<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Salm, C.A. van der</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/14634/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>A critical test of the choice questionnaire for collecting informed public opinions (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/12223/</link>
      <pubDate>1997-05-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>In the Choice Questionnaire (Neijens et al. 1992) respondents have to choose between several policy options. Within this questionnaire they are provided with information about the consequences of each option. Until now, only indirect evidence as to whether or not respondents base their preferences on the information provided was available and plausible alternative explanations for the Choice Questionnaire's effect could not be ruled out. In the present study, we demonstrate that Choice Questionnaire respondents do base their preferences on the information provided: different information resulted in significantly different choices.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>