<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Ruige, J.B.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/1723/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Performance of a predictive model to identify undiagnosed diabetes in a health care setting (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9105/</link>
      <pubDate>1999-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>OBJECTIVE: To develop a predictive model to identify individuals with an
          increased risk for undiagnosed diabetes, allowing for the availability of
          information within the health care system. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A
          sample of participants from the Rotterdam Study (n = 1,016), aged 55-75
          years, not known to have diabetes completed a questionnaire on
          diabetes-related symptoms and risk factors and underwent a glucose
          tolerance test. Predictive models were developed using stepwise logistic
          regression analyses with the absence or presence of newly diagnosed
          diabetes as the dependent variable and various items with a plausible
          connection to diabetes as the independent variables. The models were
          evaluated in another Dutch population-based study, the Hoorn Study (n =
          2,364), in which the participants were aged 50-74 years. Performances of
          the predictive models were compared by using receiver-operator
          characteristics (ROC) curves. RESULTS: We developed three predictive
          models (PMs), PM1 contained information routinely collected by the general
          practitioner, while PM2 also contained variables obtainable by additional
          questions. The third predictive model, PM3, included variables that had to
          be obtained from a physical examination. These latter variables did not
          have additive predictive value, resulting in a PM3 similar to PM2. The
          area under the ROC curve was higher for PM2 than for PM1, but the 95% Cls
          overlapped (0.74 [0.70-0.78] and 0.68 [0.64-0.72], respectively).
          CONCLUSIONS: Using only information normally present in the files of a
          general practitioner, a predictive model was developed that performed
          similarly to one supplemented by information obtained from additional
          questions. The simplicity of PM1 makes it easy to implement in the current
          health care setting.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>