<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Nevens, F.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/13451/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Everolimus with reduced tacrolimus improves renal function in de novo liver transplant recipients: A randomized controlled trial (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/38869/</link>
      <pubDate>2012-11-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>In a prospective, multicenter, open-label study, de novo liver transplant patients were randomized at day 30±5 to (i) everolimus initiation with tacrolimus elimination (TAC Elimination) (ii) everolimus initiation with reduced-exposure tacrolimus (EVR+Reduced TAC) or (iii) standard-exposure tacrolimus (TAC Control). Randomization to TAC Elimination was terminated prematurely due to a higher rate of treated biopsy-proven acute rejection (tBPAR). EVR+Reduced TAC was noninferior to TAC Control for the primary efficacy endpoint (tBPAR, graft loss or death at 12 months posttransplantation): 6.7% versus 9.7% (-3.0%; 95% CI -8.7, 2.6%; p&lt;0.001 for noninferiority [12% margin]). tBPAR occurred in 2.9% of EVR+Reduced TAC patients versus 7.0% of TAC Controls (p = 0.035). The change in adjusted estimated GFR from randomization to month 12 was superior with EVR+Reduced TAC versus TAC Control (difference 8.50 mL/min/1.73 m2, 97.5% CI 3.74, 13.27 mL/min/1.73 m2, p&lt;0.001 for superiority). Drug discontinuation for adverse events occurred in 25.7% of EVR+Reduced TAC and 14.1% of TAC Controls (relative risk 1.82, 95% CI 1.25, 2.66). Relative risk of serious infections between the EVR+Reduced TAC group versus TAC Controls was 1.76 (95% CI 1.03, 3.00). Everolimus facilitates early tacrolimus minimization with comparable efficacy and superior renal function, compared to a standard tacrolimus exposure regimen 12 months after liver transplantation. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>The long-term outcome of patients with polycystic liver disease treated with lanreotide (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/34913/</link>
      <pubDate>2012-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Background: Polycystic liver disease (PLD) is a phenotypical expression of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease and isolated polycystic liver disease. Somatostatin analogues, such as lanreotide, reduce polycystic liver volume. Aim To establish long-term outcome and safety of lanreotide. Methods This was an open-label, observational extension study of a 6-month, randomised, placebo-controlled trial with lanreotide (120 mg/month) in PLD. The length of total treatment was 12 months. Primary endpoint was relative change in liver volume, as determined by CT-volumetry after 12 months of treatment. We offered patients a CT scan 6 months after stopping lanreotide. Results A total of 41/54 (76%) patients participated in the extension study. Liver volume decreased by 4% (IQR -8% to -1%) after 12 months of treatment. The greatest effect was observed during the first 6 months of treatment (decrease of 4% (IQR -6% to -1%)). Liver volume remained unchanged during the following 6 months. We found that liver volume increased by 4% (IQR 0-6%) 6 months after end of treatment (n = 22). Conclusions Lanreotide reduces liver volume within the first 6 months of treatment and the beneficial effect is maintained in the following 6 months. Stopping results in recurrence of polycystic liver growth. This suggests that continuous use of lanreotide is needed to maintain its effect. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Relapse after treatment with peginterferon α-2b alone or in combination with lamivudine in HBeAg positive chronic hepatitis B (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/35180/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-10-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description></description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Long term clinical outcome of chronic hepatitis C patients with sustained virological response to interferon monotherapy (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/8295/</link>
      <pubDate>2004-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: The key end point for treatment efficacy in chronic hepatitis
      C is absence of detectable virus at six months after treatment. However,
      the incidence of clinical events during long term follow up of patients
      with sustained virological response is still poorly documented and may
      differ between the Eastern and Western world. AIMS: To assess clinical end
      points during long term follow up of European patients with a sustained
      virological response to interferon monotherapy. METHODS: Meta-analysis of
      individual patient data from eight European protocolled follow up studies
      of interferon treatment for chronic hepatitis C. RESULTS: A total of 286
      sustained virological responders and 50 biochemical responders (detectable
      virus but normal alanine aminotransferase levels) were followed up for 59
      months. Fifteen sustained virological responders (5.2%) had cirrhosis
      before treatment and 112 (39%) had genotype 1. The late virological
      relapse rate after five years of follow up was 4.7% (95% confidence
      interval (CI) 2.0-7.4) among sustained virological responders; all late
      relapses occurred within four years after treatment. Among sustained
      virological responders, the rate of decompensation after five years of
      follow up was 1.0% (95% CI 0.0-2.3) and none developed hepatocellular
      carcinoma (HCC). Survival was comparable with the general population,
      matched for age and sex, the standard mortality ratio being 1.4 (95% CI
      0.3-2.5). Clinical outcome of patients with cirrhosis was similar to other
      sustained virological responders. For biochemical responders, the rates of
      development of decompensation and HCC during long term follow up were 9.1%
      (95% CI 0.5-17.7) and 7.1% (95% CI 0-15.0), respectively. CONCLUSIONS:
      Five year survival of European sustained virological responders was
      similar to the overall population, matched for age and sex. No HCCs were
      detected during long term follow up.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Retreatment of hepatitis C non-responsive to interferon. A placebo controlled randomized trial of ribavirin monotherapy versus combination therapy with Ribavirin and Interferon in 121 patients in the Benelux [ISRCTN53821378]. (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/13192/</link>
      <pubDate>2003-08-29T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: Evidence based medicine depends on unbiased selection of
      completed randomized controlled trials. For completeness it is important
      to publish all trials. This report describes the first large randomised
      controlled trial where combination therapy was compared to placebo therapy
      and to ribavirin monotherapy, which has not been published until now.
      METHODS: One hundred and twenty one patients with chronic hepatitis C and
      elevated transaminases who did not respond to previous treatment with
      standard interferon monotherapy, were included from 16 centers in Belgium,
      the Netherlands and Luxembourg between 1992 and 1996. Patient
      poor-response characteristics were: genotype 1 (69%), HCV RNA above 2 x
      10(6) copies/ml (55%) and cirrhosis (38%). Patients were randomized to 6
      months combination therapy with interferon alpha-2b (3 MU tiw) and
      ribavirin (1000-1200 mg/day), 6 months ribavirin monotherapy (1000-1200
      mg/day) or 6 months ribavirin placebo. The study was double blinded for
      the ribavirin/placebo component. One patient did not fit the entry
      criteria, and 3 did not start. All 117 patients who received at least one
      dose of treatment were included in the intention to treat analysis.
      RESULTS: At the end of treatment, HCV RNA was undetectable in 35% of
      patients on combination therapy and in none of the patients treated with
      ribavirin monotherapy or placebo. The sustained virological response rate
      at 6 months after therapy was 15% for patients treated with interferon and
      ribavirin.During the 6 months treatment period 13% of patients on
      interferon ribavirin combination therapy, 13% of patients on ribavirin
      monotherapy and 11% of patients on placebo withdrew due to side effects or
      noncompliance. At 24 weeks of treatment the mean Hb level was 85% of the
      baseline value, which means a mean decrease from 9.1 mmol/l to 7.8 mmol/l.
      The Hb levels at the end of treatment were not significantly different
      from patients treated with ribavirin monotherapy (p = 0.76). End of
      treatment WBC was significantly lower in patients treated with combination
      therapy, compared to ribavirin (p &lt; 0.01) as well as for patients treated
      with ribavirin monotherapy compared to placebo (p &lt; 0.01). DISCUSSION:
      This belated report on the only placebo controlled study of interferon
      ribavirin combination therapy in non responders to standard doses of
      interferon monotherapy documents the effectiveness, be it limited, of this
      approach as well as the dynamics of the effects on blood counts.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>