<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Alba, J.W.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/14570/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Decision Neuroscience (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/12169/</link>
      <pubDate>2005-12-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>This article presents an introduction to and analysis of an emerging area of research, namely decision neuroscience, whose goal is to integrate research in neuroscience and behavioral decision making. The article includes an exposition of (1) how the exponential accumulation of knowledge in neuroscience can potentially enrich research on decision making, (2) the range of techniques in neuroscience that can be used to shed light on various decision making phenomena, (3) examples of potential research in this emerging area, and (4) some of the challenges readers need to be cognizant of while venturing into this new area of research.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Irrelevant Information and Mediated Intertemporal Choice (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/12044/</link>
      <pubDate>2004-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Results from 4 experiments suggest that currencies such as loyalty-program points are overvalued. Different allocations of the same quantity of points across the same number of purchases (e.g., 100 points for each first, 200 for each second, 300 for each third purchase vs. 200 for each first, second, and third purchase) yielded irrelevant trends and should have led participants to ignore loyalty points as a basis for choice. However, choices were influenced by points even when consumers were provided with other truly discriminating information (e.g., price) and the irrelevance of the loyalty points was readily discernable. This implies that irrelevant information can influence choice when other, easily justifiable bases for decisions are available and, therefore, that irrelevant information can function as more than a tie-breaker. Other implications for research on irrelevant attributes, medium effects, intertemporal choice, and loyalty programs are discussed.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Locus of Equity and Brand Extension (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/12045/</link>
      <pubDate>2003-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Prevailing wisdom assumes that brand equity increases when a brand touts its desirable attributes. We report conditions under which the use of attribute information to promote a product can shift the locus of equity from brand to attribute, thereby reducing the attractiveness of extension products. This effect is moderated by the degree of ambiguity in the learning environment, such that prevailing wisdom is refuted when ambiguity is low but is supported when ambiguity is high.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Consumer Learning and Brand Equity (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/12048/</link>
      <pubDate>2000-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>A series of experiments illustrates a learning process that enhances brand equity at the expense of quality-determining attributes. When the relationship between brand name and product quality is learned prior to the relationship between product attributes and quality, inhibition of the latter may occur. The phenomenon is shown to be robust, but its influence appears sensitive to contextual variations in the learning environment. Tests of process are inconsistent with attentional explanations and popular models of causal reasoning, but they are supportive of associative learning models that portray learners as inherently forward looking</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Consumer Learning and Brand Equity (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/16343/</link>
      <pubDate>2000-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Abstract
A series of experiments illustrates a learning process that enhances brand equity at the expense of quality-determining attributes. When the relationship between brand name and product quality is learned prior to the relationship between product attributes and quality, inhibition of the latter may occur. The phenomenon is shown to be robust, but its influence appears sensitive to contextual variations in the learning environment. Tests of process are inconsistent with attentional explanations and popular models of causal reasoning, but they are supportive of associative learning models that portray learners as inherently forward looking.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>