<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Geurts, J.J.M.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/14298/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Imagining sustainability: The added value of transition scenarios in transition management (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/18500/</link>
      <pubDate>2006-09-25T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Abstract
Purpose – To address lessons that specify the impact and contribution of current scenario methods when focused on facilitating transition management processes.
Design/methodology/approach – Comparative literature review based on transition management and
scenario development. Research limitations/implications – Need of further systemic thought about the required criteria of
transition scenarios and the embedding of scenario use in transition management processes.
Practical implications – Processes of transition management are in need of transition specific
scenarios.
Originality/value – Because transition management implies a complex and long-term steering
paradigm with which current scenario applications are not familiar, conclusions are drawn on the
(changing) requirements of scenario development processes in transition management and on the need
to innovate current scenario methods in the context of transition management.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Trends in socioeconomic health inequalities in the Netherlands, 1981-1999 (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/8376/</link>
      <pubDate>2002-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine changes in socioeconomic inequalities in
      self reported health in both the 1980s and the 1990s in the Netherlands.
      DESIGN: Analysis of trends in socioeconomic health inequalities during the
      last decades of the 20th century were made using data from the Health
      Interview Survey (Nethhis) and the subsequent Permanent Survey on Living
      Conditions (POLS) from Statistics Netherlands. Socioeconomic inequalities
      in self assessed health, short-term disabilities during the past 14 days,
      long term health problems and chronic diseases were studied in relation to
      both educational level and household income. Trends from 1981 to 1999 were
      studied using summary indices for both the relative and absolute size of
      socioeconomic inequalities in health. SETTING: The Netherlands.
      PARTICIPANTS: For the period 1981-1999 per year a random sample of about
      7000 respondents of 18 years and older from the non-institutionalised
      population. MAIN RESULTS: Socioeconomic inequalities in self assessed
      health showed a fairly consistent increase over time. Socioeconomic
      inequalities in the other health indicators were more or less stable over
      time. In no case did socioeconomic inequalities in health seemed to have
      decreased over time. Socioeconomic inequalities in self assessed health
      increased both in the 1980s and the 1990s. This increase was more
      pronounced for income (as compared with education) and for women (as
      compared with men). CONCLUSION: There are several possible explanations
      for the fact that, in addition to stable health inequalities in general,
      income related inequalities in some health indicators increased in the
      Netherlands, especially in the early 1990s. Most influential were perhaps
      selection effects, related to changing labour market policies in the
      Netherlands. The fact that the health inequalities did not decrease over
      recent years underscores the necessity of policies that explicitly aim to
      tackle these inequalities.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Income-related inequalities and inequities in health care utilisation: Belgium and the Netherlands compared (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/11381/</link>
      <pubDate>2001-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The Belgian Health Interview Survey held in 1997 is very comparable to the Netherlands Health Interview Survey 1997. We use data from both surveys to compare levels and distributions of health care utilization in both countries. In addition to testing for differences in level and distribu­tion of medical care utilization, this study also examines whether any of these differences are attributable to differences in health care system char­acteristics. Need-standardised concentration indices are used to measure the degree of income-related inequality and inequity. The findings are that, in general, Belgians are more intensive users of the health care system, with a higher use of the GP, the specialist, the hospital and prescribed medicines. The Dutch, on the other hand, report more frequent contacts with the dentist. No significant inequity is found for the utilization of GP or hospital inpatient care. Significant inequity is observed in both countries with respect to the number of specialist contacts only: higher income indi­viduals make more use of specialist services than expected on the basis of predicted need. The degree of such inequitable specialist use is remark­ably similar given the substantial differences in referral systems, copay­ments and doctor availability between both countries. Neither the abun­dant supply and direct accessibility of medical specialists in Belgium, nor the private insurance status of higher income individuals in the Netherlands can account for this finding.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Equity in the delivery of health care in Europe and the US (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/11391/</link>
      <pubDate>2000-09-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>This paper presents a comparison of horizontal equity in health care utilization in 10 European countries and the US. It does not only extend previous work by using more recent data from a larger set of countries, but also uses new methods and presents disaggregated results by various types of care. In all countries, the lower-income groups are more intensive users of the health care system. But after indirect standardization for need differences, there is little or no evidence of significant inequity in the delivery of health care overall, though in half of the countries, significant pro-rich inequity emerges for physician contacts. This seems to be due mainly to a higher use of medical specialist services by higher-income groups and a higher use of GP care among lower-income groups. These findings appear to be fairly general and emerge in countries with very diverse characteristics regarding access and provider incentives.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Educational differences in smoking: international comparison (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9345/</link>
      <pubDate>2000-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>OBJECTIVE: To investigate international variations in smoking associated
          with educational level. DESIGN: International comparison of national
          health, or similar, surveys. SUBJECTS: Men and women aged 20 to 44 years
          and 45 to 74 years. SETTING: 12 European countries, around 1990. MAIN
          OUTCOME MEASURES: Relative differences (odds ratios) and absolute
          differences in the prevalence of ever smoking and current smoking for men
          and women in each age group by educational level. RESULTS: In the 45 to 74
          year age group, higher rates of current and ever smoking among lower
          educated subjects were found in some countries only. Among women this was
          found in Great Britain, Norway, and Sweden, whereas an opposite pattern,
          with higher educated women smoking more, was found in southern Europe.
          Among men a similar north-south pattern was found but it was less
          noticeable than among women. In the 20 to 44 year age group, educational
          differences in smoking were generally greater than in the older age group,
          and smoking rates were higher among lower educated people in most
          countries. Among younger women, a similar north-south pattern was found as
          among older women. Among younger men, large educational differences in
          smoking were found for northern European as well as for southern European
          countries, except for Portugal. CONCLUSIONS: These international
          variations in social gradients in smoking, which are likely to be related
          to differences between countries in their stage of the smoking epidemic,
          may have contributed to the socioeconomic differences in mortality from
          ischaemic heart disease being greater in northern European countries. The
          observed age patterns suggest that socioeconomic differences in diseases
          related to smoking will increase in the coming decades in many European
          countries.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Morbidity differences by occupational class among men in seven European countries: an application of the Erikson-Goldthorpe social class scheme (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/8824/</link>
      <pubDate>1998-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: This paper describes morbidity differences according to
          occupational class among men from France, Switzerland, (West) Germany,
          Great Britain, the Netherlands, Denmark, and Sweden. METHODS: Data were
          obtained from national health interview surveys or similar surveys between
          1986 and 1992. Four morbidity indicators were included. For each country,
          individual-level data on occupation were recorded according to one
          standard occupational class scheme: the Erikson-Goldthorpe social class
          scheme. To describe the pattern of morbidity by occupational class, odds
          ratios (OR) were calculated for each class using the average of the
          population as a reference. The size of morbidity differences was
          summarized by the OR of two broad hierarchical classes. All OR were
          age-adjusted. RESULTS: For all countries, a lower than average prevalence
          of morbidity was found for higher and lower administrators and
          professionals as well as for routine nonmanual workers, whereas a higher
          than average prevalence was found for skilled and unskilled manual workers
          and agricultural workers. Self-employed men were in general healthier than
          the average population. The relative health of farmers differed between
          countries. The morbidity difference between manual workers and the class
          of administrators and professionals was approximately equally large in all
          countries. Consistently larger inequality estimates, with no or slightly
          overlapping confidence intervals, were only found for Sweden in comparison
          with Germany. CONCLUSIONS: Thanks to the use of a common social class
          scheme in each country, a high degree of comparability was achieved. The
          results suggest that morbidity differences according to occupational class
          among men are very similar between different European countries.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Differences in self reported morbidity by educational level: a comparison of 11 western European countries (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/8833/</link>
      <pubDate>1998-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess whether there are variations between 11 Western
      European countries with respect to the size of differences in self
      reported morbidity between people with high and low educational levels.
      DESIGN AND METHODS: National representative data on morbidity by
      educational level were obtained from health interview surveys, level of
      living surveys or other similar surveys carried out between 1985 and 1993.
      Four morbidity indicators were included and a considerable effort was made
      to maximise the comparability of these indicators. A standardised scheme
      of educational levels was applied to each survey. The study included men
      and women aged 25 to 69 years. The size of morbidity differences was
      measured by means of the regression based Relative Index of Inequality.
      MAIN RESULTS: The size of inequalities in health was found to vary between
      countries. In general, there was a tendency for inequalities to be
      relatively large in Sweden, Norway, and Denmark and to be relatively small
      in Spain, Switzerland, and West Germany. Intermediate positions were
      observed for Finland, Great Britain, France, and Italy. The position of
      the Netherlands strongly varied according to sex: relatively large
      inequalities were found for men whereas relatively small inequalities were
      found for women. The relative position of some countries, for example,
      West Germany, varied according to the morbidity indicator. CONCLUSIONS:
      Because of a number of unresolved problems with the precision and the
      international comparability of the data, the margins of uncertainty for
      the inequality estimates are somewhat wide. However, these problems are
      unlikely to explain the overall pattern. It is remarkable that health
      inequalities are not necessarily smaller in countries with more
      egalitarian policies such as the Netherlands and the Scandinavian
      countries. Possible explanations are discussed.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Supplier-induced demand for physiotherapy in the Netherlands (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/11470/</link>
      <pubDate>1987-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Empirical studies of supplier-induced demand in health care have mostly concentrated on the analysis of physician behaviour. In this article, the focus is on the economic determinants of physiotherapist behaviour in The Netherlands. It is shown that relative prices work as strong incentives to alter the mix of services supplied, conform to the model of revenue maximization under a production constraint. However, the time-series analysis also gives some indication that this ability to influence the demand for their services to increase hourly income is not fully exploited. The latter finding is inconsistent with pure income maximization but rather points to a trade-off between loss of revenue and demand manipulation. The fact that the choice of therapy varies with the pressure on provider incomes does cast some doubt on the appropriateness of the chosen patterns of treatment in terms of effectiveness.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>