter. It was found that addition of dbcAMP to the
      transfected Sertoli cells resulted in a small but consistent increase in
      reporter gene expression (which was interpreted as resulting from AR
      promoter activity); a construct that only contained the AR 5' untranslated
      region of the cDNA sequence did not show such a regulation. The same
      constructs, transfected into LNCaP cells, did not show any transcriptional
      down-regulation when the synthetic androgen R1881 was added to the cell
      cultures. A nuclear transcription elongation experiment (run-on), however,
      demonstrated that androgen-induced AR mRNA down-regulation in LNCaP cells
      resulted from an inhibition of AR gene transcription. The present results
      indicate that in Sertoli cells and LNCaP cells, hormonal effects on AR
      gene transcription play a role in regulation of AR expression. However, AR
      gene transcription in these cells is differentially regulated.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>