<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Chen, Y-R.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/17609/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Development and implementation of guidelines in allergic rhinitis - an ARIA-GA2LEN paper (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/27799/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-10-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The links between asthma and rhinitis are well characterized. The Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) guidelines stress the importance of these links and provide guidance for their prevention and treatment. Despite effective treatments being available, too few patients receive appropriate medical care for both diseases. Most patients with rhinitis and asthma consult primary care physicians and therefore these physicians are encouraged to understand and use ARIA guidelines. Patients should also be informed about these guidelines to raise their awareness of optimal care and increase control of the two related diseases. To apply these guidelines, clinicians and patients need to understand how and why the recommendations were made. The goal of the ARIA guidelines is to provide recommendations about the best management options for most patients in most situations. These recommendations should be based on the best available evidence. Making recommendations requires the assessment of the quality of available evidence, deciding on the balance between benefits and downsides, consideration of patients' values and preferences, and, if applicable, resource implications. Guidelines must be updated as new management options become available or important new evidence emerges. Transparent reporting of guidelines facilitates understanding and acceptance, but implementation strategies need to be improved. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) 2008 update (in collaboration with the World Health Organization, GA2LEN and AllerGen) (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/29333/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-04-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description></description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>The influence of interdependent self-construal on procedural fairness effects (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/14997/</link>
      <pubDate>2005-03-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Various theories have been shown to account for the effects of procedural fairness on people’s attitudes and behaviors. We propose that a logical next step for organizational justice researchers is to delineate not whether, but rather when certain explanations are likely to account for people’s reactions to procedural fairness information. Accordingly, the present research tested the hypothesis that social psychological explanations would be particularly applicable to people high in interdependent self-construal. As predicted, the results of three studies showed that interdependent self-construal (ISC) moderated the relationship between procedural fairness and a variety of dependent variables (cooperation, positive affect, and desire for future interaction with the other party). In different types of interpersonal encounters (social dilemmas, reward allocations, and negotiations), procedural fairness had more of an influence on participants’ reactions among those high rather than low in ISC. Theoretical implications are discussed.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>