<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Trappenburg, M.J.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/13440/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Voice and Choice by Delegation (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/38721/</link>
      <pubDate>2013-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>In many Western countries, options for citizens to influence public services
are increased to improve the quality of services and democratize decision making.
Possibilities to influence are often cast into Albert Hirschman’s taxonomy of
exit (choice), voice, and loyalty. In this article we identify delegation as an important
addition to this framework. Delegation gives individuals the chance to practice exit/
choice or voice without all the hard work that is usually involved in these options.
Empirical research shows that not many people use their individual options of exit
and voice, which could lead to inequality between users and nonusers. We identify
delegation as a possible solution to this problem, using Dutch health care as a case
study to explore this option. Notwithstanding various advantages, we show that voice
and choice by delegation also entail problems of inequality and representativeness.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Differences in Quality of Antenatal Care Provided by Midwives to Low-Risk Pregnant Dutch Women in Different Ethnic Groups (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/38739/</link>
      <pubDate>2012-09-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Introduction: The objective of this study was to evaluate whether differences existed in the adherence to the Dutch national guidelines regarding basic antenatal care by Dutch midwives for low-risk women of different ethnic groups. Methods: This was an observational study using data from electronic antenatal charts of 7 midwife practices (23 midwives), participating in the Generation R Study. The Generation R Study is a multiethnic, population-based, prospective, cohort study that is investigating the growth, development, and health of urban children from fetal life until young adulthood. The study is conducted in Rotterdam, The Netherlands. The antenatal charts of 2093 low-risk pregnant women with an expected birthing date in 2002 through 2004 were used to determine the mean quality of antenatal care scores for 7 ethnic groups. These scores reflected the degree of adherence to the guidelines regarding 10 tests and examinations. Results: Few differences between ethnic groups were found in adherence to the guidelines that addressed the obstetric-technical quality of antenatal care. This finding applied more to nulliparous than to multiparous women. Adherence to guidelines was not always better in the antenatal care provided to native Dutch multiparous women when compared to other ethnic groups. Midwives adhered well to the guidelines regarding most tests. For all women, irrespective of ethnic background, hemoglobin was not measured as often as recommended, and this was especially the case for Moroccan, Surinamese-Creole, and Dutch-Antillean multiparous women. Discussion: The poorer adherence regarding screening for hemoglobin needs further investigation, as women with African or Mediterranean heritage are more at risk for hemoglobinopathies. However, in general, midwives adhered well to the clinical guidelines regarding most tests irrespective of the ethnic background of the pregnant women. When differences were present, these were not systematically less favorable for non-Dutch pregnant women. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Comparative review of family–professional communication: What mental health care can learn from oncology and nursing home care (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/32888/</link>
      <pubDate>2012-08-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Because family members take on caring tasks and also suffer as a consequence of the illness of the patient, communication between health‐care professionals and family members of the patient is important. This review compares communication practices between these two parties in three different parts of health care: oncology, nursing home care, and mental health care. It shows that there are important differences between sectors. Mental health stands out because contacts between family members and professionals are considered problematic due to the autonomy and confidentiality of the patient. The article explores several explanations for this, and, by comparing the three health sectors, distils lessons to improve the relationship between family members and health‐care professionals.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>De huisarts en de tijdgeest (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/37340/</link>
      <pubDate>2012-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Om te onderzoeken of de beroepsethiek van huisartsen veranderd
is door veranderende patiënten en het veranderende
overheidsbeleid hebben we Huisarts &amp; Wetenschap op kwalitatieve
wijze geanalyseerd voor de periode 1957 tot 2008. Daarnaast
hebben we semigestructureerde interviews gehouden met drie
generaties huisartsen. Het onderzoek laat zien dat de
huisartsgeneeskundige beroepsethische normen door de tijd
heen zijn veranderd. In de jaren vijftig en zestig van de vorige
eeuw is de huisarts opvoeder van de patiënt. De huisarts bepaalt
wat goed voor hem was. In de jaren zeventig is de huisarts nog
steeds opvoeder, maar nu wordt het belangrijk om de patiënt op
te voeden tot zelfstandigheid en eigen verantwoordelijkheid.
Deze roep om eigen verantwoordelijkheid is vooral afkomstig van
de huisarts en niet van de veranderende patiënt. In de jaren
negentig wordt terughoudend beleid een norm binnen de
beroepsethiek van de huisarts. Het overbrengen van dit
terughoudende beleid op de patiënt is echter lastig. De invoering
van marktwerking maakt het voor huisartsen nog moeilijker om
terughoudend te zijn met het verlenen van zorg. Hoe de
beroepsethiek verder zal evolueren hangt af van de eensgezindheid
onder huisartsen en van toekomstig overheidsbeleid.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>The doctor and the market: About the influence of market reforms on the professional medical ethics of surgeons and general practitioners in the Netherlands (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/34118/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-12-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>To explore whether market reforms in a health care system affect medical professional ethics of hospital-based specialists on the one hand and physicians in independent practices on the other. Qualitative interviews with 27 surgeons and 28 general practitioners in The Netherlands, held 2-3 years after a major overhaul of the Dutch health care system involving several market reforms. Surgeons now regularly advertise their work (while this was forbidden in the past) and pay more attention to patients with relatively minor afflictions, thus deviating from codes of ethics that oblige physicians to treat each other as brothers and to treat patients according to medical need. Dutch GPs have abandoned their traditional reticence and their fear of medicalization. They now seem to treat more in accordance with patients' preferences and less in accordance with medical need. Market reforms do affect medical professional principles, and it is doubtful whether these changes were intended when Dutch policy makers decided to introduce market elements in the health care system. Policy makers in other countries considering similar reforms should pay attention to these results. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Explaining Ethnic Differences in Late Antenatal Care Entry by Predisposing, Enabling and Need Factors in the Netherlands. The Generation R Study (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/24030/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-06-09T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Despite compulsory health insurance in Europe, ethnic differences in access to health care exist. The objective of this study is to investigate how ethnic differences between Dutch and non-Dutch women with respect to late entry into antenatal care provided by community midwifes can be explained by need, predisposing and enabling factors. Data were obtained from the Generation R Study. The Generation R Study is a multi-ethnic population-based prospective cohort study conducted in the city of Rotterdam. In total, 2,093 pregnant women with a Dutch, Moroccan, Turkish, Cape Verdean, Antillean, Surinamese Creole and Surinamese Hindustani background were included in this study. We examined whether ethnic differences in late antenatal care entry could be explained by need, predisposing and enabling factors. Subsequently, logistic regression analysis was used to assess the independent role of explanatory variables in the timing of antenatal care entry. The main outcome measure was late entry into antenatal care (gestational age at first visit after 14 weeks). With the exception of Surinamese-Hindustani women, the percentage of mothers entering antenatal care late was higher in all non-Dutch compared to Dutch mothers. We could explain differences between Turkish (OR = 0.95, CI: 0.57-1.58), Cape Verdean (OR = 1.65. CI: 0.96-2.82) and Dutch women. Other differences diminished but remained significant (Moroccan: OR = 1,74, CI: 1.07-2.85; Dutch Antillean OR 1.80, CI: 1.04-3.13). We found that non-Dutch mothers were more likely to enter antenatal care later than Dutch mothers. Because we are unable to explain fully the differences regarding Moroccan, Surinamese-Creole and Antillean women, future research should focus on differences between 1st and 2nd generation migrants, as well as on language barriers that may hinder access to adequate information about the Dutch obstetric system. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Patient participation in collective healthcare decision making: The Dutch model (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/19202/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-03-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Objective To study whether the Dutch participation model is a good model of participation. Background Patient participation is on the agenda, both on the individual and the collective level. In this study, we focus on the latter by looking at the Dutch model in which patient organizations are involved in many formal decision-making processes. This model can be described as neo-corporatist. Design We did 52 interviews with actors in the healthcare field, 35 of which were interviews with representatives of patient organizations and 17 with actors that involved patient organizations in their decision making. Results Dutch patient organizations have many opportunities to participate in formal healthcare decision making and, as a result, have become institutionalized. Although there were several examples identified in which patient organizations were able to influence decision making, patient organizations remain in a dependent position, which they try to overcome through professionalization. Discussion Although this model of participation gives patient organizations many opportunities to participate, it also causes important tensions. Many organizations cannot cope with all the participation possibilities attributed to them. This participation abundance can therefore cause redistribution effects. Furthermore, their dependent position leads to the danger of being put to instrumental use. Moreover, professionalization causes tensions concerning empowerment possibilities and representativeness. Conclusion Although the Dutch model tries to make patient organizations an equal party in healthcare decision making, this goal is not reached in practice. It is therefore important to study more closely which subjects patients can and should contribute to, and in what way.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Exciting but exhausting: Experiences with participatory research with chronically ill adolescents (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/19943/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-03-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Background Adolescents with chronic conditions are major users of paediatric hospitals, but seldom participate in the evaluation of services or in research. Little is known about the usefulness of the participatory approach in adolescent health research. Objective To evaluate the feasibility, benefits and limitations of a participatory research (PR) project involving chronically ill adolescents as co-researchers. Design, setting and participants Nine adolescents, aged 15-17 years, acted as co-researchers in a hospital-based PR project. They co-developed an interview protocol and during a disco party held for this purpose interviewed each other and 25 fellow patients (12-19 years). They provided advice on the draft report and participated in the dissemination of the results, but were not involved in the design of the project or analysis of results. Results Involving adolescents in participatory health research was feasible and appreciated by researchers and youth alike, but had its drawbacks too. The peer-research attracted few participants, the interviews lacked depth and did not yield substantial new insights. Maintaining a high level of participation of the chronically ill co-researchers also proved difficult. Conclusions Adolescents with chronic conditions like to have a say in the design and evaluation of hospital services. But their participation as co-researchers demands ample resources from all parties involved without automatically improving research quality. PR does not seem the most effective and efficient way to make services more responsive. We therefore recommend further exploration of other creative and sustainable ways for involving youth in health-care service development and innovation.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>The robustness of medical professional ethics when times are changing (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/19420/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-10-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Society in the 21st century is in many ways different from society in the 1950s, the 1960s or the 1970s. Two of the most important changes relate to the level of education in the population and the balance between work and private life. These days a large percentage of people are highly educated. Partly as a result of economic progress in the 1950s and the 1960s and partly due to the fact that many women entered the labour force, people started searching for ways to combine their career with family obligations and a private life (including hobbies, outings and holidays). Medical professional ethics, more specifically: professional attitudes towards patients and colleagues, is influenced by developments such as these, but how much and in what way? It was assumed that surgery ethics would be more robust, resistant to change and that general practitioner (GP) ethics would change more readily in response to a changing society, because surgeons perform technical work in operating theatres in hospitals whereas GPs have their offices in the midst of society. The journals of Dutch surgeons and GPs from the 1950s onwards were studied so as to detect traces of change in medical professional ethics in The Netherlands. GP ethics turned out to be malleable compared with surgery ethics. In fact, GP medicine proved to be an agent of change rather than merely responding to it, both with regard to the changing role of patients and with regard to the changing work life balance.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Reconsidering patient participation in guideline development (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/26961/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-09-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Health care has become increasingly patient-centred and medical guidelines are considered to be one of the instruments that contribute towards making it so. We reviewed the literature to identify studies on this subject. Both normative and empirical studies were analysed. Many studies recommend active patient participation in the process of guideline development as the instrument to make guidelines more patient-centred. This is done on the assumption that active patient participation will enhance the quality of the guidelines. We found no empirical evidence, however, to support this assumption. Moreover, the studies show that patients experience several difficulties in the participation process, which cannot solely be traced back to flawed practices. Given this poor track record we conclude that the plea to actively involve patients in the guideline development process should be reconsidered.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>The relationship between mental health workers and family members (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/17767/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Objective: To study the relationship between family members and mental health care workers to learn more about the support available to family members of mental health patients. Methods: Eighteen interviews were conducted with family members, seven with professionals and two with patients. Observations were performed at a long-term hospital ward and at family and client council meetings. Results: Family members perform an important carer role which greatly affects their lives. They need support from mental health professionals in order to cope. However, communication between mental health care workers and family members is problematic. Family members report a lack of information, consultation and support. Conclusion: Family members and mental health care workers frame the role of family members in the care process differently. Practice implications: Since the role of family members in the care process can be beneficial for all actors including the mental health patient it is important that mental health professionals acknowledge this and provide support to family members. Considering relatives as fellow carers (reframing their role) could be the way to do this.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Gezondheidszorg en democratie (Inaugural Lecture)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/7295/</link>
      <pubDate>2005-01-21T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description></description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>