View Author
design screening consent group condition health study treatment guideline trial prerandomization people reference group evidence research participant appropriateness intervention university panelists rating reference netherland randomization prerandomization designs population cancer procedure center panel patient bene fit cluster practice method randomized expert factor decline insuf ficient evidence leiden university protocol violations aortic aneurysm person problem status ficient measurement disease burden prevention insuf 29 conditions expert panel difference protocol jungner effect wilson smoking leiden result ethic zelen /ucla insuf ficient activity violation information aneurysm speci dutch disagreement osteoporosis / journal radboud university nijmegen expert opinion aortic consent procedure outcome
4 Most Recent Publications
|
Assessment of appropriateness of screening community-dwelling older people to prevent functional decline
(Article)
Drewes, Y.M. Gussekloo, J. Schuurmans, M.J. Sturmans, F. Vries, N.K. de Westendorp, R.G.J. Wind, A.W. Assendelft, W.J. Meer, V. van der Rigter, H.G.M. Dekker, M.J.H.J. Goumans, M.J.B.M. Metsemakers, J.F.M. Overbeek, R. van Rooij, S.E.J.A. de Schers, H.J. |
2012-01-01
|
|
Indications and requirements for the use of prerandomization
(Article)
Schellings, R. Kessels, A.G. Riet, G. ter Sturmans, F. Widdershoven, G.A. Knottnerus, J.A. |
2009-04-01
|
|
Pre-randomisation in study designs: Getting past the taboo
(Article)
Schellings, R. Kessels, A.G. Sturmans, F. |
2008-01-01
|
|
Van wederzijds belang
(Inaugural Lecture)
Sturmans, F. |
1998-06-18
|