Nikken, J.J.

Costs and effectiveness of a brief MRI examination of patients with acute knee injury (Article)

2009-02-01T00:00:00Z

The aim of this study was to assess the costs and effectiveness of selective short magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with acute knee injury. A model was developed to evaluate the selective use of MRI in patients with acute knee injury and no fracture on radiography based on the results of a trial in which 208 patients were randomized between radiography only and radiography plus MRI. We analyzed medical (diagnostic and therapeutic) costs, quality of life, duration of diagnostic workup, number of additional diagnostic examinations, time absent from work, and time to convalescence during a 6-month follow-up period. Quality of life was lowest (EuroQol at 6 weeks 0.61 (95% CI 0.54–0.67)); duration of diagnostic workup, absence from work, and time to convalescence were longest; and the number of diagnostic examinations was largest with radiography only. These outcomes were more favorable for both MRI strategies (EuroQol at 6 weeks 0.72 (95% CI 0.67–0.77) for both). Mean total costs were 2,593 euros (95% CI 1,815–3,372) with radiography only, 2,116 euros (95% CI 1,488–2,743) with radiography plus MRI, and 1,973 euros (95% CI 1,401–2,543) with selective MRI. The results suggest that selective use of a short MRI examination saves costs and potentially increases effectiveness in patients with acute knee injury without a fracture on radiography.

Value of information analysis used to determine the necessity of additional research: MR imaging in acute knee trauma as an example (Article)

2008-02-01T00:00:00Z

Purpose: To help guide future outcomes research regarding the use of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in patients with acute knee trauma in an emergency department setting, with use of prospective data from a randomized clinical trial and value of information analysis. Materials and Methods: A total of 189 patients (123 male, 66 female; mean age, 33.4 years) were randomly assigned to undergo radiography alone (n = 93) or radiography and MR imaging (n = 96). Institutional review board approval and informed consent (parental consent for minors) were obtained. During 6 months of follow-up, data on quality of life and 39 cost parameters were collected. Value-of-information analysis was used to estimate the expected benefit of future research to eliminate the decision uncertainty that remained after trial completion. In addition, the parameters that were responsible for most of the decision uncertainty were identified, the expected benefits of various study designs were evaluated, and the optimal sample size was estimated. Results: Only three parameters were responsible for most of the decision uncertainty: number of quality-adjusted life-years, cost of an overnight hospital stay, and friction costs. A study in which data on these three parameters are gathered would have an optimal sample size of 3500 patients per arm and would be expected to result in a societal benefit of €5.6 million or 70 quality-adjusted life-years. Conclusion: The optimal study design for use of MR imaging to evaluate acute knee trauma involves a trial in which there are 3500 patients per trial arm, and data on the number of quality-adjusted life-years, cost of an overnight hospital stay, and friction costs are collected.

MRI of the kidney—state of the art (Article)

2007-11-01T00:00:00Z

Ultrasound and computed tomography (CT) are modalities of first choice in renal imaging. Until now, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has mainly been used as a problem-solving technique. MRI has the advantage of superior soft-tissue contrast, which provides a powerful tool in the detection and characterization of renal lesions. The MRI features of common and less common renal lesions are discussed as well as the evaluation of the spread of malignant lesions and preoperative assessment. MR urography technique and applications are discussed as well as the role of MRI in the evaluation of potential kidney donors. Furthermore the advances in functional MRI of the kidney are highlighted.

Acute peripheral joint injury: cost and effectiveness of low-field- strength MR imaging--results of randomized controlled trial. (Article)

2005-09-01T00:00:00Z

PURPOSE: To assess prospectively if a short imaging examination performed with low-field-strength dedicated magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in addition to radiography is effective and cost saving compared with the current diagnostic imaging strategy (radiography alone) in patients with recent acute traumatic injury of the wrist, knee, or ankle. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval and informed consent were obtained. Patients with recent trauma of the wrist, knee, or ankle were randomized across two diagnostic strategies: radiography alone (reference group) or radiography followed by a short MR imaging examination (intervention group). Measures of effectiveness included the number of additional diagnostic procedures, time to last diagnostic procedure, and number of days absent from work. Measures of effectiveness were analyzed by using an exact Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test. Time to convalescence and quality of life were analyzed by using a t test. Cost analysis was performed from a societal perspective and analyzed by using a t test. RESULTS: Five hundred patients (207 women, 293 men; mean age, 34.8 years) with acute injury of the wrist, knee, or ankle were randomized. In the intervention group, quality of life for patients with knee injuries was significantly higher during the first 6 weeks, and time to completion of diagnostic work-up was significantly shorter (mean, 3.5 days for intervention group vs 17.3 days for reference group). The number of additional diagnostic procedures was significantly lower in the intervention group versus the reference group (nine vs 35, respectively) for patients with knee injuries. Patients with knee injuries showed the largest difference in costs (intervention group, 1820 [$1966]; reference group, 2231 [$2409]) owing to a reduction in productivity loss. Costs were higher in patients with wrist injuries and almost equal in patients with ankle injuries. All cost differences, however, were not significant. CONCLUSION: Compared with radiography, MR imaging in patients with acute wrist or ankle injuries is neither cost saving nor effective in expediting diagnostic work-up or improving quality of life. In patients with knee injuries, a short MR imaging examination shortens the time to completion of diagnostic work-up, reduces the number of additional diagnostic procedures, improves quality of life in the first 6 weeks, and may reduce costs associated with lost productivity.

Acute wrist trauma: value of a short dedicated extremity MR imaging examination in prediction of need for treatment (Article)

2005-01-01T00:00:00Z

PURPOSE: To assess predictive value of a short magnetic resonance (MR) imaging examination in addition to or instead of radiography in patients with acute wrist trauma to identify patients who require additional treatment versus those who do not and can be discharged without further follow-up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Informed consent was obtained from all participating patients; the institutional review board approved the randomized controlled trial and use of data to create prediction models. Of 90 patients (37 female, 53 male; mean age, 40.0 years), 87 with acute wrist trauma were randomized to undergo radiography (n = 43) or radiography and a short MR imaging examination with low-field-strength dedicated extremity MR system (n = 44). Age, sex, trauma mechanism, presence of tenderness of the anatomic snuffbox, radiographic results, MR imaging results, and treatment data were collected. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to create four models for prediction of treatment need. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients had one or more fractures; one patient had a marked soft-tissue lesion. In univariable analysis, age (odds ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval: 1.00, 1.05), anatomic snuffbox tenderness (odds ratio, 2.31; 95% confidence interval: 0.90, 5.96), radiographic results (odds ratio, 31.2; 95% confidence interval: 8.90, 109), and positive MR imaging results versus MR imaging not performed (odds ratio, 1.86; 95% confidence interval: 0.57, 6.06) were significantly predictive of treatment need. In multivariable analysis, radiographic results (odds ratio, 24.7; 95% confidence interval: 6.59, 93.1) and positive MR imaging results (odds ratio, 6.28; 95% confidence interval: 1.27, 31.0) were significantly predictive of treatment need. Negative MR imaging results were not significantly predictive (odds ratio, 0.87; 95% confidence interval: 0.20, 3.82). CONCLUSION: A short MR imaging examination with a low-field-strength MR imaging system following radiography in initial evaluation of patients with acute wrist trauma has additional value in prediction of treatment need; it does not have value in identification of patients who can be discharged without further follow-up.

Acute knee trauma: value of a short dedicated extremity MR imaging examination for prediction of subsequent treatment (Article)

2005-01-01T00:00:00Z

PURPOSE: To assess the predictive value of a short magnetic resonance (MR) imaging examination, in addition to or instead of radiography, performed in patients with acute knee trauma to identify those who require additional treatment versus those who do not and can be discharged without further follow-up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The randomized controlled trial and use of collected data for prediction modeling were approved by the institutional review board; informed consent was obtained. Patients with recent knee injury were included in the trial if radiography was ordered. They were randomized into a group undergoing only radiography and a group undergoing radiography plus immediate MR imaging. A 0.2-T dedicated extremity MR imager and four short pulse sequences were used. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate patient characteristics, trauma mechanism, and findings at radiography and MR imaging for their value in prediction of need for subsequent treatment within the 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: Data in 189 patients (123 male patients, 66 female patients; mean age, 33.4 years), 109 of whom underwent treatment after their initial visit, were analyzed. Age of 30 years or older, indirect trauma mechanism, radiographic results, and MR imaging results were significant predictors of need for treatment in univariable and multivariable analyses (P < .05). In the multivariable analysis, only abnormal MR imaging results were significantly predictive of need for treatment, and only when MR imaging replaced radiography (odds ratio, 2.61; 95% confidence interval: 1.12, 6.06). CONCLUSION: Implementation of a dedicated extremity MR imaging examination, in addition to or instead of radiography, performed in patients with traumatic knee injury improves prediction of the need for additional treatment but does not significantly aid in identification of patients who can be discharged without further follow-up. Value of a short MR imaging examination in the initial stage after knee trauma is limited.

Acute ankle trauma: value of a short dedicated extremity MR imaging examination in prediction of need for treatment (Article)

2005-01-01T00:00:00Z

PURPOSE: To assess predictive value of a short magnetic resonance (MR) imaging examination with or instead of radiography performed in patients with acute ankle trauma to identify those who require additional treatment versus those who do not and can be discharged without further follow-up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Informed consent was obtained from all participating patients, and the institutional review board approved the randomized controlled trial and use of data to create prediction models. In a prospective controlled trial, 197 patients with recent ankle trauma (92 women, 105 men) were randomized into two groups: those who underwent radiography and those who underwent a combination of radiography and MR imaging. Data about side of injury, trauma mechanism, and results of radiography and MR imaging were collected. Additional treatment was necessary in 109 of 197 patients after their initial hospital visit. With univariable and multivariable regression analysis, four models were created for prediction of treatment. RESULTS: In univariable analysis, age (odds ratio [OR], 1.02; 95% confidence interval: 1.00, 1.04), radiographic results (OR, 7.92; 95% confidence interval: 3.17, 19.8), and positive or uncertain results in patients who underwent MR imaging versus patients who did not (OR, 2.42; 95% confidence interval: 1.25, 4.70) were predictive of treatment. In the multivariable analysis, positive or uncertain MR imaging results (OR, 2.61; 95% confidence interval: 1.28, 5.30) contributed significantly to prediction of subsequent treatment. Negative MR imaging results did not contribute significantly (OR, 0.66; 95% confidence interval: 0.27, 1.61). CONCLUSION: A limited MR imaging examination in initial evaluation of acute ankle injury with radiography has additional predictive value in identification of patients who need treatment but does not add significant information in identification of those who can be discharged without further follow-up. A limited MR imaging examination cannot replace radiography for prediction of need for additional treatment.

MR imaging of the menisci and cruciate ligaments: a systematic review. (Article)

2003-03-01T00:00:00Z

PURPOSE: To systematically review and synthesize published data on the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the menisci and cruciate ligaments and to assess the effect of study design characteristics and magnetic field strength on diagnostic performance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Articles published between 1991 and 2000 were included if at least 30 patients were studied, arthroscopy was the reference standard, the magnetic field strength was reported, positivity criteria were defined, and the absolute numbers of true-positive, false-negative, true-negative, and false-positive results were available or derivable. Pooled weighted and summary receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed for tears of both menisci and both cruciate ligaments separately and for the four lesions combined, by using random effects models. Differences were assessed according to lesion type. RESULTS: Twenty-nine of 120 retrieved articles were included. Pooled weighted sensitivity was higher for medial meniscal tears than that for lateral meniscal tears. However, pooled weighted specificity for the medial meniscus was lower than that for the lateral meniscus. In summary ROC analyses performed per lesion, various study design characteristics were found to influence diagnostic performance. Higher magnetic field strength significantly improved discriminatory power only for anterior cruciate ligament tears. When all lesions were combined in one overall summary ROC analysis, magnetic field strength was a significant but modest predictor of diagnostic performance. CONCLUSION: Diagnostic performance of MR imaging of the knee is different according to lesion type and is influenced by various study design characteristics. Higher magnetic field strength modestly improves diagnostic performance, but a significant effect was demonstrated only for anterior cruciate ligament tears.