http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/13027/ List of Publications en http://repub.eur.nl/static-eur/img/logo.png http://repub.eur.nl http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/36935/ 2007-03-01T00:00:00Z Objective: To test the hypotheses that adolescents have different perceptions of family-environmental factors than do their parents, and that dietary intake of adolescents is more highly associated with the adolescent's own perceptions than those of their parents. Design: Data from self-administered questionnaires were used. Participants: Five-hundred two students aged 12 to 14 years, and one of each student's parents. Main Outcome Measures: Two types of family-environmental factors (ie, family food rules and home availability and accessibility of food) for 3 self-reported dietary behaviors (ie, fruit, snack, and breakfast intake). Analysis: Unpaired t tests, chi-square tests, percentage (gross) disagreement, standardized regression coefficients, and linear regression analyses. Results: For most rules and most perceptions of availability and accessibility, considerable disagreement was found between parents and students. Self-reported intake of fruit and snacks was more highly associated with student measures, but breakfast intake was more highly associated with parent measures of rules and availability. Implications for Research and Practice: The findings might explain mixed results on the associations between family-environmental factors and children's dietary intake that were found in earlier studies. Researchers need to be aware that in studies into family-environmental determinants of dietary habits using self-reports, the results are possibly influenced by whether the data were reported by parents or by children. http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/1891/ 2004-01-01T00:00:00Z Environmental interventions as labeling of healthy foods and an increased availability of healthy foods may help consumers to meet the guidelines for a healthy diet. This article describes a study into the effectiveness of two environmental programs to be used in worksite cafeterias along with an educational program. The aim of the interventions was to reduce fat intake and increase fruit and vegetable intake. In the 'Labeling Program', low fat products were labeled. The 'Food Supply Program' comprised an increased availability of low-fat products and fruits and vegetables in worksite cafeterias. The 'Educational Program' consisted of information about healthy nutrition through brochures, table tents, a self help manual and posters. The design consisted of a pretest-posttest experimental control group design, with four conditions: the Educational Program, the Food Supply Program plus Educational Program, the Labeling Program plus Educational Program and a control group. Seventeen worksites were randomly assigned to one of the four research conditions. Total fat, fruit, and vegetable intake was measured with a quantitative, self-administered food frequency questionnaire (35 questions). Intake during lunch was measured by asking respondents to write down which food items they had purchased during their last lunch in the cafeteria. Furthermore, sales data for some targeted product categories were collected (milk, butter, cheese, meat products, desserts). For the whole study population, no significant effects on consumption data were found for any of the programs. The data showed a beneficial significant treatment effect of the Labeling Program on total fat intake, for respondents who believe they eat a high fat diet. Sales data revealed a significant effect of the labeling program on desserts, but not for the other products. http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/1892/ 2004-01-01T00:00:00Z This article describes the process evaluation of two environmental programs and a educational nutrition program, implemented at supermarkets and worksite cafeterias. Studies conducted earlier, indicated that the programs had no effect on consumers’ eating behavior. Consequently, the more specific purpose of the present study was to identify explanations for the ineffectiveness of the programs and to formulate recommendations for future programs. Materials and Methods The environmental programs included labeling of healthy products and increasing the range of healthy foods on offer. The education program consisted of several elements, such as brochures and a self-help guide. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with twenty-one managers of supermarkets and worksite cafeterias where the programs were implemented. Results Although materials were not always entirely compatible with the different supermarkets and worksite cafeterias, the degree of implementation was satisfactory. According to the managers, the programs were not striking enough, the labeling would have been more effective if it had discriminated between different brands of a product, and the number of new products was too small compared to the total range of foods on offer. Discussion The results can be used to help design and check future intervention programs for use at supermarkets or worksite cafeterias. Recommendations for future programs and research are given. http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/1893/ 2004-01-01T00:00:00Z In dit artikel worden twee studies beschreven naar de effectiviteit van twee omgevingsinterventies met als doel om de vetconsumptie te verlagen en de groente- en fruitconsumptie te verhogen. Beide studies vonden plaats in supermarkten en bedrijfsrestaurants. Het betrof een labelingsprogramma en een interventie waarbij het aanbod van gezonde voedingsmiddelen werd uitgebreid, in combinatie met een algemeen voorlichtingsprogramma. De studies waren experimenteel van opzet. Gegevensverzameling geschiedde door middel van vragenlijsten en het bijhouden van verkoopcijfers. De resultaten lieten geen effect zien van zowel de omgevings- als de voorlichtingsinterventies op het eetgedrag van de respondenten. Verkoopcijfers lieten een significant effect van de labelingsinterventie zien op het verkoopaandeel van magere desserts, echter voor de andere producten werden geen significante verschillen tussen condities gevonden. Geconcludeerd wordt dat de onderzochte omgevingsinterventies niet het verwachte effect sorteren, en dat vervolgonderzoek noodzakelijk is om meer inzicht te krijgen in welke type omgevingsinterventies mogelijk wel effectief zijn in het veranderen van eetgedrag.