<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Kiewiet-Kemper, R.M.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/16361/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Morbidly obese human subjects have increased peripheral blood CD4 + T cells with skewing toward a Treg- and Th2-dominated phenotype (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/38280/</link>
      <pubDate>2012-02-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Obesity is associated with local T-cell abnormalities in adipose tissue. Systemic obesity-related abnormalities in the peripheral blood T-cell compartment are not well defined. In this study, we investigated the peripheral blood T-cell compartment of morbidly obese and lean subjects. We determined all major T-cell sub-populations via six-color flow cytometry, including CD8+and CD4+T cells, CD4+T-helper (Th) subpopulations, and natural CD4+CD25+FoxP3+T-regulatory (Treg) cells. Moreover, molecular analyses to assess thymic output, T-cell proliferation (T-cell receptor excision circle analysis), and T-cell receptor-β (TCRB) repertoire (GeneScan analysis) were performed. In addition, we determined plasma levels of proinflammatory cytokines and cytokines associated with Th subpopulations and T-cell proliferation. Morbidly obese subjects had a selective increase in peripheral blood CD4+naive, memory, natural CD4+CD25+FoxP3+Treg, and Th2 T cells, whereas CD8+T cells were normal. CD4+and CD8+T-cell proliferation was increased, whereas the TCRB repertoire was not significantly altered. Plasma levels of cytokines CCL5 and IL-7 were elevated. CD4+T-cell numbers correlated positively with fasting insulin levels. The peripheral blood T-cell compartment of morbidly obese subjects is characterized by increased homeostatic T-cell proliferation to which cytokines IL-7 and CCL5, among others, might contribute. This is associated with increased CD4+T cells, with skewing toward a Treg- and Th2-dominated phenotype, suggesting a more anti-inflammatory set point. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Acute effects of acylated and unacylated ghrelin on total and high molecular weight adiponectin in morbidly obese subjects (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/31304/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-06-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Background: Energy homeostasis and body weight are regulated by a highly complex network involving the brain, the digestive tract, and white adipose tissue (WAT). Knowledge about signaling pathways connecting digestive tract and WAT is limited. Gut hormone ghrelin and adipokine adiponectin are both decreased in obesity and they share a potent effect on insulin sensitivity: both adiponectin and the combination of acylated (AG) and unacylated ghrelin (UAG) improve insulin sensitivity. Arm: In the present study, we evaluated whether acute administration of UAG alone or combined with AG affects adiponectin concentrations. Subjects and methods: Eight morbidly obese non-diabetic subjects were treated with either UAG 200 μg, UAG 100 μg + AG 100 μg (Comb), or placebo in 3 episodes in a double blind randomized cross-over design. Study medication was administered as single iv bolus injections at 09:00 h after an overnight fast. High molecular weight (HMW) and total adiponectin, glucose, insulin, and total ghrelin and AG were measured up to 1 h after administration. Results: HMW and total adiponectin concentrations did not change after administration of either UAG or Comb, nor were they different from placebo. Insulin concentrations decreased significantly after acute administration of Comb, reaching a minimum at 20 min: 58.2±3.9% of baseline. Conclusions: Acute iv administration of UAG and the combination of UAG and AG in morbidly obese non-diabetic subjects without overt diabetes does not affect total or HMW adiponectin concentrations, neither directly nor indirectly by changing insulin concentrations. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Medical and surgical use of the gut in the treatment of Obesity (Doctoral Thesis)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/22185/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-01-05T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Obesity has become a worldwide epidemic that threatens to overwhelm both
developed and developing countries. The major burden of obesity to both
patients and public health as a whole is the significantly increased
morbidity and mortality. It is generally acknowledged that a decrease in
physical activity in combination with relative overeating leads to a
chronic positive energy balance, thereby causing an increase in body
weight. However, other factors that regulate individual susceptibility to
obesity in an â€˜obesogenic societyâ€™ must be involved as well but only a
small part has been identified. For example, genetics have been shown to 
play an important role. Genetic mutations and single nucleotide
polymorphisms have been identified that disrupt a highly complex endocrine
and neuroendocrine network that regulates energy homeostasis and body
weight. The main sites of (inter-)action in this network are white adipose
tissue (WAT), the digestive tract and the hypothalamus.
The physiology of the gut hormone ghrelin, the peptide obestatin, and the
adipokine adiponectin are discussed. Ghrelin is a hormone principally
produced in the stomach and primarily identified as a strong growth
hormone secretagogue (GHS). Ghrelin circulates in two main isoforms:
acylated (AG) and unacylated (UAG) ghrelin. Acylation is crucial for its
binding to the known growth hormone receptor type 1a (GHS-R1a). Apart from
being a GHS, ghrelin has an important role in energy homeostasis, and in
glucose and insulin metabolism. Ghrelin is derived from the polypeptide
preproghrelin. The function of a second peptide derived from this
prohormone, obestatin, is currently hotly debated. Initially, obestatin
was described as a functional antagonist of ghrelin, but subsequent
studies were not able to replicate these results. Like ghrelin,
adiponectin plays an important role in glucose and insulin homeostasis.
Therefore, its connection with ghrelin must be identified.
Unfortunately, treatment of obesity is difficult. Currently, bariatric
surgery is the most effective treatment when quantified in terms of weight
loss. However, it is at least equally important to assess its
effectiveness in improving comorbidity. Additionally, any side effects of
surgery should be acceptable. The effect of bariatric surgery on quality
of life (QoL), and the risk of patients developing gallstones after
bariatric surgery are discussed.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Effects of acute administration of acylated and unacylated ghrelin on glucose and insulin concentrations in morbidly obese subjects without overt diabetes (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/17896/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-11-27T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Objective: To investigate the effects of unacylated ghrelin (UAG) and co-administration of acylated ghrelin (AG) and UAG in morbid obesity, a condition characterized by insulin resistance and low GH levels. Design and method: Eight morbidly obese non-diabetic subjects were treated with either UAG 200 μg, UAG 100 μg in combination with AG 100 μg (Comb) or placebo in three episodes of 4 consecutive days in a double-blind randomized crossover design. Study medication was administered as daily single i.v. bolus injections at 0900 h after an overnight fast. At 1000 h, a standardized meal was served. Glucose, insulin, GH, free fatty acids (FFA) and ghrelin were measured up to 4 h after administration. Results: Insulin concentrations significantly decreased after acute administration of Comb only, reaching a minimum at 20 min: 58.2 ± 3.9% of baseline versus 88.7 ± 7.2 and 92.7± 2.6% after administration of placebo and UAG respectively (P&lt;0.01). After 1 h, insulin concentration had returned to baseline. Glucose concentrations did not change after Comb. However, UAG administration alone did not change glucose, insulin, FFA or GH levels. Conclusion: Co-administration of AG and UAG as a single i.v. bolus injection causes a significant decrease in insulin concentration in non-diabetic subjects suffering from morbid obesity. Since glucose concentration did not change in the first hour after Comb administration, our data suggest a strong improvement in insulin sensitivity. These findings warrant studies in which UAG with or without AG is administered for a longer period of time. Administration of a single bolus injection of UAG did not influence glucose and insulin metabolism.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Bolus administration of obestatin does not change glucose and insulin levels neither in the systemic nor in the portal circulation of the rat (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/14258/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-12-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Obestatin is a second peptide derived from the preproghrelin polypeptide. It was originally thought to have anorexigenic effects, thereby functioning as an antagonist of ghrelin. However, this has been a subject of debate ever since. Since acylated ghrelin strongly induces insulin resistance, it could be hypothesized that obestatin plays a role in glucose homeostasis as well. In the present study we evaluated the effect of obestatin on glucose and insulin metabolism in the systemic and portal circulation. Obestatin 200 nmol/kg was administered systemically as a single intravenous bolus injection to fasted pentobarbital anesthetized adult male Wistar rats. Up to 50 min after administration, blood samples were taken to measure glucose and insulin concentrations, both in the portal and in the systemic circulation. The effect of obestatin was evaluated in fasted and in glucose-stimulated conditions (IVGTT) and compared to control groups treated with saline or IVGTT, respectively. Intravenous administration of obestatin did not have any effect on glucose and insulin concentrations, neither systemic nor portal, when compared to the control groups. Only the glucose peak 1 min after administration of IVGTT was slightly higher in the obestatin treated rats: 605.8 ± 106.3% vs. 522.2 ± 47.1% in the portal circulation, respectively (NS), and 800.7 ± 78.7% vs. 549.6 ± 37.0% in the systemic circulation, respectively (P &lt; 0.02), but it can be debated whether this has any clinical relevance. In the present study, we demonstrated that intravenously administered obestatin does not influence glucose and insulin concentrations, neither in the portal nor in the systemic circulation.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Intravenous glucose administration in fasting rats has differential effects on acylated and unacylated ghrelin in the portal and systemic circulation: A comparison between portal and peripheral concentrations in anesthetized rats (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/35143/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-11-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Ghrelin is produced by the gastrointestinal tract, and its systemic concentrations are mainly regulated by nutritional factors. Our aim was to investigate: 1) endogenous portal and systemic acylated and unacylated ghrelin levels (AG and UAG, respectively); 2) whether an iv glucose tolerance test (IVGTT) modifies AG and UAG; and 3) whether the liver passage plays a role in regulating systemic AG and UAG. To elucidate this, we evaluated the effects of IVGTT or saline injection on endogenous portal and systemic concentrations of glucose, insulin, AG, and UAG in anesthetized fasting rats. Hepatic extraction of insulin, AG, and UAG and the ratio of AG to UAG were also measured. IVGTT suppressed both portal (P &lt; 0.03) and peripheral (P &lt; 0.05) UAG, whereas it only blunted prehepatic, but not peripheral, AG. During fasting, hepatic clearance of UAG was 11%, and it was decreased to 8% by IVGTT. AG was cleared by the liver by 38% but unaffected by glucose. The AG to UAG ratio was higher in the portal than the systemic circulation, both in the saline (P &lt; 0.004) and IVGTT (P &lt; 0.0005) rats. In conclusion, this study shows that: 1) the ratio of AG to UAG is very low in the portal vein and decreases further in the systemic circulation; 2) IVGTT in anesthetized fasting rats inhibits UAG, whereas it only blunts prehepatic, but not systemic, AG; and 3) hepatic clearance of AG is much higher than that of UAG. Thus, our results suggest that peripheral AG metabolic regulation and action are mainly confined within the gastrointestinal tract. Copyright </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Unacylated ghrelin acts as a potent insulin secretagogue in glucose-stimulated conditions (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/35740/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-09-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Acylated and unacylated ghrelin (AG and UAG) are gut hormones that exert pleiotropic actions, including regulation of insulin secretion and glucose metabolism. In this study, we investigated whether AG and UAG differentially regulate portal and systemic insulin levels after a glucose load. We studied the effects of the administration of AG (30 nmol/kg), UAG (3 and 30 nmol/kg), the ghrelin receptor antagonist [D-Lys3]GHRP-6 (1 μmol/kg), or various combinations of these compounds on portal and systemic levels of glucose and insulin after an intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT, D-glucose 1 g/kg) in anesthetized fasted Wistar rats. UAG administration potently and dose-dependently enhanced the rise of insulin concentration induced by IVGTT in the portal and, to a lesser extent, the systemic circulation. This UAG-induced effect was completely blocked by the coadministration of exogenous AG at equimolar concentrations. Similarly to UAG, [D-Lys3]GHRP-6, alone or in combination with AG and UAG, strongly enhanced the portal insulin response to IVGTT, whereas exogenous AG alone did not exert any further effect. Our data demonstrate that, in glucose-stimulated conditions, exogenous UAG acts as a potent insulin secretagogue, whereas endogenous AG exerts a maximal tonic inhibition on glucose-induced insulin release. Copyright </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>