<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Cost, B.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/14968/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Quantifying the added value of BNP in suspected heart failure in general practice: An individual patient data meta-analysis (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/26274/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-06-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Background: Diagnosing early stages of heart failure with mild symptoms is difficult. B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) has promising biochemical test characteristics, but its diagnostic yield on top of readily available diagnostic knowledge has not been sufficiently quantified in early stages of heart failure. Objectives: To quantify the added diagnostic value of BNP for the diagnosis of heart failure in a population relevant to GPs and validate the findings in an independent primary care patient population. Design: Individual patient data meta-analysis followed by external validation. The additional diagnostic yield of BNP above standard clinical information was compared with ECG and chest x-ray results. Patients and methods: Derivation was performed on two existing datasets from Hillingdon (n=127) and Rotterdam (n=149) while the UK Natriuretic Peptide Study (n=306) served as validation dataset. Included were patients with suspected heart failure referred to a rapid-access diagnostic outpatient clinic. Case definition was according to the ESC guideline. Logistic regression was used to assess discrimination (with the c-statistic) and calibration. Results: Of the 276 patients in the derivation set, 30.8% had heart failure. The clinical model (encompassing age, gender, known coronary artery disease, diabetes, orthopnoea, elevated jugular venous pressure, crackles, pitting oedema and S3 gallop) had a c-statistic of 0.79. Adding, respectively, chest x-ray results, ECG results or BNP to the clinical model increased the c-statistic to 0.84, 0.85 and 0.92. Neither ECG nor chest x-ray added significantly to the 'clinical plus BNP' model. All models had adequate calibration. The 'clinical plus BNP' diagnostic model performed well in an independent cohort with comparable inclusion criteria (c-statistic=0.91 and adequate calibration). Using separate cut-off values for 'ruling in' (typically implying referral for echocardiography) and for 'ruling out' heart failure - creating a grey zone - resulted in insufficient proportions of patients with a correct diagnosis. Conclusion: BNP has considerable diagnostic value in addition to signs and symptoms in patients suspected of heart failure in primary care. However, using BNP alone with the currently recommended cut-off levels is not sufficient to make a reliable diagnosis of heart failure.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>The prognosis of heart failure in the general population: The Rotterdam Study. (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/12933/</link>
      <pubDate>2001-08-22T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>AIMS: To determine the prognosis, cause of death, and its determinants in
          participants of the population-based Rotterdam Study who were found to
          have heart failure. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 5255 Rotterdam Study
          participants (aged 68.9+/-8.6 years, 3113 women) the presence of heart
          failure was determined. Data were analysed with Cox's proportional-hazards
          models. One hundred and eighty-one participants (age 77.3+/-7.9 years, 109
          women) had heart failure. Of these 85 (47%) died during the 4.8-8.5 (mean
          6.1) years of follow-up. One, 2 and 5 years' survival was 89%, 79%, and
          59%, representing an age-adjusted mortality twice that of persons without
          heart failure (hazard ratio 2.1, 95% CI 1.8-2.7). The hazard ratio for
          sudden death was even more pronounced: 4.8, (95% CI 2.6-8.7). Diabetes
          mellitus, impairment of renal function and atrial fibrillation were
          associated with a poor outcome. A higher blood pressure and body mass
          index conferred a more favourable prognosis in those with heart failure.
          CONCLUSION: Heart failure generally afflicts older subjects in the
          community, carries a poor prognosis, especially in the presence of
          concomitant diseases, and confers a fivefold increase in the risk of
          sudden death.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Heart Failure in the Elderly (Doctoral Thesis)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/21280/</link>
      <pubDate>2000-02-16T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Heart failure is a clinical syndrome with various causes for which no universally
accepted definition exists. Packer's definition of heart failure "representing a
complex clinical syndrome characterised by abnonnalities of left ventricular function
and neurohumoral regulation. which are accompanied by effort intolerance, fluid
retention and reduced longevity" reveals the complexity of the syndrome.
Heart failure is one of the commonest cardiovascular disorders in Western Society and a
growing major public health problem. It has been estimated that in the Netherlands the
number of hospital discharges for heart failure rose from 14441 in 1980 to 25966 in
1993. The prevalence of heart failure rises rapidly with age from 0.7% in those aged
55-64 to 13.0% in those aged 74-84.4 This indicates a rapidly expanding problem
mainly due to an increase in the number of elderly.
Despite the facl that heart failure and its precursor left ventricular systolic dysfunction
are increasingly being recognised as important causes for morbidity and mortality,
epidemiologic data are scarce. l For example, reliable information on the incidence of
the syndrome is very limited. One of the reasons of the lack of epidemiologic data on
heart failure is the difficulty of diagnosing early slages of heart failure and the virtual
absence of target cohort studies. In the Netherlands and in the UK most heart failure
patients are detected and treated in general practice. Heart failure is difficult to diagnose
by the general practitioner due to the unavailability of morc sophisticated or invasive
diagnostic tools and is primarily based on clinical judgement. In recent years
neurohumoral and Doppler echocardiographic measurements have emerged as noninvasive
tools that could aid in the diagnosis of heart failure, also in a non-hospital
setting.
Heart fallure carries a poor prognosis, but, again, data from population-based studies,
notably those addressing the prognostic implications of asymptomatic ventricular
dysfullction, is limited.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>