http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/13370/ List of Publications en http://repub.eur.nl/static-eur/img/logo.png http://repub.eur.nl http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/28704/ 2010-03-01T00:00:00Z Objectives: The aim of this study was to obtain a valid estimate of the clinical effects of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) in relation to age. Background: Treatment with PPCI is most beneficial in high-risk myocardial infarction patients. Paradoxically, elderly patients, who are at increased risk of adverse outcome, are often withheld PPCI. Methods: Individual patient data were obtained from 22 randomized trials (n = 6,763) evaluating the clinical effects of PPCI versus fibrinolysis (FL). Differences in 30-day death, repeat myocardial infarction, and stroke between patients randomized to FL and PPCI were determined in 5 age-strata: ≤50, >50 to 60, >60 to 70, >70 to 80, and >80 years. Treatment effects are reported as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Multivariable logistic regression analyses, which included age × treatment interaction, were applied to examine evidence of heterogeneity in age-specific ORs. Results: Thirty-day death increased with increasing age and ranged from 1.1% (FL) and 1.8% (PPCI) in patients ≤50 years to 26.4% and 18.3% in patients >80 years of age. The point estimate of treatment effect (overall adjusted OR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.52 to 0.79) was compatible with a mortality reduction favoring PPCI in all age-strata (except in patients ≤50 years of age), and 95% CIs were largely overlapping. There was no evidence of heterogeneity in ORs between age categories. Similar results were observed for repeat myocardial infarction and stroke. Conclusions: In this analysis of randomized trials, the reduction in clinical end points by PPCI was not influenced by age. Hence, age per se should not be considered an exclusion criterion for the application of PPCI. http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/13627/ 2005-01-01T00:00:00Z AIMS: We sought to characterize the outcomes of patients with a prior percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) who presented with a non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (ACS). METHODS AND RESULTS: We analysed the 30 and 180 day outcomes of 3012 patients with prior PCI and 21 154 patients without prior PCI enrolled in three randomized ACS trials (GUSTO IIb, PURSUIT, and PARAGON-B). The median (25th, 75th percentile) interval between the prior PCI and randomization was 647 (123, 1585) days. Patients with prior PCI had significantly more adverse baseline clinical characteristics, left ventricular dysfunction, and multi-vessel coronary artery disease. After adjusting for baseline characteristics and treatment, we found that patients with prior PCI had a significantly lower mortality rate at 30 days [hazard ratio (HR), 0.60; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.45-0.80; P=0.0006] and 180 days (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.66-0.98; P=0.029). However, no difference was observed in the composite of death or myocardial infarction (MI) at 30 days (HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.83-1.08; P=0.42) or 180 days (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.90-1.13; P=0.90). Patients with prior PCI had a higher rate of MI at 180 days (13.3 vs. 12.0%; P=0.045). Prior-PCI patients had lower incidences of in-hospital cardiogenic shock, congestive heart failure (CHF), and atrial fibrillation. CONCLUSION: Patients with prior PCI who present with non-ST-segment elevation ACS have a lower mortality rate than those without prior PCI. http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/5676/ 2002-01-19T00:00:00Z BACKGROUND: Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors have been shown to reduce cardiac complications in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. The clinical efficacy of these drugs in acute coronary syndromes, however, is still unclear. We did a meta-analysis of all large randomised trials designed to study the clinical efficacy and safety of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in patients with acute coronary syndromes who were not routinely scheduled to undergo early coronary revascularisation. METHODS: Inclusion criteria were: randomisation of patients with acute coronary syndromes but without persistent ST elevation; comparison of a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor with placebo or control therapy; non-recommendation of early coronary revascularisation during study-drug infusion; and enrollment of at least 1000 patients. Data on individual patients were obtained from all participants in these trials. FINDINGS: Six trials, enrolling 31402 patients, fulfilled the inclusion criteria. 30 days after randomisation, 3530 (11.2%) patients died or developed a myocardial infarction. At 30 days, a 9% reduction in the odds of death or myocardial infarction was seen with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors compared with placebo or control (10.8% [1980/18297] vs 11.8% [1550/13105] events; odds ratio 0.91 [95% CI 0.84-0.98]; p=0.015). The relative treatment benefit was similar in subgroups of patients according to important clinical baseline characteristics; hence, the absolute treatment benefit was largest in high-risk patients. An unexpected and significant interaction was seen between sex and allocated treatment, with a treatment benefit in men (0.81 [0.75-0.89] but not in women (1.15 [1.01-1.30]). However, once patients were stratified according to troponin concentration, there was no evidence of a sex difference in treatment response, and a risk reduction was seen in men and women with raised troponin concentrations. Major bleeding complications were increased by glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (2.4% [445/18297] vs 1.4% [180/13105]; p<0.0001), but intracranial bleeding was not (16 [0.09%] vs 8 [0.06%]; p=0.40). INTERPRETATION: Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors reduce the occurrence of death or myocardial infarction in patients with acute coronary syndromes not routinely scheduled for early revascularisation. The event reduction is greatest in patients at high risk of thrombotic complications. Treatment with a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor might therefore be considered especially in such patients early after admission, and continued until a decision about early coronary revascularisation has been made. http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9934/ 2002-01-01T00:00:00Z BACKGROUND: The prognosis of ventricular arrhythmias among patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes is unknown. We studied the incidence, predictors, and outcomes of sustained ventricular arrhythmias in 4 large randomized trials of such patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: We pooled the datasets of the Global Use of Streptokinase and tPA for Occluded Arteries (GUSTO)-IIb, Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa in Unstable Angina: Receptor Suppression Using Integrilin Therapy (PURSUIT), Platelet IIb/IIIa Antagonism for the Reduction of Acute Coronary Syndrome Events in a Global Organization Network (PARAGON)-A, and PARAGON-B trials (n=26 416). We identified independent predictors of ventricular fibrillation (VF) and ventricular tachycardia (VT) and compared the 30-day and 6-month mortality rates of patients who did (n=552) and did not (n=25 864) develop these arrhythmias during the index hospitalization. Independent predictors of in-hospital VF included prior hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, prior myocardial infarction, and ST-segment changes at presentation. Except for hypertension, these variables also independently predicted in-hospital VT. In Cox proportional-hazards modeling, in-hospital VF and VT were independently associated with 30-day mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 23.2 [95% CI, 18.1 to 29.8] for VF and HR, 7.6 [95% CI, 5.5 to 10.4] for VT) and 6-month mortality (HR, 14.8 [95% CI, 12.1 to 18.3] for VF and HR, 5.0 [95% CI, 3.8 to 6.5] for VT). These differences remained significant after excluding patients with heart failure or cardiogenic shock and those who died <24 hours after enrollment. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the use of effective therapies for non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes, ventricular arrhythmias in this setting are associated with increased 30-day and 6-month mortality. More effective therapies are needed to improve the survival of patients with these arrhythmias. http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/5542/ 1997-01-01T00:00:00Z http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/5550/ 1997-01-01T00:00:00Z We developed a logistic regression model with data from the GUSTO-I trial to predict mortality rate differences in individual patients who received accelerated tissue plasminogen activator (TPA) versus streptokinase treatment for acute myocardial infarction. A nomogram was developed from a reduced version of this model that approximated the underlying risk of patients treated with streptokinase, and thus the benefit of TPA. The 30-day mortality rate with accelerated TPA was 0.063 versus 0.073 with streptokinase and subcutaneously administered heparin and 0.074 with streptokinase and intravenously administered heparin. No baseline patient characteristics were significantly associated with a different relative effect of TPA. Older patients and those with anterior infarction, higher Killip classification (except Killip class IV), lower blood pressure, and increased heart rate had the greatest absolute benefit with accelerated TPA. Patients with acute myocardial infarction who had more high-risk characteristics derived a greater absolute benefit from treatment with accelerated TPA versus streptokinase. http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/5489/ 1995-01-01T00:00:00Z BACKGROUND. Patients with acute myocardial infarction who were treated with accelerated tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) (given over a period of 1 1/2 hours rather than the conventional 3 hours, and with two thirds of the dose given in the first 30 minutes) had a 30-day mortality that was 15 percent lower than that of patients treated with streptokinase in the Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO) study. This was equivalent to an absolute decrease of 1 percent in 30-day mortality. We sought to assess whether the use of t-PA, as compared with streptokinase, is cost effective. METHODS. Our primary, or base-case, analysis of cost effectiveness used data from the GUSTO study and life expectancy projected on the basis of the records of survivors of myocardial infarction in the Duke Cardiovascular Disease Database. In the primary analysis, we assumed that there were no additional treatment costs due to the use of t-PA after the first year and that the comparative survival benefit of t-PA was still evident one year after enrollment. RESULTS. One year after enrollment, patients who received t-PA had both higher costs ($2,845) and a higher survival rate (an increase of 1.1 percent, or 11 per 1000 patients treated) than streptokinase-treated patients. On the basis of the projected life expectancy of each treatment group, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio--with both future costs and benefits discounted at 5 percent per year--was$32,678 per year of life saved. The use of t-PA was least cost effective in younger patients and most cost effective in older patients. At all ages, the use of t-PA in patients with anterior infarctions yielded more favorable cost-effectiveness values. In our secondary analyses, the cost-effectiveness values were most sensitive to a lowering of the projected long-term survival benefits of t-PA and to moderate or greater increases in the projected medical costs for patients in the t-PA group after the first year. In contrast, our results were not sensitive to even very unfavorable assumptions about the additional costs associated with the higher rate of disabling stroke that was noted in patients treated with t-PA in the GUSTO study. CONCLUSIONS. The cost effectiveness of treatment with accelerated t-PA rather than streptokinase compares favorably with that of other therapies whose added medical benefit for dollars spent is judged by society to be worthwhile. http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/5496/ 1995-01-01T00:00:00Z BACKGROUND: The Global Utilization of Streptokinase and TPA for Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO-I) trial was designed to test whether thrombolytic strategies achieving more complete, early, sustained coronary artery patency would lead to further reductions in mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction. An angiographic substudy within GUSTO-I provided a unique opportunity to examine the relation between mortality and degrees of patency among the regimens. METHODS AND RESULTS: Four thrombolytic strategies were compared in 41,021 patients in GUSTO-I: streptokinase with subcutaneous or intravenous heparin, accelerated tissue plasminogen activator (TPA) with intravenous heparin, and combination streptokinase plus TPA with intravenous heparin. Accelerated TPA was associated with lower 30-day mortality (6.3%) than the other strategies (7.2%, 7.4%, and 7.0%, respectively). Among the 1210 patients in the angiographic substudy randomized to angiography 90 minutes after starting treatment, there was improved patency, particularly Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) grade 3 flow, with accelerated TPA over the other regimens (P < .0001). Coronary artery perfusion (TIMI grade 3) at 90 minutes was also a significant predictor of 30-day survival (P < .01). To determine whether differences in mortality among the four strategies matched differences in 90-minute patency, a model was developed for predicting mortality differences in the main trial from the angiographic substudy. The model assumed that any differences in treatment effects on 30-day mortality were mediated through differences in 90-minute patency for the four treatments. The predicted rates were then compared with observed mortality rates of the remaining patients in the main trial for each treatment group. The predicted and observed 30-day mortality rates of the four treatments were streptokinase with subcutaneous heparin, 7.46% versus 7.28%; streptokinase with intravenous heparin, 7.26% versus 7.39%; accelerated TPA, 6.31% versus 6.37%; and streptokinase plus TPA, 6.98% versus 6.96%. The correlation between predicted and observed results was .97, and the proportion of squared error explained (R2) was .92. CONCLUSIONS: The close relation between the predicted and observed 30-day mortality rates supports the concept that an important mechanism for improved survival with thrombolytic therapy is achievement of early, complete perfusion. The close match provides a strong biological explanation for the mortality differences seen in GUSTO-I and a sound rationale for the additional survival advantage of the accelerated TPA regimen. Irrespective of which treatment is used, early and complete restoration of infarct artery perfusion represents an essential goal of myocardial reperfusion therapy.