<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Lingen, R.A. van</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/15173/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Morphine glucuronidation in preterm neonates, infants and children younger than 3 years (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/24997/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-08-12T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Background and objective: A considerable amount of drug use in children is still unlicensed or off-label. In order to derive rational dosing schemes, the influence of aging on glucuronidation capacity in newborns, including preterms, infants and children under the age of 3 years was studied using morphine and its major metabolites as a model drug. Methods: A population pharmacokinetic model was developed with the nonlinear mixed-effects modelling software NONMEM® V, on the basis of 2159 concentrations of morphine and its glucuronides from 248 infants receiving intravenous morphine ranging in bodyweight from 500 g to 18 kg (median 2.8 kg). The model was internally validated using normalized prediction distribution errors. Results: Formation clearances of morphine to its glucuronides and elimination clearances of the glucuronides were found to be primarily influenced by bodyweight, which was parameterized using an allometric equation with an estimated exponential scaling factor of 1.44. Additionally, a postnatal age of less than 10 days was identified as a covariate for formation clearance to the glucuronides, independent of birthweight or postmenstrual age. Distribution volumes scaled linearly with bodyweight. Conclusions: Model-based simulations show that in newborns, including preterms, infants and children under the age of 3 years, a loading dose in μg/kg and a maintenance dose expressed in μg/kg1.5/h, with a 50% reduction of the maintenance dose in newborns younger than 10 days, results in a narrow range of morphine and metabolite serum concentrations throughout the studied age range. Future pharmacodynamic investigations are needed to reveal target concentrations in this population, after which final dosing recommendations can be made. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Routine morphine infusion in preterm newborns who received ventilatory support: a randomized controlled trial. (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/13260/</link>
      <pubDate>2003-11-12T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>CONTEXT: Newborns admitted to neonatal intensive care units (NICUs)
      undergo a variety of painful procedures and stressful events. Because the
      effect of continuous morphine infusion in preterm neonates has not been
      investigated systematically, there is confusion regarding whether morphine
      should be used routinely in this setting. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the
      effects of continuous intravenous morphine infusion on pain responses,
      incidence of intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), and poor neurologic
      outcome (severe IVH, periventricular leukomalacia, or death). DESIGN,
      SETTING, AND PATIENTS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled
      trial conducted between December 2000 and October 2002 in 2 level III
      NICUs in the Netherlands of 150 newborns who had received ventilatory
      support (inclusion criteria: postnatal age younger than 3 days and
      ventilation for less than 8 hours; exclusion criteria: severe asphyxia,
      severe IVH, major congenital malformations, and administration of
      neuromuscular blockers). INTERVENTIONS: Intravenous morphine (100
      microg/kg and 10 microg/kg per hour) or placebo infusion was given for 7
      days (or less because of clinical necessity in several cases). MAIN
      OUTCOME MEASURES: The analgesic effect of morphine, as assessed using
      validated scales; the effect of morphine on the incidence of IVH; and poor
      neurologic outcome. RESULTS: The analgesic effect did not differ between
      the morphine and placebo groups, judging from the following median
      (interquartile range) pain scores: Premature Infant Pain Profile, 10.1
      (8.2-11.6) vs 10.0 (8.2-12.0) (P =.94); Neonatal Infant Pain Scale, 4.8
      (3.7-6.0) vs 4.8 (3.2-6.0) (P =.58); and visual analog scale, 2.8
      (2.0-3.9) vs 2.6 (1.8-4.3) (P =.14), respectively. Routine morphine
      infusion decreased the incidence of IVH (23% vs 40%, P =.04) but did not
      influence poor neurologic outcome (10% vs 16%, P =.66). In addition,
      analyses were adjusted for the use of additional open-label morphine (27%
      of morphine group vs 40% of placebo group, P =.10). CONCLUSIONS: Lack of a
      measurable analgesic effect and absence of a beneficial effect on poor
      neurologic outcome do not support the routine use of morphine infusions as
      a standard of care in preterm newborns who have received ventilatory
      support. Follow-up is needed to evaluate the long-term effects of morphine
      infusions on the neurobehavioral outcomes of prematurity.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Do we still hurt newborn babies? A prospective study of procedural pain and analgesia in neonates. (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/13258/</link>
      <pubDate>2003-11-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: Despite an increasing awareness regarding pain management in
      neonates and the availability of published guidelines for the treatment of
      procedural pain, preterm neonates experience pain leading to short- and
      long-term detrimental effects. OBJECTIVE: To assess the frequency of use
      of analgesics in invasive procedures in neonates and the associated pain
      burden in this population. METHODS: For 151 neonates, we prospectively
      recorded all painful procedures, including the number of attempts
      required, and analgesic therapy used during the first 14 days of neonatal
      intensive care unit admission. These data were linked to estimates of the
      pain of each procedure, obtained from the opinions of experienced
      clinicians. RESULTS: On average, each neonate was subjected to a mean +/-
      SD of 14 +/- 4 procedures per day. The highest exposure to painful
      procedures occurred during the first day of admission, and most procedures
      (63.6%) consisted of suctioning. Many procedures (26 of 31 listed on a
      questionnaire) were estimated to be painful (pain scores &gt;4 on a 10-point
      scale). Preemptive analgesic therapy was provided to fewer than 35% of
      neonates per study day, while 39.7% of the neonates did not receive any
      analgesic therapy in the neonatal intensive care unit. CONCLUSIONS:
      Clinicians estimated that most neonatal intensive care unit procedures are
      painful, but only a third of the neonates received appropriate analgesic
      therapy. Despite the accumulating evidence that neonatal procedural pain
      is harmful, analgesic treatment for painful procedures is limited.
      Systematic approaches are required to reduce the occurrence of pain and to
      improve the analgesic treatment of repetitive pain in neonates.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Pain Assessment and Analgesia in the Newborn: An Integrated Approach (Doctoral Thesis)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/20957/</link>
      <pubDate>2000-06-14T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description></description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>