<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Olffen, W. van</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/14191/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Generic and specific social learning mechanisms in foreign entry location choice (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/25831/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-12-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>We combine economic and institutional theories of clustering in foreign entry location choice in an overarching social learning conceptualization. Prospective entrants learn about the attractiveness of alternative locations by observing the entry choices of previous investors ('models'). We distinguish two types of learning that differ in observational focus width but can and do operate simultaneously. With assessment learning, firms judge the economic feasibility and agglomeration benefits of entering a location by observing and following a broad set of models. With bandwagon learning, firm-level uncertainty narrows attention to, and prompts the following of, specific models, with recentness of model behavior an important moderator. We find broad support for our conceptualization in an analysis of the entries of 692 Japanese electronics firms into Chinese provinces during 1979-2001. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>When Do Procedural Fairness and Outcome Fairness Interact to Influence Employees’ Work Attitudes and Behaviors? The Moderating Effect of Uncertainty (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/20840/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-05-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Prior research has shown that procedural fairness interacts with outcome fairness to influence employees’ work attitudes (e.g., organizational commitment) and behaviors (e.g., job performance, organizational citizenship behavior), such that employees’ tendencies to respond more positively to higher procedural fairness are stronger when outcome fairness is relatively low. In the present studies, we posited that people’s uncertainty about their standing as organizational members would have a moderating influence on this interactive relationship between procedural fairness and outcome fairness, in that the interactive relationship was expected to be more pronounced when uncertainty was high. Using different operationalizations of uncertainty of standing (i.e., length of tenure as a proxy, along with self-reports and coworkers’ reports), we found support for this hypothesis in 4 field studies spanning 3 different countries.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>The Interaction between Personality, Social Network Position and Involvement in Innovation Process (Miscellaneous)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/26295/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-02-10T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Abstract
This dissertation proposal investigates how personality and individuals’ social network
position affect individuals’ involvement into the innovation process. It posits that people would
feel inclined to become involved into the different phases of the innovation process depending on
their Big Five personality traits. Additionally, this research elaborates on personality antecedents
of social relationships and network structure. Furthermore, it accounts for the dynamic
relationship between stages in innovation process and social network structure. Finally, it posits
that there is potentially a mismatch between social network structure in different stages of the
innovation process, and that this mismatch is caused by individuals’ personality. The suggested
conceptual framework contributes to the innovation literature by enriching our understanding of
why people create markedly different patterns of social ties in the workplace and how this tie
formation process and personality influence innovation process. An empirical study aimed at
testing the suggested propositions is suggested.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Who cares about organizational justice? How personality moderates the effects of perceived fairness on organizational attachment (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/14504/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-12-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The present article tests whether two theoretically relevant individual differences moderate the impact of perceived fairness on organizational attachment among young professionals in a large Dutch multinational firm. Drawing on the relational and control perspectives on organizational justice, we predict that any relationship between perceived fairness and organizational attachment will differ between individuals with varying beliefs in personal control and will be stronger for individuals with high interdependent self-construal (ISC). The findings revealed that almost all positive main effects of perceived fairness on organizational attachment were indeed moderated by either type of personality. As a result, we found support for both the relational as well as the control perspective, depending on the type of attachment considered. "Hard" reciprocation through extrarole behaviour seems to be inspired by the empowering impact of control through fairness. "Soft" reciprocation by affection and staying intentions (cognitions) on the other hand, results from the relational bond that is strengthened by fair treatment.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>