<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Salvatori, M.P.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/14910/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Usefulness and limitations of dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease in patients with left bundle branch block. A multicentre study. (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/12886/</link>
      <pubDate>2000-10-30T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: Patients with left bundle branch block exhibit abnormal septal
      motion which may limit the interpretation of stress echocardiograms. This
      study sought to assess the diagnostic value of dobutamine-atropine stress
      echocardiography in left bundle branch block patients. METHODS AND
      RESULTS: Sixty-four left bundle branch block patients (mean age 59 years,
      24 men) with suspected coronary artery disease underwent
      dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography and coronary arteriography.
      Myocardial ischaemia was defined as new or worsening wall thickening
      abnormalities. Coronary artery disease was quantitatively defined as a
      diameter stenosis &gt;/=50% in a major epicardial artery. Rest septal motion
      was normal (apart from the early systolic septal notch) in 34 patients
      (53%) and abnormal in 30 patients (47%). Rest septal thickening was normal
      in 32 patients (50%) and abnormal in 32 patients (50%). All seven patients
      with a QRS duration &gt;/=160 ms and an abnormal QRS axis had abnormal rest
      septal motion and thickening. Inter-observer agreement for ischaemia was
      88%. In all but one patient disagreement was in the septum. For the
      anterior and posterior circulation, respectively, sensitivity was 60%
      (9/15) and 67% (8/12), specificity was 94% (46/49) and 98% (51/52), and
      accuracy was 86% (55/64) and 92% (59/64). Sensitivity for the anterior
      circulation tended to be better in patients with normal rest septal
      thickening (83% vs 44%). CONCLUSIONS: Dobutamine-atropine stress
      echocardiography has excellent diagnostic specificity in left bundle
      branch block patients with suspected coronary artery disease. In patients
      with abnormal rest septal thickening, however, dobutamine-atropine stress
      echocardiography may lack good sensitivity for detection of coronary
      artery disease in the anterior circulation. Left bundle branch block
      patients who potentially most benefit from dobutamine-atropine stress
      echocardiography may initially be selected by their resting
      electrocardiogram.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>