<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Warlop, L.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/14567/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Identity-based consumer behavior (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/37768/</link>
      <pubDate>2012-10-22T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Although the influence of identity on consumer behavior has been documented in many streams of literature, the absence of a consistent definition of identity and of generally accepted principles regarding the drivers of identity-based behavior complicates comparisons across these literatures. To resolve that problem, we propose a simple but inclusive definition of identity. Identity can be defined as any category label with which a consumer self-associates that is amenable to a clear picture of what a person in that category looks like, thinks, feels and does. Building from this definition, we propose the following five basic principles that can help researchers model the process of identity formation and expression: (1) Identity Salience: identity processing increases when the identity is an active component of the self; (2) Identity Association: the non-conscious association of stimuli with a positive and salient identity improves a person's response to the stimuli; (3) Identity Relevance: the deliberative evaluation of identity-linked stimuli depends on how diagnostic the identity is in the relevant domain; (4) Identity Verification: individuals monitor their own behaviors to manage and reinforce their identities; and (5) Identity Conflict: identity-linked behaviors help consumers manage the relative prominence of multiple identities. To illustrate the potential usefulness of these principles for guiding identity research, we discuss new avenues for identity research and explain how these principles could help guide investigations into these areas. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Embodied myopia and purchasing behaviour (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/40037/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-10-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>In conventional thinking, the mind controls the body. Our
brains decide something and the body follows suit. However,
in many ways this turns out not to be the case. Indeed, our
research has found that even simple postures and gestures
may be enough to influence our purchasing behaviour.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Embodied Myopia (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/40038/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>One field study and five experiments show that seemingly irrelevant bodily actions influence consumer behavior. These studies demonstrate that arm flexion (in which the motor action is directed toward the self) versus arm extension (in which the motor action is directed away from the self) influences purchase behavior, product preferences, and economic decisions. More specifically, arm flexion increases the likelihood of purchasing vice products (Study 1a), leads to a preference for vices over virtues (Studies 1b and 2a), and leads to preference for smaller, sooner over larger, later monetary rewards (Studies 2b, 3, and 4). The authors argue that arm flexion induces present-biased preferences through activation of approach motivation. The effect of bodily actions on present-biased preferences is regulated by the behavioral approach system (Studies 3 and 4) and relies on the learned association between arm flexion and activation of this approach system (Study 4). The authors discuss implications for intertemporal decision making, embodied cognition, and marketing practice.

</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>When do primes prime? The moderating role of the self-concept in individuals' susceptibility to priming effects on social behavior (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/14140/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Using cooperative behavior in economic decision-making settings, we predicted and found that people's susceptibility to priming influences is moderated by two factors: people's chronic accessibility to a behavioral repertoire and people's self-concept activation. In Experiment 1, we show that individuals highly consistent in their social value orientation (SVO) assimilate their behavior to their dispositions rather than to the primes, whereas the opposite effect is obtained among individuals with a low consistent SVO. In Experiment 2, we show that low consistent SVO individuals become less susceptible to priming influences when their self-concept is activated. These studies shed new light on individuals' susceptibility to priming influences on social behavior.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Distinctive Brand Cues and Memory for Product Consumption Experiences (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/12040/</link>
      <pubDate>2005-03-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Consumer welfare depends upon how well people learn and remember quality differences among competing products. Although some researchers have argued that consumers are quite good at learning from actual consumption experience, such learning is complicated by delays between learning episodes and by delays between learning and use of the information. In the present research, we examine consumer experiential learning from a memory perspective. In a series of three taste-test studies we investigate whether and how distinctive brand names and packaging may facilitate the learning of intrinsic quality differences among products. We discuss the implications of our results for consumer decision theory, brand equity management, and trademark policy.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>