<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Akkooi, A.C.J. van</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/14031/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Comments and controversies: Sentinel node and lymphadenectomy in melanoma: Staging or therapeutical?: What to expect from the Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial-1 results in Melanoma? (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/40052/</link>
      <pubDate>2013-06-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description></description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>The analysis of the outcomes and factors related to iliac-obturator involvement in cutaneous melanoma patients after lymph node dissection due to positive sentinel lymph node biopsy or clinically detected inguinal metastases (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/40018/</link>
      <pubDate>2013-03-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Background: We assessed clinical-pathological features and outcomes of cutaneous melanoma patients after ilio-inguinal lymph node dissection (LND) in relation to the presence of metastases in iliac-obturator nodes. Methods: We analyzed 390 consecutive patients who underwent ilio-inguinal therapeutic LND [TLND] (237) due to clinical/cytologically detected metastases or after completion LND [CLND] (153) due to positive SLN biopsy (in one cancer centre 1994-2009). Median follow-up time was 60 months. Results: The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 49% and median OS-52 months in the entire group of patients. According to univariate analysis following factors had significant negative influence on OS: presence of metastases to iliac-obturator nodes (5-year OS for positive versus negative: 54.5% and 32%, respectively), macrometastases, higher Breslow thickness, ulceration, higher Clark level, male gender, number of metastatic lymph nodes, extracapsular extension, and, additionally in the CLND group-micrometastases size ≥0.1 mm according to the Rotterdam criteria and non-subcapsular location of micrometastases. Iliac-obturator involvement was also negative factor for OS in multivariate analysis. The presence of iliac-obturator nodal metastases correlated with the following factors: type of LND-CLND versus TLND (15% versus 27.5%) of iliac-obturator involvement, respectively), higher Breslow thickness, extracapsular extension of nodal metastases, male gender. We have not identified any metastases in iliac-obturator nodes in group of patients with micrometastases size ≤1.0 mm and primary tumour Breslow thickness &lt;4.0 mm or no ulcerated primary tumours. Conclusions: Metastases to iliac-obturator nodes have additional negative prognostic value for melanoma patients with inguinal basin involvement. We are able to identify the subgroup of patients after positive SLN biopsy without metastases to iliac-obturator nodes, probably requiring only inguinal LND. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Prognosis in patients with sentinel node-positive melanoma without immediate completion lymph node dissection (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/37376/</link>
      <pubDate>2012-10-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Background: The therapeutic value of immediate completion lymph node dissection (CLND) for sentinel node (SN)-positive melanoma is unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of immediate CLND on the outcome of patients with SN-positive melanoma. Methods: Patients with SN metastases treated between 1993 and 2008 at ten cancer centres from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Melanoma Group were included in this retrospective study. Maximum tumour size, intranodal location and penetrative depth of SN metastases were measured. Outcome in those who had CLND was compared with that in patients who did not undergo completion lymphadenectomy. Results: Of 1174 patients with SN-positive melanoma, 1113 (94·8 per cent) underwent CLND and 61 (5·2 per cent) did not. Median follow-up for the two groups was 34 and 48 months respectively. In univariable survival analysis, CLND did not significantly influence disease-specific survival (hazard ratio (HR) 0·89, 95 per cent confidence interval 0·58 to 1·37; P = 0·600). However, patients who did not undergo CLND had more favourable prognostic factors. Matched-pair analysis, with matching for age, Breslow thickness, tumour ulceration and SN tumour burden, showed that CLND had no influence on survival (HR 0·86, 0·46 to 1·61; P = 0·640). After adjusting for prognostic factors in multivariable survival analyses, no difference in survival was found. Conclusion: In these two cohorts of patients with SN-positive melanoma and prognostic heterogeneity, outcome was not influenced by CLND. Copyright </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Multimodality approach to the sentinel node: An algorithm for the use of presentinel lymph node biopsy ultrasound (after lymphoscintigraphy) in conjunction with presentinel lymph node biopsy fine needle aspiration cytology (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/30920/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-10-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>In a recent article by Lam et al. describing the experience of the Sydney Melanoma Unit, a novel term called 'multimodality approach' to the sentinel node (SN) was applied. However, the timing of the use of the tools available in the presented cases should be discussed. An algorithm of which time to use, which tool to detect the correct SN by preoperative ultrasound (US) in combination with an US-guided fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) will be proposed and demonstrated using five clinical examples. All examples prove the advantage of a combined strategy to track down the correct and involved SN. A sensitive US power mode, for the amplification of even the slightest changes in vascularization, is the most important tool in our diagnostic preoperative approach. First, reliable US criteria, as recently published must consequently be applied. Second, a FNAC should be performed early enough, even when only early signs are visible. Third, a swift overnight cytology before sentinel lymph node biopsy should be available. US is a method for the early detection of clinically nonevident metastases. Using the proposed algorithm when to perform which part of the multimodality approach, we demonstrated the enormous information out of additionally performed US. In the case of a suspicious US finding, we always perform a FNAC of the node. In the event of a negative finding, the SLND will take place as scheduled. In the case of a positive finding, the patient can directly undergo completion lymph node dissection. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Reply to I. Satzger et al (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/30891/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-09-10T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description></description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Prognosis in patients with sentinel node - positive melanoma is accurately defined by the combined Rotterdam tumor load and dewar topography criteria (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/26148/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-06-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Purpose: Prognosis in patients with sentinel node (SN) -positive melanoma correlates with several characteristics of the metastases in the SN such as size and site. These factors reflect biologic behavior and may separate out patients who may or may not need additional locoregional and/or systemic therapy. Patients and Methods: Between 1993 and 2008, 1,080 patients (509 women and 571 men) were diagnosed with tumor burden in the SN in nine European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) melanoma group centers. In total, 1,009 patients (93%) underwent completion lymph node dissection (CLND). Median Breslow thickness was 3.00 mm. The median follow-up time was 37 months. Tumor load and tumor site were reclassified in all nodes by the Rotterdam criteria for size and in 88% by the Dewar criteria for topography. Results: Patients with submicrometastases (&lt; 0.1 mm in diameter) were shown to have an estimated 5-year overall survival rate of 91% and a low nonsentinel node (NSN) positivity rate of 9%. This is comparable to the rate in SN-negative patients. The strongest predictive parameter for NSN positivity and prognostic parameter for survival was the Rotterdam-Dewar Combined (RDC) criteria. Patients with submicrometastases that were present in the subcapsular area only, had an NSN positivity rate of 2% and an estimated 5- and 10-year melanoma-specific survival (MSS) of 95%. Conclusion: Patients with metastases &lt; 0.1 mm, especially when present in the subcapsular area only, may be overtreated by a routine CLND and have an MSS that is indistinguishable from that of SN-negative patients. Thus the RDC criteria provide a rational basis for decision making in the absence of conclusions provided by randomized controlled trials. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Outcome After Therapeutic Lymph Node Dissection in Patients with Unknown Primary Melanoma Site (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/26358/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-05-25T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence and outcome of melanoma of unknown primary site (MUP) after therapeutic lymph node dissection (TLND) of palpable nodal melanoma metastases. Disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) time of MUP patients were analyzed and compared to patients undergoing a TLND for known primary melanomas (MKP). Methods: This single institution retrospective study analyzed 342 consecutive patients who were treated with 415 TLNDs for palpable nodal disease from 1982 to 2009. Univariate and multivariate analyses included: MUP versus MKP, gender, Breslow thickness, ulceration of primary tumor, site of primary tumor, site of dissection, extracapsular extension, number of collected nodes, number of positive nodes and the node positive ratio. Results: A total of 47 MUP were identified in 342 patients (13.7%). In univariate analysis, a trend was seen toward better survival for MUP patients compared to MKP patients having 5-year OS rates of 40% and 27%, respectively (P = 0.06). Multivariate analysis for OS showed two highly significant factors associated with worse prognosis: extracapsular extension and N3 status (both P &lt; 0.001). Two factors were associated with a significant better prognosis: MUP (P = 0.03) and a neck dissection (P = 0.04). Conclusions: Patients with MUP showed a statistically significant better OS compared to patients with melanoma metastases from known primary tumors. Presence of extracapsular extension and an increased number of positive nodes are statistically significantly negative prognostic factors for OS. The absence of a primary melanoma in stage III melanoma patients does not preclude surgery. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Therapeutic Surgical Management of Palpable Melanoma Groin Metastases: Superficial or Combined Superficial and Deep Groin Lymph Node Dissection (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/25761/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-05-03T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Background: Management of patients with clinically detectable lymph node metastasis to the groin is by ilioinguinal or combined superficial and deep groin dissection (CGD) according to most literature, but in practice superficial groin dissection (SGD) only is still performed in some centers. The aim of this study is to evaluate the experience in CGD versus SGD patients in our center. Methods: Between 1991 and 2009, 121 therapeutic CGD and 48 SGD were performed in 169 melanoma patients with palpable groin metastases at our institute. Median follow-up was 20 and, for survivors, 45 months. Results: In this heterogeneous group of patients, overall (OS) and disease-free survival, local control rates, and morbidity rates were not significantly different between CGD and SGD patients. However, CGD patients had a trend towards more chronic lymphedema. Superficial lymph node ratio, the number of positive superficial lymph nodes, and the presence of deep nodes were prognostic factors for survival. CGD patients with involved deep lymph nodes (24.8%) had estimated 5-year OS of 12% compared with 40% with no involved deep lymph nodes (p = 0.001). Preoperative computed tomography (CT) scan had high negative predictive value of 91% for detection of pelvic nodal involvement. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that survival and local control do not differ for patients with palpable groin metastases treated by CGD or SGD. Patients without pathological iliac nodes on CT might safely undergo SGD, while CGD might be reserved for patients with multiple positive nodes on SGD and/or positive deep nodes on CT scan. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Sentinel Node Tumor Load Assessment in Melanoma: Dilemmas and Clinical Management (Doctoral Thesis)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/22190/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-01-19T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Malignant Melanoma is the most aggressive form of skin cancer. Worldwide, the incidence
of melanoma has risen sharply of the past three decades. On the 1st of January
2007, there were nearly 800,000 people alive in the USA alone, who were diagnosed with
a melanoma. This increase is characterized largely by an increase in thin melanomas (1
mm or less; T1 tumors). Prognosis of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage
I / II ranges between 95% for T1 and 45% for T4 melanomas.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Multimarker Reverse Transcriptase-Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay in Lymphatic Drainage and Sentinel Node Tumor Burden (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/20595/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-12-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Purpose: We assessed molecular (presence of melanoma cells markers in lymph fluid [LY]) and pathological features (sentinel lymph node [SN] tumor burden according to Rotterdam criteria, metastases microanatomic location) and correlated them with survival and melanoma prognostic factors in a group of patients with positive SN biopsy. Methods: We analyzed 368 consecutive SN-positive patients after completion lymph node dissection (CLND). In 321 patients we obtained data on SLN microanatomic location/tumor burden (only 7 cases had metastases &lt;0.1 mm); in 137 we additionally analyzed 24-hour collected LY after CLND (multimarker reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction [MM-RT-PCR] with primers for tyrosinase, MART1 (MelanA), and uMAGE mRNA (27.7% positive samples)]. Median follow-up time was 41 months. Results: According to univariate analysis, the following factors had a negative impact on overall survival (OS): higher Breslow thickness (P = .0001), ulceration (P &lt; .0001), higher Clark level (P = .008), male gender (P = .0001), metastatic lymph nodes &gt;1 (P &lt; .0001), nodal metastases extracapsular extension (P &lt; .0001), metastases to additional non-SNs (P = .0004), micrometastases size ≥0.1 mm (P = .0006), and positive LY MM-RT-PCR (P = .0007). SN tumor burden showed linear correlation with increasing Breslow thickness (P = .01). The 5-year OS rates for SLN tumor burden &lt;0.1 mm, 1-1.0 mm, and &gt;1.0 mm were 84%/66%/44%, respectively, and for positive and negative LY MM-RT-PCR 47%/0%, respectively. The independent factors for shorter OS (multivariate analysis): male gender, primary tumor ulceration, number of involved nodes ≥4, micrometastases size &gt;1.0 mm, and, in additional model including molecular analysis-positive MM-RT-PCR results (hazard ratio [HR] 3.2), micrometastases size &gt;1.0 mm (HR 1.13), and primary tumor ulceration (HR 2.17). Similar results were demonstrated for disease-free survival (DFS) data. Conclusions: SN tumor burden categories according to Rotterdam criteria and the positive result of LY MM-RT-PCR assay demonstrated additional, independent prognostic value in SN-positive melanoma patients, showing significant correlation with shorter DFS and OS.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Role of ultrasound in the assessment of the sentinel node of melanoma patients (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/28001/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-12-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description></description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>EORTC Melanoma Group sentinel node protocol identifies high rate of submicrometastases according to Rotterdam Criteria (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/21118/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-09-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Sentinel node (SN) status is the most important prognostic factor for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in stages I-II melanoma. We evaluated the positive sentinel node identification rate of the EORTC Melanoma Group (MG) protocol as well as its capacity to identify minimal tumour burden, according to the Rotterdam Criteria in 421 consecutive patients. Correlations between primary tumour characteristics and SN tumour burden were investigated. The same 2 pathologists worked up all SNs according to the EORTC MG protocol and tumour burden was scored according to the Rotterdam Criteria (&lt;0.1 mm, 0.1-1.0 mm and &gt;1.0 mm for the largest diameter of the largest metastasis in the SN). The positive SN detection rate was 28.7% with a false negative rate of 10.4% at a median Breslow thickness of 2.1 mm. The high positive identification rate of about 30% of the EORTC MG protocol has been confirmed in this study. The protocol is sensitive and identifies submicrometastases (&lt;0.1 mm) in a high percentage (18%). The variables SN tumour load, non-SN (NSN) status and ulceration of the primary were independent prognostic factors for DFS and OS in the multivariate analysis. At a median follow-up time of 4.3 years patients with minimal tumour burden (&lt;0.1 mm) had a 5 year OS rate of 91%, virtually identical to 90% for SN-negative patients. The NSN positivity rate of 0% in these patients indicates that they may be spared a completion lymph node dissection (CLND) and its morbidity.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Unusual first presentation of metastatic pancreatic cancer as skin metastases in a burn patient (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/21219/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-09-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description></description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>The value of preoperative ultrasound (after lymphoscintigraphy) in conjunction with pre-sentinel lymph node biopsy fine-needle aspiration outweighs the usage of ultrasound alone in conjunction with lymphoscintigraphy: The need for an algorithm (Letter To Editor)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/20192/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-08-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description></description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>The value of preoperative ultrasound (after lymphoscintigraphy) in conjunction with pre-sentinel lymph node biopsy fine-needle aspiration outweighs the usage of ultrasound alone in conjunction with lymphoscintigraphy: The need for an algorithm (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/20526/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-08-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description></description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Importance of tumor load in the sentinel node in melanoma: Clinical dilemmas (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/28638/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-08-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>There are two hypotheses to explain melanoma dissemination: first, simultaneous lymphatic and hematogeneous spread, with regional lymph nodes as indicators of metastatic disease; and second, orderly progression, with regional lymph nodes as governors of metastatic disease. The sentinel node (SN) has been defined as the first draining lymph node from a tumor and is harvested with the use of the triple technique and is processed by an extensive pathology protocol. The SN status is a strong prognostic factor for survival (83-94% for SN negative, 56-75% SN-positive patients). False-negative rates are considerable (9-21%). Preliminary results of the MSLT-1 trial did not demonstrate a survival benefit for the SN procedure, although a subgroup analysis indicates a possible benefit. A mathematical model has demonstrated 24% prognostic false positivity. SN tumor burden represents a heterogenous patient population and is classified most frequently with the Starz, Dewar or Rotterdam Criteria. A completion lymph-node dissection might not be indicated in all SN-positive patients. Patients classified with metastases &lt;0.1 mm by the Rotterdam Criteria have excellent survival rates. Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology is emerging as a staging tool for high-risk patients, but more research is necessary before this can change clinical practice. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Epidemiology of extracutaneous melanoma in the Netherlands (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/28256/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-06-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Background: Reliable population-based incidence and survival data on extracutaneous melanoma (ECM) are sparse. Methods: Incidence data (1989-2006) from the Netherlands Cancer Registry were combined with vital status on January 1, 2008. Age-adjusted annual incidence rates were calculated by direct standardization, and the estimated annual percentage change was estimated to detect changing trends in incidence. Additionally, we carried out cohort-based relative survival analysis. Results: Ocular melanomas were the most common ECM subsite with European standardized incidence rates (ESR) of 10.7 and 8.2 per 1,000,000 person-years for males and females, respectively. In comparison, for cutaneous melanoma (CM), the ESRs for men and women were 122 and 155 per million person-years, respectively. No statistically significant trends in the incidence of ECM were detected, whereas an annual increase of 4.4% for men and 3.6% for women was detected in the incidence of CM. Relative survival for ECM was poor, but differed largely between anatomic subtypes ranging from a 5-year relative survival of 74% for ocular melanomas to 15% for certain subsites of mucosal melanomas. Conclusions: Of all ECM subsites, ocular melanomas had the highest incidence and the best survival. Mucosal melanomas were the second most frequent subsite of ECM. Five-year relative survival for all ECM subtypes was worse if compared with CM. No statistically significant trends in the incidence of (subsites of) ECM were determined. Impact: This study gives insight into the relative sizes of the different subgroups of ECM as well as an estimate of 5-year survival, which varies substantially by subsite. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Surgery of primary melanomas (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/32790/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-06-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Surgery remains the mainstay of melanoma therapy, regardless of the tumor site. Only the early diagnosis combined with proper surgical therapy currently gives patients affected by this malignancy the chance for a full cure. The main goal of surgical therapy is to provide the local control of the disease and to secure long-term survival of the patient without reasonable functional and esthetic impairment. The recommended method of biopsy-excisional biopsy, as an initial diagnostic and, to some extent, therapeutic procedure-is performed under local anesthesia as an elliptical incision with visual clear margins of 1-3 mm and with some mm of subcutaneous tissue. The extent of radical excision of the primary tumor (or scar after excisional biopsy) is based on the histopathologic characteristics of the primary tumor and usually consists of 1-2 cm margins with primary closure. The philosophy behind conducted randomized clinical trials has been to find the most conservative surgical approach that is able to guarantee the same results as more demolitive treatment. This has been the background of the trials designed to define the correct margins of excision around a primary cutaneous melanoma. Much less definition can be dedicated to the surgical management of patients with non-cutaneous melanomas. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>New developments in sentinel node staging in melanoma: Controversies and alternatives (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/28239/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-05-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Melanoma incidence is increasing worldwide. Elective lymph node dissections (ELNDs) could not improve survival. The sentinel node is a targeted approach to occult lymph node metastases. There are controversies regarding the sentinel node procedure for melanoma, with regard to false-negative rates, therapeutic benefit and alternatives, such as ultrasound. The clinical relevance of minimal sentinel node tumor burden is unclear. This review analyzes these issues. RECENT FINDINGS: Through the pathological work-up of the sentinel node, the sentinel node has become an independent prognostic factor for survival in melanoma. False-negative rates of the sentinel node procedure are generally an underestimation, due to incorrect calculations. A subgroup analysis of the Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial (MSLT)-1 seemed to demonstrate a survival benefit, but is criticized for a number of reasons. Potentially, a subgroup of sentinel node-positive patients is prognostically false-positive, with dormant metastases, which might not become viable disease. SUMMARY: Sentinel node tumor burden is an extra dimension to predict prognosis, although we have not yet identified the correct group to undergo a completion lymph node dissection. The MSLT-2 and MINITUB studies are analyzing this issue. The EORTC recommends the Rotterdam criteria as the most reproducible and accurate measure of sentinel node tumor burden. Ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology is emerging as a potential cost-effective alternative. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Potential cost-effectiveness of US-Guided FNAC in melanoma patients as a primary procedure and in follow-up (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/19297/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-02-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description></description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Expert opinion in melanoma: The sentinel node; EORTC Melanoma Group recommendations on practical methodology of the measurement of the microanatomic location of metastases and metastatic tumour burden (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/24338/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-11-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The sentinel node (SN) status has been recognised to be the most important prognostic factor in melanoma. Many studies have investigated additional factors to further predict survival/lymph node involvement. The EORTC Melanoma Group (MG) has formulated the following question: How should we report the microanatomic location and SN tumour burden? The EORTC MG recommends the following: the EORTC MG SN pathology protocol or a similarly extensive protocol, which has also been proven to be accurate, should be used. Only measure what you can see not what you presume. Cumulative measurements decrease the accuracy and reproducibility of measuring. The most reproducible measure is a single measurement of the maximum diameter of the largest lesion in any direction (1-D). If there is any infiltration into the parenchyma, this lesion can no longer be considered solely subcapsular. Reporting of the microanatomic location of metastases should be an assessment of the entire sentinel node, not only of the largest lesion. Multifocality reflects a scattered metastatic pattern, not to be confused with multiple cohesive foci, which fall under the regular location system. A subcapsular metastasis should have a smooth usually curved outline, not ragged or irregular. We recommend all pathologists to report the following items per positive SN for melanoma patients: the microanatomic location of the metastases according to Dewar et al. for the entire node, the SN Tumour Burden according to the Rotterdam Criteria for the maximum diameter of the largest metastasis expressed as an absolute number, and the SN Tumour Burden stratified per category; &lt;0.1 mm or 0.1-1.0 mm or &gt;1.0 mm. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Impact of molecular staging methods in primary melanoma (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/14941/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-12-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>PURPOSE: This study analyzes (1) the value of tyrosinase reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) of aspirates obtained by ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology (US-FNAC) of sentinel nodes (SNs) in patients with melanoma before sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and (2) the value of RT-PCR of blood samples of all SLNB patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2001 and 2003, 127 patients with melanoma (median Breslow depth, 2.1 mm) underwent SLNB. FNAC was performed in all SNs of all patients pre- and post-SLNB. The aspirates were partly shock-frozen for RT-PCR and were partly used for standard cytology. Peripheral blood was collected at the time of SLNB and at every outpatient visit thereafter. RESULTS: Thirty-four (23%) of 120 SNs were positive for melanoma. SN involvement was predicted by US-FNAC with a sensitivity of 82% and a specificity of 72%. Additional tyrosinase RT-PCR revealed the same sensitivity of 82% and a specificity of 72%. At a median follow-up time of 40 months from first blood sample, peripheral-blood RT-PCR was a significant independent predictor of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS; P &lt; .001). CONCLUSION: US-FNAC is highly accurate and eliminates the need for SLNB in 16% of all SLNB patients. RT-PCR of the aspirate or excised SN does not improve sensitivity or specificity. RT-PCR of blood samples predicts DFS and OS.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>The Rotterdam criteria for sentinel node tumor load: the simplest prognostic factor? (Letter To Editor)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/14950/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-12-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description></description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Detection of melanoma micrometastases in sentinel nodes - the cons (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/14940/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-09-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The sentinel node (SN) procedure in melanoma patients is important for prognostic information, but has no impact on survival. Micrometastases are identified in approximately 20% of the SNs. When a Completion Lymph Node Dissection (CLND) is performed for positive SN, additional non-SN lymph node involvement is also approximately 20%. Several classification criteria have been proposed to identify patients with SNs without a risk for additional nodes or a good prognosis. Micro anatomic analyses of metastatic SNs suggest that patients with sub-micrometastases (&lt;0.1mm) in the SN may be judged as SN negative. Patients with this limited tumor burden in their SN have an excellent prognosis and are highly unlikely to benefit from CLND. New techniques such as ultrasound of the lymph nodal basin can be promising as an alternative for SN biopsy.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Cutaneous melanoma and sentinel lymph node biopsy (Letter To Editor)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/14893/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-06-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>No abstract</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Isolated tumor cells and long-term prognosis of patients with melanoma (Letter To Editor)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/14892/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-05-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description></description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Sentinel lymph-node false positivity in melanoma (Letter To Editor)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/14939/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-04-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description></description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Multivariable analysis comparing outcome after sentinel node biopsy or therapeutic lymph node dissection in patients with melanoma (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/14938/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-10-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: Sentinel node (SN) status is the most important prognostic factor for overall survival in stage I or II melanoma. Yet SN-positive tumours with submicroscopic involvement of the SN (clusters of cells smaller than 0.1 mm) have shown a distant recurrence rate of only 9 per cent at 5 years, as good as that in SN-negative patients. This study compared the outcome after completion lymph node dissection (CLND) in SN-positive tumours with elective total lymph node dissection (TLND) in patients with palpable nodes. METHODS: A total of 188 patients were identified; 124 had TLND and 64 had CLND. Median follow-up was 56 and 37 months respectively. There were no significant differences between the groups regarding tumour Breslow thickness, ulceration and site of the primary tumour. Survival rates were calculated from date of primary excision. All patients with primary melanomas on extremities or trunk were included. RESULTS: On univariable analysis, the site of the primary tumour (extremity versus trunk) (P &lt; 0.001), Breslow thickness (P = 0.005) and ulceration (P &lt; 0.001) were prognostic for overall survival. There was a non-significant 13 per cent difference in overall survival at 5 years between CLND and TLND (P = 0.115). Excluding 15 patients who had SN disease with submicrometastases reduced the difference to 6 per cent (P = 0.415). CONCLUSION: This study showed no significant survival benefit for SN-positive CLND compared with TLND, especially when patients with nodes containing submicrometastases were excluded.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Isolated limb perfusion for an irresectable melanoma recurrence in a Jehovah's witness (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/14896/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-08-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Isolated limb perfusion (ILP) is a treatment option for irresectable melanoma lesions, because with ILP 20-fold higher concentrations of chemotherapy can be achieved locally than is systemically possible and high response rates are subsequently achieved. Jehovah's witnesses do not accept any form of blood transfusion, either autologous or homologous blood or only blood products. The use of an extracorporeal circuit, without the use of any blood products is acceptable for Jehovah's witnesses. The case of a 59-year-old Jehovah's witness with an irresectable melanoma recurrence for which an ILP. Because of adequate blood flow through the perfused limb, the limb did not become acidotic, even though there was a significant drop in the Hb concentration in the limb during the ILP. Isolated limb perfusions without the use of any blood transfusion products are technically possible, but an adequate preoperative hemoglobin concentration is a prerequisite.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Morbidity and prognosis after therapeutic lymph node dissections for malignant melanoma (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/14900/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-02-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Melanoma patients with clinically evident regional lymph node metastases are treated with therapeutic lymph node dissections (TLNDs). The aim of this study was to evaluate morbidity and mortality following TLND in our institution. Moreover, disease-free (DFS) and overall (OS) survival were evaluated and factors that influence prognosis after TLND were assessed. Between 1982 and 2005, 236 patients underwent a TLND. Patients, who received a palliative LND or a sentinel node procedure, were not included. The median Breslow thickness was 2.4mm. Ulceration was present in 23% of patients and unknown in 66%. 37 patients had unknown primary tumors. There were 129 ilio-inguinal, 50 axillary and 61 cervical dissections performed. 37% of the patients experienced at least one operation related complication. The most frequently seen complications were wound infections/necrosis and chronic lymph edema. Ilio-inguinal dissection patients experienced significantly more complications and a longer duration of hospitalization compared to axillary or cervical patients. The duration of hospitalization has been reduced in recent years from 12 to 5days. The mean follow-up was 29months. Kaplan-Meier estimated 5-year regional control was 79%, 5-year DFS was 19% and 5-year OS was 26%. The number of positive lymph nodes, the site of the primary tumor and extra capsular extension (ECE) were independent prognostic factors for DFS and only site and ECE for OS. In conclusion, TLND for stage III melanoma is accompanied with considerable short-term complications, and can achieve regional control and potential curation in approximately one in every four patients.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Sentinel node biopsy for clear cell sarcoma (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/14899/</link>
      <pubDate>2006-11-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Clear cell sarcoma (CCS), also known as clear cell sarcoma of tendons and aponeuroses or malignant melanoma of soft tissue, is a rare malignant tumor and is histogenitically related to melanoma. The aim of this study was to describe our experience with the sentinel node (SN) procedure for CCS patients and to discuss the potential value of this technique for CCS patients. Five patients with a subcutaneous CCS, who underwent an SN procedure, are described. Two patients had positive SNs, with additional tumor positive nodes in both lymph node dissection specimens. Only the patients with tumor positive SNs developed recurrent disease during an average follow-up of 33 months. None of the negative SN patients developed recurrent disease and all were alive after an average follow-up of 39 months. SN status seems to predict additional nodal involvement and recurrent disease as well as survival. The SN procedure might be a useful and accurate staging procedure in CCS patients, comparable to the situation in melanoma.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Clinical relevance of melanoma micrometastases (&lt;0.1 mm) in sentinel nodes: are these nodes to be considered negative? (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/14898/</link>
      <pubDate>2006-10-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>As only about 20% of sentinel node (SN) positive melanoma patients have additional non-SN lymph node involvement in the Completion Lymph Node Dissection (CLND) specimen, we tried to identify a SN positive patient group, which can be spared CLND. Micro anatomic analyses of metastatic SNs were performed to identify patient/tumor and/or SN factors predicting additional non-SN positivity as well as disease-free and overall survival. SN positivity was found in 77 of 262 stage I/II patients, included into a prospective database (10/97-5/04). Of 74 patients pathology material was available for re-evaluation. Micro anatomic analyses categorized topography of SN-metastases, Starz classification and amount of SN tumor burden. Additional non-SN positivity, DFS, OS and was calculated for all analyses. Mean Breslow thickness was 3.5 mm (0.8-12.0); mean FU was 35 (6-81) months. There was no additional non-SN positivity for SN-micrometastases &lt;0.1 mm. Topography of SN involvement had no impact on OS. Estimated 5-year OS rates for the different groups of &lt;0.1 mm, 0.1-1.0 mm and &gt;1.0 mm SN tumor burden were 100%, 63% and 35% respectively. Distant metastases were exceedingly rare (1/16 = 6.3%) in &lt;0.1 mm SN-positive patients. On multivariate analysis the SN tumor burden was the most important prognostic factor for DFS (P = 0.005) and OS (P = 0.03). Distant metastasis-free survival was identical (91%) to the 5-yr OS of SN negative patients, the estimated 5-yr OS was 100% for these patients and additional non-SN positivity was not observed. Therefore, our data suggest that patients with sub-micrometastases (&lt;0.1 mm) in the SN may be judged as SN negative, as non-stage III, and are highly unlikely to benefit from CLND, which we no longer recommend.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Extra-axial chordoma (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/14897/</link>
      <pubDate>2006-09-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>A chordoma which occurs as a primary tumour outside the axial skeleton is known as an extra-axial chordoma, parachordoma or chordoma periphericum. It is extremely rare and therefore survival, recurrence and the rates of metastasis are not known. Whilst few recurrences have been described, the extra-axial chordoma has the potential for late recurrence at up to 12 years. Metastases are even less frequent. We report the case of a 56-year-old woman who developed an extra-axial chordoma of the right thoracic wall in close relationship with the tenth rib. The tumour was completely removed and the prognosis is excellent.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>High positive sentinel node identification rate by EORTC melanoma group protocol (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/14895/</link>
      <pubDate>2006-02-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Methods to work-up sentinel nodes (SN) vary considerably between institutes. This single institution study evaluated the positive SN-identification rate of the EORTC Melanoma Group (MG) protocol and investigated the prognostic value of the SN status regarding disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) and evaluated the locoregional control after the SN procedure. Multivariate and univariate analyses using Cox's proportional hazard regression model was employed to assess the prognostic value of covariates regarding DFS and OS. The positive SN-identification rate was 29% at a median Breslow thickness of 2.00 mm and the false-negative rate was 9.4%. Breslow thickness and ulceration of the primary correlated with SN status. SN status, ulceration and site of the primary tumour correlated with DFS. SN status and ulceration of the primary correlated with OS. The in-transit metastasis rate correlated with SN-positivity, Breslow thickness and ulceration. Projected 3-year OS was 95% in SN-negative and 74% in SN-positive patients. Transhilar bivalving of the SN with step sections from the central planes is simple and had a high SN-positive detection rate of about 30%. The SN status is the most important predictive value for DFS and OS. In-transit metastasis rates correlated with SN-positivity, Breslow thickness and ulceration of the primary.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Schildwachtklierbiopsie bij het melanoom: prognostische betekenis en nadelen bij 300 patienten (Letter To Editor)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/14894/</link>
      <pubDate>2005-11-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>De Vries et al. ( 2005:1845-51 ) concluderen dat de uitslag van de schildwachtklier(SWK)-procedure bij melanoompatiënten de belangrijkste prognostische factor is. Tevens concluderen zij, volgens ons ten onrechte, dat de kans op in-transitmetastasen na een SWK-procedure mogelijk toeneemt. Een aantal zeer recente publicaties van grote studies met meer dan 5000 patiënten weerlegt deze opmerking...</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>