<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Schmidt, U.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/14097/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Additive utility in prospect theory (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/26889/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-05-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Prospect theory is currently the main descriptive theory of decision under uncertainty. It generalizes expected utility by introducing nonlinear decision weighting and loss aversion. A difficulty in the study of multiattribute utility under prospect theory is to determine when an attribute yields a gain or a loss. One possibility, adopted in the theoretical literature on multiattribute utility under prospect theory, is to assume that a decision maker determines whether the complete outcome is a gain or a loss. In this holistic evaluation, decision weighting and loss aversion are general and attribute-independent. Another possibility, more common in the empirical literature, is to assume that a decision maker has a reference point for each attribute. We give preference foundations for this attribute-specific evaluation where decision weighting and loss aversion are depending on the attributes. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>The Utility of Gambling Reconsidered (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/22984/</link>
      <pubDate>2004-12-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The utility of gambling, which entails an intrinsic utility or disutility of risk, has been alluded to in the economics literature for over a century. This paper demonstrates that any utility of gambling almost unavoidably implies a violation of fundamental rationality properties, such as transitivity or stochastic dominance, for static choices between gambles. This result may explain why the utility of gambling, a phenomenon so widely discussed, has never been formalized in the economics literature. The model of this paper accommodates well-known deviations from expected utility, such as the Allais paradox and the coexistence of gambling and insurance, while minimally deviating from expected utility.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>A Context-Dependent Model of the Gambling Effect (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/11033/</link>
      <pubDate>2002-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>A two-person game is formulated for a queuing situation involving a pair of exponential servers competing for arriving customers. The servers have identical characteristics except for their service rates. Each server is free to select its own service rate. The objective of each server is to select a service rate that will maximize its own profit. Arrivals are Poison. The probability that an arriving customer enters the queue is allowed to depend on the queue length at the time of arrival. The proportion of arrivals to a given server is shown to be strictly concave in the server's own service rate and decreasing in the other service rate. Furthermore, we show that when the cost function is convex and increasing, there exists a unique pure strategy Nash equilibrium point for the resulting game.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>