<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Meeuwesen, L.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/12604/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>The effect of educational intervention on intercultural communication: results of a randomised controlled trial (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/10386/</link>
      <pubDate>2005-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: Due to worldwide migration to Western countries, physicians
      are increasingly encountering patients with different ethnic backgrounds.
      Communication problems can arise as a result of differences in cultural
      backgrounds and poor language proficiency. AIMS: To assess the
      effectiveness of an educational intervention on intercultural
      communication aimed to decrease inequalities in care provided between
      Western and non-Western patients. DESIGN OF STUDY: A randomised controlled
      trial with randomisation at the GP level and outcome measurements at the
      patient level. SETTING: General practice in Rotterdam. METHOD:
      Thirty-eight Dutch GPs in the Rotterdam region, with at least 25% of
      inhabitants of non-Western origin, and 2407 visiting patients were invited
      to participate in the study. A total of 986 consultations were finally
      included. The GPs were educated about cultural differences and trained in
      intercultural communication. Patients received a videotaped instruction
      focusing on how to communicate with their GP in a direct way. The primary
      outcome measure was mutual understanding and the secondary outcomes were
      patient's satisfaction and perceived quality of care. The intervention
      effect was assessed for all patients together, for the 'Western' and
      'non-Western' patients, and for patients with different cultural
      backgrounds separately. RESULTS: An intervention effect was seen 6 months
      after the intervention, as improvement in mutual understanding (and some
      improvement in perceived quality of care) in consultations with
      'non-Western' patients. CONCLUSIONS: A double intervention on
      intercultural communication given to both physician and patient decreases
      the gap in quality of care between 'Western' and 'non-Western' patients.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>