<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Virmani, R.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/1621/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Oxidative stress and pathological changes after coronary artery interventions (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/39810/</link>
      <pubDate>2013-04-09T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Oxidative stress greatly influences the pathogenesis of various cardiovascular disorders. Coronary interventions, including balloon angioplasty and coronary stent implantation, are associated with increased vascular levels of reactive oxygen species in conjunction with altered endothelial cell and smooth muscle cell function. These alterations potentially lead to restenosis, thrombosis, or endothelial dysfunction in the treated artery. Therefore, the understanding of the pathophysiological role of reactive oxygen species (ROS) generated during or after coronary interventions, or both, is essential to improve the success rate of these procedures. Superoxide O2·-anions, whether derived from uncoupled endothelial nitric oxide synthase, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase, xanthine oxidase, or mitochondria, are among the most harmful ROS. O2·-can scavenge nitric oxide, modify proteins and nucleotides, and induce proinflammatory signaling, which may lead to greater ROS production. Current innovations in stent technologies, including biodegradable stents, nitric oxide donor-coated stents, and a new generation of drug-eluting stents, therefore address persistent oxidative stress and reduced nitric oxide bioavailability after percutaneous coronary interventions. This review discusses the molecular mechanisms of ROS generation after coronary interventions, the related pathological events - including restenosis, endothelial dysfunction, and stent thrombosis - and possible therapeutic ways forward. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Initial stress in biomechanical models of atherosclerotic plaques (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/31104/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-09-02T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Rupture of atherosclerotic plaques is the underlying cause for the majority of acute strokes and myocardial infarctions. Rupture of the plaque occurs when the stress in the plaque exceeds the strength of the material locally. Biomechanical stress analyses are commonly based on pressurized geometries, in most cases measured by in-vivo MRI. The geometry is therefore not stress-free. The aim of this study is to identify the effect of neglecting the initial stress state on the plaque stress distribution. Fifty 2D histological sections (7 patients, 9 diseased coronary artery segments), perfusion fixed at 100. mmHg, were segmented and finite element models were created. The Backward Incremental method was applied to determine the initial stress state and the zero-pressure state. Peak plaque and cap stresses were compared with and without initial stress. The effect of initial stress on the peak stress was related to the minimum cap thickness, maximum necrotic core thickness, and necrotic core angle. When accounting for initial stress, the general relations between geometrical features and peak cap stress remain intact. However, on a patient-specific basis, accounting for initial stress has a different effect on the absolute cap stress for each plaque. Incorporating initial stress may therefore improve the accuracy of future stress based rupture risk analyses for atherosclerotic plaques. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Evaluation with in vivo optical coherence tomography and histology of the vascular effects of the everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold at two years following implantation in a healthy porcine coronary artery model: implications of pilot results for future pre-clinical studies (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/26457/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-04-20T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>To quantify with in vivo OCT and histology, the device/vessel interaction after implantation of the bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS). We evaluated the area and thickness of the strut voids previously occupied by the polymeric struts, and the neointimal hyperplasia (NIH) area covering the endoluminal surface of the strut voids (NIHEV), as well as the NIH area occupying the space between the strut voids (NIHBV), in healthy porcine coronary arteries at 2, 3 and 4 years after implantation of the device. Twenty-two polymeric BVS were implanted in the coronary arteries of 11 healthy Yucatan minipigs that underwent OCT at 2, 3 and 4 years after implantation, immediately followed by euthanasia. The areas and thicknesses of 60 corresponding strut voids previously occupied by the polymeric struts and the size of 60 corresponding NIHEVand 49 NIHBVwere evaluated with both OCT and histology by 2 independent observers, using a single quantitative analysis software for both techniques. At 3 and 4 years after implantation, the strut voids were no longer detectable by OCT or histology due to complete polymer resorption. However, analysis performed at 2 years still provided clear delineation of these structures, by both techniques. The median [ranges] areas of these strut voids were 0.04 [0.03-0.16] and 0.02 [0.01-0.07] mm2by histology and OCT, respectively. The mean (±SD) thickness by histology and OCT was 220 ± 40 and 120 ± 20 μm, respectively. The median [ranges] NIHEVby histology and OCT was 0.07 [0.04-0.20] and 0.03 [0.01-0.08] mm2, while the mean (±SD) NIHBVby histology and OCT was 0.13 ± 0.07 and 0.10 ± 0.06 mm2. Our study indicates that in vivo OCT of the BVS provides correlated measurements of the same order of magnitude as histomorphometry, and is reproducible for the evaluation of certain vascular and device-related characteristics. However, histology systematically gives larger values for all the measured structures compared to OCT, at 2 years post implantation. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Effects of intima stiffness and plaque morphology on peak cap stress (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/25503/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-04-11T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Background: Rupture of the cap of a vulnerable plaque present in a coronary vessel may cause myocardial infarction and death. Cap rupture occurs when the peak cap stress exceeds the cap strength. The mechanical stress within a cap depends on the plaque morphology and the material characteristics of the plaque components. A parametric study was conducted to assess the effect of intima stiffness and plaque morphology on peak cap stress.Methods: Models with idealized geometries based on histology images of human coronary arteries were generated by varying geometric plaque features. The constructed multi-layer models contained adventitia, media, intima, and necrotic core sections. For adventitia and media layers, anisotropic hyperelastic material models were used. For necrotic core and intima sections, isotropic hyperelastic material models were employed. Three different intima stiffness values were used to cover the wide range reported in literature. According to the intima stiffness, the models were classified as stiff, intermediate and soft intima models. Finite element method was used to compute peak cap stress.Results: The intima stiffness was an essential determinant of cap stresses. The computed peak cap stresses for the soft intima models were much lower than for stiff and intermediate intima models. Intima stiffness also affected the influence of morphological parameters on cap stresses. For the stiff and intermediate intima models, the cap thickness and necrotic core thickness were the most important determinants of cap stresses. The peak cap stress increased three-fold when the cap thickness was reduced from 0.25 mm to 0.05 mm for both stiff and intermediate intima models. Doubling the thickness of the necrotic core elevated the peak cap stress by 60% for the stiff intima models and by 90% for the intermediate intima models. Two-fold increase in the intima thickness behind the necrotic core reduced the peak cap stress by approximately 25% for both intima models. For the soft intima models, cap thickness was less critical and changed the peak cap stress by 55%. However, the necrotic core thickness was more influential and changed the peak cap stress by 100%. The necrotic core angle emerged as a critical determinant of cap stresses where a larger angle lowered the cap stresses. Contrary to the stiff and intermediate intima models, a thicker intima behind the necrotic core increased the peak cap stress by approximately 25% for the soft intima models. Adventitia thickness and local media regression had limited effects for all three intima models.Conclusions: For the stiff and intermediate intima models, the cap thickness was the most important morphological risk factor. However for soft intima models, the necrotic core thickness and necrotic core angle had a bigger impact on the peak cap stress. We therefore need to enhance our knowledge of intima material properties if we want to derive critical morphological plaque features for risk evaluation. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Intracoronary optical coherence tomography and histology at 1 month and 2, 3, and 4 years after implantation of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in a porcine coronary artery model: An attempt to decipher the human optical coherence tomography images in the ABSORB trial (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/27443/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-11-30T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Background-: With the use of optical coherence tomography (OCT), alterations of the reflectance characteristics of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) struts have been reported in humans. In the absence of histology, the interpretation of the appearances of the struts by OCT remains speculative. We therefore report OCT findings with corresponding histology in the porcine coronary artery model immediately after and at 28 days and 2, 3, and 4 years after BVS implantation. Methods and results-: Thirty-five polymeric BVS (3.0×12.0 mm) were singly implanted in the main coronary arteries of 17 pigs that underwent OCT and were then euthanized immediately (n=2), at 28 days (n=2), at 2 years (n=3), at 3 years (n=5), or at 4 years (n=5) after implantation. All BVS-implanted arteries in these animals were evaluated by histology except for 5 arteries examined at 2 years with gel permeation chromatography to assess the biodegradation of the polymeric device. Fourteen arteries with BVS from an additional 6 pigs were examined by gel permeation chromatography at 1 (n=1), 1.5 (n=2), and 3 (n=2) years. Corresponding OCT and histology images were selected with the distal and proximal radiopaque markers used as landmarks. At 28 days, by OCT, 82% of struts showed sharply defined, bright reflection borders, best described as a box-shaped appearance. Histologically, all struts appeared intact with no evidence of resorption. At 2 years, by OCT, 60±20 struts were discernible per BVS with 80.4% of the strut sites as a box-shaped appearance. Despite their defined appearance by OCT, by histology, these structures appeared to be composed of proteoglycan, with polymeric material being at such low level as to be no longer quantifiable by chromatography. At 3 years, by OCT, recognizable struts decreased to 28±9 struts per BVS: 43.7% showed dissolved black box; 34.8%, dissolved bright box; 16.1%, open box; and 5.4%, preserved box appearance. Histology shows that connective tissue cells within a proteoglycan-rich matrix replaced the areas previously occupied by the polymeric struts and coalesced into the arterial wall. At 4 years, by OCT, 10±6 struts were recognizable as either dissolved black or dissolved bright box. In histology, these struts are minimally discernible as foci of low-cellular-density connective tissue. Relative to the prediction of histological type by OCT appearance, the preserved box appearance of OCT corresponds well with 2-year histology (86.4%), whereas the dissolved bright and black box appearances correspond to 3-year histology (88.0% and 90.7%, respectively). Struts indiscernible by OCT correspond to the integrated strut footprints seen at 4 years (100%). Conclusions-: Struts that are still discernible by OCT at 2 years are compatible with largely bioresorbed struts, as demonstrated by histological and gel permeation chromatography analysis. At 3 and 4 years, both OCT and histology confirm complete integration of the struts into the arterial wall. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Actinomycin-eluting stent for coronary revascularization: a randomized feasibility and safety study: the ACTION trial. (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/4636/</link>
      <pubDate>2004-10-06T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>OBJECTIVES: We sought to demonstrate the safety and performance of the actinomycin D-coated Multilink-Tetra stent(Guidant Corp., Santa Clara, California) in the treatment of patients with single de novo native coronary lesions. BACKGROUND: Drug-eluting stents (DES) releasing sirolimus or paclitaxel dramatically reduce restenosis. The anti-proliferative drug, actinomycin D, which is highly effective in reducing neointimal proliferation in preclinical studies, was selected for clinical evaluation. METHODS: The multi-center, single-blind, three-arm ACTinomycin-eluting stent Improves Outcomes by reducing Neointimal hyperplasia (ACTION) trial randomized 360 patients to receive a DES (2.5 or 10 microg/cm(2) of actinomycin D) or metallic stent (MS). The primary end points were major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 30 days, diameter stenosis by angiography, tissue effects, and neointimal volume by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) at six months. When early monitoring revealed an increased rate of repeat revascularization, the protocol was amended to allow for additional follow-up for DES patients. Angiographic control of MS patients was no longer mandatory. RESULTS: The biased selection of DES patients undergoing IVUS follow-up invalidated the interpretation of the IVUS findings. The in-stent late lumen loss and that at the proximal and distal edges were higher in both DES groups than in the MS group and resulted in higher six-month and one-year MACE (34.8% and 43.1% vs. 13.5%), driven exclusively by target vessel revascularization without excess death or myocardial infarction. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the ACTION trial indicate that all anti-proliferative drugs will not uniformly show a drug class effect in the prevention of restenosis.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Terminology for high-risk and vulnerable coronary artery plaques (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/13420/</link>
      <pubDate>2004-06-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>A group of investigators met for two days in Santorini, Greece, to discuss progress in the field of identification and treatment of high risk/vulnerable atherosclerotic plaques and patients. Many differences in the manner in which terms are being utilized were noted. It was recognized that increased understanding of the pathophysiology of coronary thrombosis and onset of acute coronary syndromes has created the need for agreement on nomenclature. The participants spent considerable time discussing the topic and reached agreement on their own usage of the terms as described below. It is the hope that this usage might be of value to the larger community of scientists working in this field, and that widespread adoption of a common nomenclature would accelerate progress in the prevention of acute coronary events.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient: a call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies: Part II. (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/13247/</link>
      <pubDate>2003-10-14T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease results in &gt;19 million deaths annually, and coronary heart disease accounts for the majority of this toll. Despite major advances in treatment of coronary heart disease patients, a large number of victims of the disease who are apparently healthy die suddenly without prior symptoms. Available screening and diagnostic methods are insufficient to identify the victims before the event occurs. The recognition of the role of the vulnerable plaque has opened new avenues of opportunity in the field of cardiovascular medicine. This consensus document concludes the following. (1) Rupture-prone plaques are not the only vulnerable plaques. All types of atherosclerotic plaques with high likelihood of thrombotic complications and rapid progression should be considered as vulnerable plaques. We propose a classification for clinical as well as pathological evaluation of vulnerable plaques. (2) Vulnerable plaques are not the only culprit factors for the development of acute coronary syndromes, myocardial infarction, and sudden cardiac death. Vulnerable blood (prone to thrombosis) and vulnerable myocardium (prone to fatal arrhythmia) play an important role in the outcome. Therefore, the term "vulnerable patient" may be more appropriate and is proposed now for the identification of subjects with high likelihood of developing cardiac events in the near future. (3) A quantitative method for cumulative risk assessment of vulnerable patients needs to be developed that may include variables based on plaque, blood, and myocardial vulnerability. In Part I of this consensus document, we cover the new definition of vulnerable plaque and its relationship with vulnerable patients. Part II of this consensus document will focus on vulnerable blood and vulnerable myocardium and provide an outline of overall risk assessment of vulnerable patients. Parts I and II are meant to provide a general consensus and overviews the new field of vulnerable patient. Recently developed assays (eg, C-reactive protein), imaging techniques (eg, CT and MRI), noninvasive electrophysiological tests (for vulnerable myocardium), and emerging catheters (to localize and characterize vulnerable plaque) in combination with future genomic and proteomic techniques will guide us in the search for vulnerable patients. It will also lead to the development and deployment of new therapies and ultimately to reduce the incidence of acute coronary syndromes and sudden cardiac death. We encourage healthcare policy makers to promote translational research for screening and treatment of vulnerable patients.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient: a call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies: Part I. (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/13244/</link>
      <pubDate>2003-10-07T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease results in &gt;19 million deaths annually, and coronary heart disease accounts for the majority of this toll. Despite major advances in treatment of coronary heart disease patients, a large number of victims of the disease who are apparently healthy die suddenly without prior symptoms. Available screening and diagnostic methods are insufficient to identify the victims before the event occurs. The recognition of the role of the vulnerable plaque has opened new avenues of opportunity in the field of cardiovascular medicine. This consensus document concludes the following. (1) Rupture-prone plaques are not the only vulnerable plaques. All types of atherosclerotic plaques with high likelihood of thrombotic complications and rapid progression should be considered as vulnerable plaques. We propose a classification for clinical as well as pathological evaluation of vulnerable plaques. (2) Vulnerable plaques are not the only culprit factors for the development of acute coronary syndromes, myocardial infarction, and sudden cardiac death. Vulnerable blood (prone to thrombosis) and vulnerable myocardium (prone to fatal arrhythmia) play an important role in the outcome. Therefore, the term "vulnerable patient" may be more appropriate and is proposed now for the identification of subjects with high likelihood of developing cardiac events in the near future. (3) A quantitative method for cumulative risk assessment of vulnerable patients needs to be developed that may include variables based on plaque, blood, and myocardial vulnerability. In Part I of this consensus document, we cover the new definition of vulnerable plaque and its relationship with vulnerable patients. Part II of this consensus document focuses on vulnerable blood and vulnerable myocardium and provide an outline of overall risk assessment of vulnerable patients. Parts I and II are meant to provide a general consensus and overviews the new field of vulnerable patient. Recently developed assays (eg, C-reactive protein), imaging techniques (eg, CT and MRI), noninvasive electrophysiological tests (for vulnerable myocardium), and emerging catheters (to localize and characterize vulnerable plaque) in combination with future genomic and proteomic techniques will guide us in the search for vulnerable patients. It will also lead to the development and deployment of new therapies and ultimately to reduce the incidence of acute coronary syndromes and sudden cardiac death. We encourage healthcare policy makers to promote translational research for screening and treatment of vulnerable patients.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>