<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Ottink, M.D.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/15250/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Pulmonary disease assessment in cystic fibrosis: comparison of CT scoring systems and value of bronchial and arterial dimension measurements. (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/13347/</link>
      <pubDate>2004-05-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>PURPOSE: To retrospectively compare thin-section computed tomographic (CT)
      scores obtained with five scoring systems for assessment of pulmonary
      disease in children with cystic fibrosis and to determine additional value
      of bronchial and arterial dimension measurements. MATERIALS AND METHODS:
      Scores obtained with five thin-section CT scoring systems were compared. A
      score of 0 indicated the absence of abnormalities; a higher score meant
      that more structural abnormalities were seen. Three observers assigned
      scores and then reassigned scores after intervals varying from 1-2 weeks
      to 1-2 months at review of thin-section CT scans obtained in 25 children
      with cystic fibrosis. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability was
      calculated with intraclass correlation coefficients. Quantitative
      measurements of bronchial and arterial dimensions were obtained.
      Thin-section CT scores were correlated (Spearman correlation) with
      bronchial and arterial dimensions and with results of pulmonary function
      tests (PFTs), such as forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)).
      RESULTS: Scores with all five scoring systems were reproducible, with
      intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.74 and higher (P &lt;.05), and
      showed significant correlations with FEV(1) (R = -0.73 to -0.69, P &lt;.01).
      Ratio of bronchial diameter to accompanying pulmonary arterial diameter
      was correlated with thin-section CT scores but not with FEV(1). Ratio of
      bronchial wall thickness to accompanying pulmonary arterial diameter was
      not correlated with thin-section CT scores or PFT results. CONCLUSION:
      Thin-section CT scores were reproducible and were correlated with PFT
      results. Measurements of bronchial dimensions were not significantly
      related to scores or PFT results.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>