<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Meyer, G.R. de</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/13102/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Leishmaniasis, contact hypersensitivity and graft-versus-host disease: Understanding the role of dendritic cell subsets in balancing skin immunity and tolerance (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/20371/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-08-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Dendritic cells (DC) are key elements of the immune system. In peripheral tissues, they function as sentinels taking up and processing antigens. After migration to the draining lymph nodes, the DC either present antigenic peptides by themselves or transfer them to lymph node-resident DC. The skin is the primary interface between the body and the environment and host's various DC subsets, including dermal DC (dDC) and Langerhans cells (LC). Because of their anatomical position in the epidermis, LC are believed to be responsible for induction of adaptive cutaneous immune responses. The functions of LC and dDC in the skin immune system in vivo are manifold, and it is still discussed controversially whether the differentiation of T-cell subtypes (e.g. effector T cells and regulatory T cells) may be initiated by distinct DC subtypes. As skin DC are able to promote or downmodulate immune responses, we chose different skin diseases (cutaneous leishmaniasis, contact hypersensitivity, UV radiation-induced suppression, and graft-versus-host disease) to describe the biological interactions between different DC subtypes and T cells that lead to the development of efficient or unwanted immune responses. A detailed knowledge about the immune modulatory capacity of different cutaneous DC subsets might be helpful to specifically target these cells through the skin during therapeutic interventions.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Intravascular thermography: Immediate functional and morphological vascular findings (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/10291/</link>
      <pubDate>2004-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>AIMS: To investigate safety, feasibility, and injurious effect on endothelial cells of a thermography catheter as well as effect of flow on measured temperature in non-obstructive arteries. METHODS AND RESULTS: Safety and feasibility were tested in both rabbit aortas and pig coronary arteries. Evaluation of endothelial damage by the catheter (acute, 7 and 14 days) was performed in pig coronaries using Evans Blue, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and Factor-VIII antibody and compared with normal arteries and arteries that underwent intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). The effect of flow on temperature heterogeneity was analysed both in vitro and in vivo conditions. All procedures were successful without any adverse events; intra- and inter-operator variability was low. Intracoronary use of the catheter was associated with acute but reversible de-endothelialization, paralleling the findings associated with IVUS use. Changes in flow velocities under physiologic flow conditions did not significantly influence the temperature differences measured both in vitro and in vivo; temperature heterogeneity was more pronounced in absence of flow. CONCLUSIONS: Intracoronary thermography using a dedicated catheter is safe and feasible with a similar degree of de-endothelialization as IVUS. Temperature heterogeneity remained unchanged under normal physiologic flow conditions allowing clinical use of thermography.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>