<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Visser, L.H.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/12255/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Risk factors for treatment related clinical fluctuations in Guillain-Barré syndrome. Dutch Guillain-Barré study group (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/8783/</link>
      <pubDate>1998-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The risk factors for treatment related clinical fluctuations, relapses
      occurring after initial therapeutic induced stabilisation or improvement,
      were evaluated in a group of 172 patients with Guillain-Barre syndrome.
      Clinical, laboratory, and electrodiagnostic features of all 16 patients
      with Guillain-Barre syndrome with treatment related fluctuations, of whom
      13 were retreated, were compared with those who did not have fluctuations.
      No significant differences were found between patients with Guillain-Barre
      syndrome treated with plasma exchange and patients treated with
      intravenous immune globulins either alone or in combination with high dose
      methylprednisolone. None of the patients with Guillain-Barre syndrome with
      preceding gastrointestinal illness, initial predominant distal weakness,
      acute motor neuropathy, or anti-GM1 antibodies showed treatment related
      fluctuations. On the other hand patients with fluctuations showed a trend
      to have the fluctuations after a protracted disease course. It is
      therefore suggested that treatment related clinical fluctuations are due
      to a more prolonged immune attack. There is no indication that the
      fluctuations are related to treatment modality. The results of this study
      may help the neurologist to identify patients with Guillain-Barre syndrome
      who are at risk for treatment related fluctuations.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>The Guillain-Barre Syndrome: Clinical subgroups, prognosis and treatment Clinical subgroups, prognosis and treatment (Doctoral Thesis)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/18141/</link>
      <pubDate>1997-05-14T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS) is a heterogeneous disease. The literature
dealing with the clinical pattern, prognosis and therapy of GBS is reviewed
in the first Chapter. New studies may define subgroups within the clinically
defined syndrome on the basis of clinicaL epidemiological, electrophysiological,
pathological, microbiological Of immunological criteria. The data
obtained during the Dutch GBS study evaluating the effect of intravenous
immune globulins (IVlg) in comparison with plasma exchange (PE) gave the
opportunity to further investigate the clinical symptoms and the laboratory
features of 147 GBS patients; a general summary of these features is given in
Chapter 2.
The first ain1 of this thesis was to evaluate whether clinical subgroups of GBS
are prcscnt~ to describe the clinical features in relation to the antecedent
infections, clectrodiagnostic and immunologic parameters and to evaluate
treatment effect (PE or JVIg) in these subgroups. In Chapter 3 the clinical
pattern of acute motor neuropathy and its relation with C(lmpy/obtlcterjejuni
(c. jejlllJl) infection is described, while in Chapter 4 cytomegalovirus related
GBS features are presented. In Chapter 5 the clinical and immunological differences
between C jejuni induced acute motor-sensory neuropathy and
C. jejulli induced acute motor neuropathy are described and discussed.
Not only the clinical pattern is variable, but also the clinical course and outcome.
The second objective was to identif}T prognostic factors related with
outcome of GBS and to assess whether there are differences in prognostic factors
between IVlg and PE treatment. The selection of patients with a poor
prognosis may be helpful for future therapeutic studies (Chapter 6).
One of these new therapies may be the combination of IVIg together with
intravenous methylprednisolone (MP). Therefore, the third aim was to
evaluate whether this combined treatment was more efFective than IVIg alone
(Chapter 7).
Finally, 8 to 10% of the GBS patients experience a secondary deterioration
after IVIg, MP-IVIg or PE treatment. Since it is important to know who are
at risk for such fluctuations we assessed the risk factors for these treatment
related fluctuations in GBS patients (Chapter 8).
A general discussion of the findings with recommendations for further
research is given in Chapter 9.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>