<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Schnabel, R.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/13461/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Comparison of exogenous surfactant therapy, mechanical ventilation with high end-expiratory pressure and partial liquid ventilation in a model of acute lung injury (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9095/</link>
      <pubDate>1999-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>We have compared three treatment strategies, that aim to prevent
          repetitive alveolar collapse, for their effect on gas exchange, lung
          mechanics, lung injury, protein transfer into the alveoli and surfactant
          system, in a model of acute lung injury. In adult rats, the lungs were
          ventilated mechanically with 100% oxygen and a PEEP of 6 cm H2O, and acute
          lung injury was induced by repeated lung lavage to obtain a PaO2 value &lt;
          13 kPa. Animals were then allocated randomly (n = 12 in each group) to
          receive exogenous surfactant therapy, ventilation with high PEEP (18 cm
          H2O), partial liquid ventilation or ventilation with low PEEP (8 cm H2O)
          (ventilated controls). Blood-gas values were measured hourly. At the end
          of the 4-h study, in six animals per group, pressure-volume curves were
          constructed and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was performed, whereas in the
          remaining animals lung injury was assessed. In the ventilated control
          group, arterial oxygenation did not improve and protein concentration of
          BAL and conversion of active to non-active surfactant components increased
          significantly. In the three treatment groups, PaO2 increased rapidly to &gt;
          50 kPa and remained stable over the next 4 h. The protein concentration of
          BAL fluid increased significantly only in the partial liquid ventilation
          group. Conversion of active to non-active surfactant components increased
          significantly in the partial liquid ventilation group and in the group
          ventilated with high PEEP. In the surfactant group and partial liquid
          ventilation groups, less lung injury was found compared with the
          ventilated control group and the group ventilated with high PEEP. We
          conclude that although all three strategies improved PaO2 to &gt; 50 kPa, the
          impact on protein transfer into the alveoli, surfactant system and lung
          injury differed markedly.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>High-frequency oscillatory ventilation is not superior to conventional mechanical ventilation in surfactant-treated rabbits with lung injury (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9198/</link>
      <pubDate>1999-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The aim of this study was to compare high-frequency oscillatory
          ventilation (HFOV) with conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV) with and
          without surfactant in the treatment of surfactant-deficient rabbits. A
          previously described saline lung lavage model of lung injury in adult
          rabbits was used. The efficacy of each therapy was assessed by evaluating
          gas exchange, lung deflation stability and lung histopathology. Arterial
          oxygenation did not improve in the CMV group without surfactant but
          increased rapidly to prelavage values in the other three study groups.
          During deflation stability, arterial oxygenation decreased to postlavage
          values in the group that received HFOV alone, but not in both
          surfactant-treated groups (HFOV and CMV). The HFOV group without
          surfactant showed more cellular infiltration and epithelial damage
          compared with both surfactant-treated groups. There was no difference in
          gas exchange, lung deflation stability and lung injury between HFOV and
          CMV after surfactant therapy. It is concluded that the use of surfactant
          therapy in combination with high-frequency oscillatory ventilation is not
          superior to conventional mechanical ventilation in improving gas exchange,
          lung deflation stability and in the prevention of lung injury, if lungs
          are kept expanded. This indicates that achieving and maintaining alveolar
          expansion (i.e. open lung) is of more importance than the type of
          ventilator.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>